The alleged rape of a 10-year-old boy raises a lot of questions about how the nation handles sexual offenders — especially those who target children.
The issue of how to handle sex offenders has been brought up many times, but as these offenses continue it is obvious that what the government is doing is still insufficient.
The suspect, surnamed Chen, has a long history of similar offenses, and despite mandatory therapy sessions during and after his time in jail when he admitted that he cannot control himself when he sees children, he was still allowed to roam free.
Taipei Prison responded by saying that since Chen had served his jail sentence and was not on parole, they had no means of monitoring him once he left the prison grounds.
He was released on July 31, but was involved in a burglary case just three days later. That should have been a red flag.
On Saturday he attended a therapy session at the Yilan County Department of Health, which reportedly regarded him as “doing very well and very cooperative, with no signs of anything unusual.”
The next day, he allegedly committed the crime.
What went wrong? How do we prevent these types of cases from happening?
While there is no surefire way to stop pedophiles from committing crimes short of executing them, there is one thing that is clearly missing from the criminal justice system — a public register of sex offenders.
In the US, anyone can go on the Internet and look at which sex offenders live near you. In Taiwan, only certain industries are allowed to request access to this register for employment purposes.
Chen was staying with his family in Yilan when he allegedly committed the crime. According to his neighbors, he had already exhibited suspicious behavior such as staring at children playing and even using binoculars to look at them.
The victim’s mother said that her son told her Chen would hug him when he saw him.
They knew he had a criminal history, but there was no way to find out the magnitude of what he had done without a publicly accessible register. A simple online search would have exposed him as a repeatedly convicted pedophile and the crime could have been prevented.
According to a Brookings Institution report, Taiwan’s register of sex offenders was not made public because of “fierce opposition from human rights groups.”
Yes, there are repentant criminals who want to live normal lives after they are released from jail, but when it comes down to whether to protect potential victims or former criminals, the choice is pretty clear. Plus, it is not a lifetime register. Offenders are removed from the list after five or seven years, depending on the situation.
The prison system and health departments should be more stringent when dealing with these types of repeat offenders. This is someone who has a long history of child molestation, was in jail for raping a boy, during which time he also raped his cellmate. Yet, he was released a month early for “good behavior.”
Most people, no matter their inclination, can exhibit good behavior for a short period of time. Do these institutions just look at his performance at the time without considering his history or his possible behavior outside of therapy?
Chen’s “good behavior” could have been debunked if there was a public register of sexual offenders. Once informed, members of the public could have cooperated with the authorities and the health department, and they would have been more alert rather than praising his behavior.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS