While there has been a tide of civic efforts to curb food waste and utilize leftover ingredients, it is good to see more local government bodies getting on board with the concept. For example, after the Taipei Summer Universiade, the Taipei City Government shipped uneaten food to various social welfare organizations.
On Tuesday, the Central News Agency reported that the New Taipei City Government has been working with civic organizations and businesses to set up a network that would provide “ugly vegetables” and other leftover ingredients to kitchens that serve meals to the needy. Meanwhile, similar initiatives have been popping up nationwide, such as a restaurant in Taichung that uses leftover ingredients and a chef who visits people’s homes to cook meals from whatever is in their refrigerators.
Not wasting food is crucial to Taiwan’s bid to become a circular economy, as the statistics are jarring: Last year, a report showed that Taiwan’s convenience stores and supermarkets alone discarded more than 36,000 tonnes of food per year. According to National Taiwan University statistics, the total amount of food wasted annually in Taiwan is about 3.73 million tonnes, or 158kg per person.
What is alarming about these numbers is that more than 60 percent of the food is wasted by consumers — which is about 20 percent greater than in other nations in the Asia-Pacific region. While organizations and businesses can do their part in facilitating the recycling of food, it is ultimately up to people and individual restaurants and stores to change their mindset to make the most impact. How often do you buy more food than you can eat, perhaps because that item was on sale? How many times have you been lazy and directly tossed your kitchen waste into your regular garbage?
It is time to start paying attention — especially with these new initiatives that put a spotlight on how many people in Taiwan actually do not have enough food to eat. Food waste by consumers is the product of a developed and prosperous society, but often ignored is the fact that there are people who could use the food that is thrown out. Wasting food does not just affect people, it impacts resources such as land, energy and water, and in turn the economy.
With Taiwan’s rapid urbanization and economic boom, most adults today grew up with a disconnect as to where their food came from. This is gradually changing through school programs and other rural education classes, in which urban children spend time at farms or try to grow their own vegetables. This will definitely help them become more conscious about wasting food in the future.
The time of seemingly infinite resources has long passed, and it is not just the government and businesses that need to do their part to create a circular economy — it is up to every individual.
In other news on the recycling front, the Environmental Protection Administration on Monday announced its bid to make Taiwan “plastic free” in 10 years, with plans to ban products with plastic beads starting next year, when 80,000 stores are also to stop handing out plastic bags for free. However, with a maximum price of NT$1 per bag, it is still questionable what the impact of the policy will be. Maybe actor Kuo Tzu-chien (郭子乾) is right — to really stop the use of plastic bags, the government should allow stores to sell them for as much as NT$100.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS