The government’s blueprint and investment decisions for the development of higher education are crucial to Taiwan’s future national competitiveness.
Due to the rapid expansion of higher education over the past two decades, the number of universities and students has surged.
However, the national government’s and local governments’ financial difficulties, and the focus on new education policies — including the extended 12-year national education program and efforts to create a smooth transition from kindergarten to elementary school — have crowded out resources to higher education.
As a result, many public and private universities are forced to operate on a tight budget.
The free market economy’s focus on competition has resulted in a battle for resources among universities, which has resulted in an even more unbalanced distribution of resources.
Due to budget shortages, the quality of higher education is now in gradual decline.
Although the Ministry of Education is looking for a solution, its new policies and methods are old wine in new bottles.
It has failed to reform budget allocation and achieve equal treatment, coexistence and shared prosperity.
The ministry recently unveiled a method for budget allocation and resource application, releasing detailed regulations for the budgeting of the higher education development project, which was launched in July.
It has also suggested that, as universities apply for funding under the project, their budget proposals should be based on the amount of competitive funding for continuing projects that they have received for this academic year — such as the Aim For The Top University Project (邁向頂尖大學計畫), the Plan to Encourage Teaching Excellence in Universities (獎勵大學教學卓越計畫), the Teaching Empowerment Project (教學增能計畫), the Featured University Project (特色大學計畫) and the Innovative Teaching Project (教學創新計畫) — increasing the budget by no more than 30 percent on top of previous funding.
This passive adjustment might be repeating the mistake of the teaching excellence plan, under which strong schools become stronger and weak schools weaker.
A closer look at the ministry’s approach shows where the problems lie. Take, for example, universities funded by the teaching excellence plan between 2005 and this year: Out of the nation’s 71 universities and colleges, 42 universities were funded more than three times.
Among the funded schools, 13 universities — 18 percent — were funded at least 11 times, with total funding reaching almost NT$10.3 billion (US$343.2 million), or 52 percent of the total budget.
One university alone received NT$1.2 billion, almost 6 percent of the project’s total budget. The resources were clearly only lavished on a few schools, strengthening already strong institutes.
Moreover, analysis of the budgeting for the first and second component of the project shows that all universities are allowed to compete for the NT$4.4 billion budgeted under the first component, which aims to promote the overall quality of universities and diversity in higher education.
As for the NT$6 billion budgeted under the second component to help universities pursue first-class international status and develop their research centers, as the application threshold is so high, only a number of top universities are qualified to apply.
Top universities funded under the project’s second component are allowed to simultaneously receive funding under the first component.
The project is thus very similar to the teaching excellence plan and is likely to continue the uneven distribution of educational resources.
Dana Tai is president of the University of Taipei.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS