The election of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) Central Committee members concluded not long ago. According to the KMT, 39 younger party members were elected, compared with 26 in the previous election, accounting for about 19 percent of the 210 committee members.
Moreover, some middle-aged politicians were elected, including legislators Wayne Chiang (蔣萬安), 39, and Johnny Chiang (江啟臣), 45, as well as Sean Lien (連勝文), 47, and Kao Su-po (高思博), 49, who both intend to stand in local government elections next year.
A KMT spokesman might have exaggerated the outcome, saying it reflected how the party is “gradually getting younger,” but perhaps there is the possibility of a rising younger generation inside the party.
However, it remains to be seen whether such a force could reverse the traditional thinking of KMT Chairman Wu Den-yih (吳敦義) and the old guard and become a dominant force, as they face several obstacles.
First, as President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) approval rating continued to plummet, she was forced to save herself by appointing former Tainan mayor William Lai (賴清德) as premier.
Tsai is clearly taking a gamble in which she and Lai will rise or fall together, in the hope that it will reverse the unfavorable situation facing her administration and improve the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) chances in next year’s elections.
Her administration’s difficulties present an opportunity to the KMT. The network of factions within the party, which had fallen apart, is now coming back to life as they try to get close to Wu, as if another power transfer was about to occur and they were about to re-enter the corridors of power.
As these traditional conservative forces take credit for Wu, it is unlikely that he would ignore them and instead support rising middle-aged or younger party members, allowing them to dominate the party’s reform process.
Next, a number of the KMT’s active younger and middle-aged politicians are “second-generation politicians” who have long benefited from the power and connections of their parents.
Not all of the party’s second-generation politicians rely on their parents, but they have been influenced by that generation’s traditional ideologies and might avoid hurting their parents’ connections, making it difficult for them to push for party reform.
If newcomers who lack money and connections really want to shine, they will have to rely on the second-generation politicians to take them along for the ride and offer them more exposure.
However, after finally getting the chance to be heard thanks to the second-generation politicians, they will owe them a debt of gratitude and will therefore be unlikely to push for drastic reform.
Finally, looking at Wu’s personnel philosophy and his own personality, he seldom takes public opinion into consideration when making decisions.
For example, when former KMT chairwoman Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) unexpectedly stepped down, Wu fell short of public expectations, as he refused to take over the chairmanship a few weeks early. Besides, he is extremely confident in himself.
How could a self-proclaimed brilliant party chairman give priority to the opinions of young or middle-aged party members when pushing for reform?
Is the party’s policy of putting middle-aged people in important positions while cultivating younger members going to exist in name only? We will have to wait and see what happens.
The rising number of young Central Committee members is an opportunity for the aging KMT. By contrast, the DPP has already completed a generational transition and is dominated by middle-aged politicians, while almost 70 percent of the New Power Party’s (NPP) top officials are under the age of 40.
The KMT is far behind them: Young party members only account for one-fifth of the total number of Central Committee seats.
Today, both the DPP and the NPP are actively attracting young voters by nominating younger candidates in elections.
If the KMT continues to be dominated by the old-fashioned, traditional politicians who were responsible for the party’s loss of power, while the opinions of young people are used merely for window dressing and to brighten the image of a “brilliant” party chairman, then one cannot but wonder if the party will ever make a comeback.
Niu Tse-hsun is a professor at Chinese Culture University’s Department of Advertising.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS