Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) is many things. He is notorious for his sharp tongue and unfiltered opinions. He sometimes puts on comical costumes, makes puzzling gestures or participates at events that some might deem unbecoming of the capital’s mayor. However, he is not wrong on the issue of a government subsidy for elderly people.
Although the next nine-in-one elections are still a year away, debate about the subsidy has been renewed, with a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) mayoral hopeful vowing to reinstate the subsidy should he be elected.
On Saturday last week, former KMT legislator Ting Shou-chung (丁守中) announced he would join the KMT Taipei mayoral primary, even though he has failed four times before to win the party’s nomination.
During his seven terms as a lawmaker, Ting proposed many concrete and constructive policies, including efforts to increase the percentage of low-floor buses in Taipei and transform unused public school spaces into daycare centers or nurseries.
Ting, who has described the Taipei mayoral post as the “final destination of my political career,” could have successfully presented himself as a candidate different from traditional KMT politicians if not for his pledge to reinstate the city’s subsidy for older people — an annual cash giveaway partially axed by Ko in 2015 at the expense of his popularity rating.
Initially, city residents aged 65 or older received a subsidy of NT$1,500 to NT$10,000 (US$50 to US$333) each September, depending on their age, in celebration of the Double Ninth Festival. It cost the city about NT$700 million a year.
After running as a reformist and winning election in 2014, Ko introduced a wealth exclusion clause to the subsidy, making it available only to senior citizens from low and middle-income families.
Ko said that what elderly Taipei residents need is not a once-a-year cash subsidy, but a sustainable care system.
It is puzzling why Ting, who has vowed to improve the city’s global competitiveness and living standards, would want to reinstate a short-sighted policy when he is aware of Taipei’s aging population, which is projected to rise from 16 percent of city residents to 20 percent in 2021.
Taipei has the highest percentage of elderly residents, defined as people aged 65 or above, among the six special municipalities.
This upward trend is unstoppable and is happening nationwide. Advocating the expansion of the subsidy is tantamount to opposing the phasing out of the controversial 18 percent savings rate for civil servants hired before 1995.
Everyone would like better social welfare and benefits from the government, but they should never be introduced at the risk of bankrupting the government. One-off cash giveaways might increase a politician’s popularity among voters, but that positive sentiment would be short-lived and do little to improve the living standards of older residents.
As Ko said earlier this month, local governments that continue to dole out the so-called “Double Ninth payments” are doing so out of electoral calculations and they are nothing but an attempt to bribe voters.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS