Labor abuses still bedevil Taiwanese firms abroad.
Quanta Computer on Wednesday last week posted third-quarter sales of NT$276.17 billion (US$9.16 billion), an improvement of 17.33 percent over the previous quarter and almost 24 percent from the same quarter last year that one company official attributed to “better-than-expected notebook shipments and strong orders for servers.”
However, no mention was made of allegations about money the company is saving by having teenage vocational-school students work as “interns” on the company’s production lines in Chongqing, China.
Students and Scholars Against Corporate Misbehavior (SACOM), a 12-year-old Hong Kong non-profit group, on Sept. 22 reported on what it said were abuses of young students at the factory, where it said more than 60 percent of workers were interns, even though Chinese labor laws state that interns should not exceed 10 percent of a factory’s workforce.
SACOM said that undercover research and interviews at the factory from late last year through the middle of this year found about half of the workforce is made up of students on three-month internships, who were working 12-hour shifts for months at a time without days off for a little over US$250 per month.
Some of the students had been hired, illegally, through recruitment agencies, some had to pay deposits to their schools to receive an internship, while others were forced by their schools to work at the factory under the threat of not being able to graduate or having their room and board subsidies cut, it said.
The SACOM report and allegations were on Oct. 6 covered by the Guardian on its “Modern day slavery in focus” Web site.
The Guardian said that Quanta Computer had denied the report’s allegations, calling them “untrue and unfair to the company. There are serious mistakes in the information... from the undercover investigators.”
Quanta did not specify what those mistakes were, the newspaper said.
However, Quanta’s denials come up against a sorry history of labor abuses by Taiwanese-owned firms in China and elsewhere, be it a wave of worker suicides at Hon Hai Precision Industry Co’s (Foxconn) Long-hua factory in Shenzhen, China, in 2010; reports of violent discipline and summary dismissals by Ho Hing clothing workers in Cambodia in 2010; physical abuse reported by Indonesian workers at a Pou Chen Group factory in Sukabumi and a PT Amara Footwear factory outside Jakarta in 2011; or Vietnamese protesting against Hong Fu Vietnam Footwear Co in 2015.
It is also not the first time that a Taiwanese company has been accused of misusing student interns in China. Such allegations were first raised in 2012, when Foxconn was reportedly using students on forced internships to assemble iPhones.
Those reports were supposed to have led to Chinese labor laws being tightened to require internships to be directly related to students’ course of study. However, if SACOM’s allegations are true, these regulations continue to be widely flouted.
Many Taiwanese companies began relocating to China and Southeast Asia more than two decades ago, looking for cheaper land and lower labor costs. However, truth be told, many were also seeking to escape the increasingly strict environmental protection and labor regulations being passed in Taiwan.
In the intervening years, they have been faced with demands for higher wages, both by workers and by local governments, while the low-margin economies of scale of contract manufacturing are squeezing already small profits. It is a difficult cycle to break.
As the government pushes its New Southbound Policy to expand the nation’s export markets, diversify its products and encourage more Taiwanese companies to invest in the region, it is worth reminding corporate leaders — and government officials — that the practices of companies reflect not only on themselves, but also on this nation.
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
“Integrated Diplomacy” (總和外交) is the guiding principle of Taiwan’s current foreign policy. It seeks to mobilize technology, capital and talent for global outreach, strengthening Taiwan’s international connections. However, without a robust information security mechanism, such efforts risk being reduced to superficial courtesy calls. Security clearance serves as the “entrance examination results” for government agency personnel in sensitive positions, qualifying them to access sensitive information. Senior aides in the US Congress must also possess security clearance to assist lawmakers in handling classified budgets. However, security clearance is not an automatic right or a blanket necessity for accessing sensitive information. Access is granted only
Late on Tuesday evening, South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol declared martial law. A BBC analysis cited as reasons the opposition parties’ majority in the National Assembly, their continued boycott of the national budget and the impeachment of key officials and prosecutors, leading to frequent government gridlock. During the years that Taiwan and South Korea traveled the road to democratization, our countries hit many potholes. Taiwan cannot return to the Martial Law era. Despite the similarities in our authoritarian past, Yoon’s political travails are far removed from the issues Taiwan faces. Yoon’s actions are a wake-up call to the world about
RSS