The election of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Central Committee members concluded not long ago. According to the KMT, 39 younger party members were elected, compared with 26 in the previous election, accounting for about 19 percent of the 210 committee members.
Moreover, some middle-aged politicians were elected, including legislators Wayne Chiang (蔣萬安), 39, and Johnny Chiang (江啟臣), 45, as well as Sean Lien (連勝文), 47, and Kao Su-po (高思博), 49, who both intend to stand in local government elections next year.
A KMT spokesman might have exaggerated the outcome, saying it reflected how the party is “gradually getting younger,” but perhaps there is the possibility of a rising younger generation inside the party.
However, it remains to be seen whether such a force could reverse the traditional thinking of KMT Chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) and the old guard and become a dominant force, as they face several obstacles.
First, as President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) approval rating continued to plummet, she was forced to save herself by appointing former Tainan mayor William Lai (賴清德) as premier.
Tsai is clearly taking a gamble in which she and Lai will rise or fall together, in the hope that it will reverse the unfavorable situation facing her administration and improve the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) chances in next year’s elections.
Her administration’s difficulties present an opportunity to the KMT. The network of factions within the party, which had fallen apart, is now coming back to life as they try to get close to Wu, as if another power transfer was about to occur and they were about to re-enter the corridors of power.
As these traditional conservative forces take credit for Wu, it is unlikely that he would ignore them and instead support rising middle-aged or younger party members, allowing them to dominate the party’s reform process.
Next, a number of the KMT’s active younger and middle-aged politicians are “second-generation politicians” who have long benefited from the power and connections of their parents.
Not all of the party’s second-generation politicians rely on their parents, but they have been influenced by that generation’s traditional ideologies and might avoid hurting their parents’ connections, making it difficult for them to push for party reform.
If newcomers who lack money and connections really want to shine, they will have to rely on the second-generation politicians to take them along for the ride and offer them more exposure.
However, after finally getting the chance to be heard thanks to the second-generation politicians, they will owe them a debt of gratitude and will therefore be unlikely to push for drastic reform.
Finally, looking at Wu’s personnel philosophy and his own personality, he seldom takes public opinion into consideration when making decisions.
For example, when former KMT chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) unexpectedly stepped down, Wu fell short of public expectations, as he refused to take over the chairmanship a few weeks early. Besides, he is extremely confident in himself.
How could a self-proclaimed brilliant party chairman give priority to the opinions of young or middle-aged party members when pushing for reform?
Is the party’s policy of putting middle-aged people in important positions while cultivating younger members going to exist in name only? We will have to wait and see what happens.
The rising number of young Central Committee members is an opportunity for the aging KMT. By contrast, the DPP has already completed a generational transition and is dominated by middle-aged politicians, while almost 70 percent of the New Power Party’s (NPP) top officials are under the age of 40.
The KMT is far behind them: Young party members only account for one-fifth of the total number of Central Committee seats.
Today, both the DPP and the NPP are actively attracting young voters by nominating younger candidates in elections.
If the KMT continues to be dominated by the old-fashioned, traditional politicians who were responsible for the party’s loss of power, while the opinions of young people are used merely for window dressing and to brighten the image of a “brilliant” party chairman, then one cannot but wonder if the party will ever make a comeback.
Niu Tse-hsun is a professor at Chinese Culture University’s Department of Advertising.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS