‘No’ to nuclear deterrents
Chen Shih-min’s (陳世民) Taipei Times story is irresponsible and dangerous (“Likelihood of nuclear deterrent in Taiwan,” Sept. 16, page 8).
There is no need for Taiwan to have nuclear weapons.
One obvious reason is that one nuclear weapon is enough to destroy the planet. So, the solution is not to increase the number of nations with nuclear weapons — which would increase the number of nuclear weapons in the world, which would increase the risk of a launch, which would, in turn, increase the risk that all 7.5 billion of us will die.
The solution is to use diplomacy to rid the world of nuclear weapons: This can be done.
North Korea can be negotiated with. In the 1990s, then-US president Bill Clinton sent former US president Jimmy Carter to North Korea. He negotiated a halt to North Korea’s weapons program in exchange for fuel.
However, former US president George W. Bush did away with the deal, and North Korea resumed its program.
Bush later said that he would defend Taiwan against China, but Taiwan and the world would have been safer if he had just kept the Clinton deal in place.
Chen writes: “North Korea’s nuclear weapons development program appears to have progressed rapidly in a short time and there is a real possibility that it will soon be able to strike the US.”
This statement is untrue.
Yes, there was a recent earthquake in North Korea that Pyongyang claims was the result of an underground test detonation of a thermonuclear or hydrogen bomb. A second quake followed, which it claims was caused by the collapse of the cavern where the weapons test was conducted.
However, according to Robert Kelley, the former director of nuclear inspections of the International Atomic Energy Agency, it is highly unlikely that North Korea’s claims are true.
Kelley, who has 35 years of experience in nuclear weapons, stated several reasons why North Korea’s claims are unreliable:
First, any time North Korea claims anything, it is unreliable.
Second, the earthquake could have been caused by an explosion that was not from a nuclear weapon.
Third, if its claims were true, then small amounts of radiation might have been released from the collapsed cavern. None has been detected.
Fourth, Pyongyang released a photo of Kim Jong-un looking at a device that it claims is their weapon of mass destruction.
According to Kelley, who saw that photo and others, there are flaws in the device, which casts doubts on its authenticity.
Fifth, according to Kelley, North Korea does not have a single missile that can reach America with any accuracy. They only have the ability to reach or fly over Japan.
Even then, they do not have the ability to track or guide their missiles. In other words, the US is in no danger of a North Korean attack.
Finally, Chen plays the China card. China and Taiwan have not had a battle for more than 35 years. No evidence suggests they will go to war any time soon.
Neither war nor nuclear weapons are the way for Taiwan to protect itself or stand on the world stage. Taiwan needs to project its soft power, like the recent Taipei Summer Universiade as just one example.
Andres Chang
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS