The Chinese nickname for newly appointed Premier William Lai (賴清德) is Lai Shen (賴神) — “Lai the Divine” or “Divine Lai.”
Paying attention to what he does and says provides a good understanding of why that is.
He differs from other politicians, who beat around the bush and are afraid to speak their minds, and instead draws clear demarcations between himself and what he does not like. When he served as Tainan mayor, rather than creating the conventional illusion of harmony between the city government and the city council, he stood up to then-Tainan City council speaker Lee Chuan-chiao (李全教), who was facing bribery charges.
He is also outspoken about his political stance, rather than being two-faced and telling people only what they want to hear. At a forum at Fudan University in Shanghai, he spoke with fervor and assurance on sensitive issues such as Taiwanese independence and student movements, instead of being timid and holding back.
The nickname “Lai the Divine” is much more about a sense of intimacy that has grown around an appreciation of his sincerity, rather than about placing him on a political pedestal and worshiping him.
Today’s Taiwan is still trying to find a way to make an international breakthrough, while at the same time having to deal with thorny domestic social problems. As a result, Taiwanese tend to deify a few “political superstars,” such as Lai and Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), and rely on them as “saviors,” but such political idolatry is both bizarre and dangerous.
Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) was blindly worshiped — not as the “great man of the century,” a savior and a mighty helmsman, but as an evil demon, a murderer and an enemy of Taiwanese. The sins that “god” Chiang committed in Taiwan are too numerous, but they include the 228 Incident, which eradicated members of the local elite, the political persecution of the White Terror era and the suppression of political dissent, as well as political imprisonments and blacklists.
Anyone who blindly goes along with political worship is guilty of perpetuating it.
A look at Chiang in Taiwan and Adolf Hitler in Germany will show that deification is the result of political fraudsters and blindly uncritical followers that egg each other on. The crowds of blind worshipers are agitated by wildly ambitious political charlatans and their empty, hypnotic slogans, while the political charlatans become increasingly demonic, egged on by the cheering and encouragement of the blind masses.
Once politicians are being worshiped, the political conditions that they need have been met and they charge toward the edge of a cliff like a runaway train as they push forward their stubborn, willful and mistaken policies, creating disaster and catastrophe along the way.
A look at history and the people who were hijacked by Chiang and Hitler, as those politicians pursued their godlike status, shows that no one was a winner: The political charlatans turned their own lives into a tragedy and could not escape the harsh judgement of history, while the blind masses had their humanity distorted as they became complicit in the politicians’ crimes, whether intentionally or not.
Those who dared oppose the political “gods” were either made to disappear or imprisoned. Many innocent people had no choice but to resign themselves to do as they were told or suffer the consequences.
Idolization makes political charlatans go crazy, and it drives the blind masses crazy.
This is why it needs to be said that “Lai the Divine” is not some three-headed, six-armed divine figure — as clever and insightful as he is, there are some things that are beyond his ability; as thoughtful as he is, he will make mistakes; as broad as his vision is, there will be blind spots.
The need to monitor closely what he does and what he says should not be forgotten while his abilities are recognized and he is expected to do what he is good at and carry out reform.
When he strays, he must be told. When he makes mistakes, he must be told and corrected — this is good for him and good for us all. Placing him on a political pedestal will only harm him and Taiwan.
Chang Kuo-tsai is a retired associate professor at National Hsinchu University of Education and a former deputy secretary-general of the Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Lin Lee-Kai
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means
RSS