During her election campaign, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) pledged to double state funding for sports within eight years. Following this year’s Taipei Summer Universiade, Tsai further promised to allocate a budget of NT$10 billion (US$332.2 million) over the next four years to support developing sports in Taiwan by investing in human and physical resources, teaching, training, prizes and subsidies.
However, no mention was made about resolving the long-standing problem of assistance for athletes who have retired from competition.
Just after the Universiade, a “Taiwan’s heroes parade” was held in Taipei to honor the nation’s athletes, drawing big crowds of onlookers onto the streets. However, now that the spectacle is over, has there been any improvement in future prospects for outstanding athletes?
If it is unclear what job opportunities athletes will eventually have, how can parents feel confident about supporting and encouraging their children to enter the world of sports? If not enough people train to compete in sports, how will Taiwan be able to make its presence felt at international sporting events?
When Taiwanese athletes win medals, the government and public are eager to give them extra honors and rewards, but when those same athletes really need help to find employment, no such help is forthcoming.
Research has shown that outstanding athletes have much in common with successful businesspeople. Athletes have greater-than-average potential for doing well in business due to their devotion and perseverance. This potential is recognized by the Singaporean government, for example, which brings together government and schools to provide assistance to retired athletes, offering them guidance, advice and courses.
The government should offer substantial help to athletes who have made such strenuous contributions and retired from competition. For example, depending on how great a contribution they have made to the nation, they could be provided with interest-free or low-interest start-up business loans.
Retired athletes should be guaranteed positions as full-time sports coaches in schools, where they can foster Taiwan’s sporting talent. This idea, which would form a positive cycle of personnel management, has long been discussed, but never implemented.
Coaches are like legendary horse trainer Bole (伯樂) during the Spring and Autumn Period. As talented as athletes are, they could never become medal-winning racehorses without a coach’s sharp-eyed selection and skillful training. The existing system of full-time coaches in schools has been in place for decades, but funding remains insufficient.
As the saying goes: “Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.”
Society should encourage outstanding athletes to apply their hardworking and determined spirit and personal characteristics to become future entrepreneurs, thus forming a virtuous cycle in which they can give back to the society that supported them and the sporting world that nurtured them.
Legend says that a horse that Bole picked for Duke Mu of Qin (秦穆公) would never have become such a fine steed if Bole had not been there to spot it.
The nation must let retired athletes give full play to their strengths. When these modern-day Boles enjoy stable pay, conditions and work environments, they will be more able to focus on discovering, teaching and training the next generation of fine steeds — great performances in international competitions and Olympic medals will naturally follow.
Charles Yu is an associate professor at National Chung Hsing University’s Graduate Institute of Sports Health and Management.
Translated by Julian Clegg
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS