Special envoy to APEC James Soong’s (宋楚瑜) “natural” interaction with the leaders of other nations in the Asia-Pacific at the two-day APEC leaders’ summit in Da Nang, Vietnam, was given blanket coverage by domestic media. On his return to Taiwan, Soong headed to the Presidential Office to report on his “considerable diplomatic achievements” at the summit.
What follows are some thoughts on Soong’s suitability as Taiwan’s envoy to APEC, as well as reflections on Taiwan’s wider diplomatic strategy.
First, was Soong the right person to reach a breakthrough within the international community?
APEC is one of the few international forums in which Taiwan is able to participate relatively freely. One of the aims for Taiwan when taking part, aside from using it as an opportunity to build upon natural friendships, is to achieve substantial interaction with other countries. In this respect, Soong spared no effort.
However, as Soong does not hold executive powers and has no ability to influence Presidential Office policy, even if he had wanted to reach a diplomatic breakthrough or perhaps participate in a regional economic cooperation group, this would have first required high-level approval from the government.
Second, is Soong a defender of Taiwan’s values? To answer this question, one must first ask: Are Soong’s personal endorsements and his political ideology, both past and present, in line with majority public opinion?
Does he represent President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) administration? Or is he just a more internationalist version of those politicians who believe that stability and economic growth should be prioritized at the expense of everything else?
If the 2015 meeting between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) already left the public fearful, then at a more important international forum such as APEC, it is all the more likely that a politician who possesses a conservative, party-state ideology would pass on the chance to make Taiwan’s voice heard on the international stage.
Third, in terms of lowering tensions across the Strait, what can Soong offer?
Former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) and Tsai have both regarded Soong as being open to cooperating with the pan-green camp, while at the same time being largely acceptable to Beijing.
However, Soong has achieved little in terms of changing Beijing’s indifference, or downright hostility, to the Democratic Progressive Party or Taiwanese public opinion.
This has been Beijing’s consistent stance toward Taiwan and is reflected in the measures it has adopted. Put another way, even if the Chinese Communist Party “designates” or favors a certain political party or individual as the sole “window to cross-strait relations,” it is by no means certain that the Taiwanese public will find this acceptable.
Finally, there is the question of what this means for electoral prospects.
The Tsai administration has shown ample goodwill to Soong by making government resources available.
However, Soong’s People First Party, both in and outside the legislature, sides more with the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) on many issues. This is perhaps based on his stance of essentially being in “perpetual opposition,” but it does arouse suspicion.
It at least appears that he is taking advantage of the stage the Tsai administration has given him to gain exposure, which will benefit his party come the next election, rather than being sincere in his cooperation with the government and trying to solve some of the country’s predicaments.
After the media attention subsides, there remains something about this year’s APEC meeting that the public will fail to find reassurance in.
It is unclear to many of us why we are forced to continuously go through these cycles of hand-wringing and groveling, hoping for some kind of acquiescence or tacit approval by Beijing, before we can achieve any form of vague, ambiguous room for maneuver in international forums.
Jethro Wang is an MA student at National Taiwan University’s Graduate Institute of National Development.
Translated by Edward Jones and Paul Cooper
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
RSS