During her election campaign, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) pledged to double state funding for sports within eight years. Following this year’s Taipei Summer Universiade, Tsai further promised to allocate a budget of NT$10 billion (US$332.2 million) over the next four years to support developing sports in Taiwan by investing in human and physical resources, teaching, training, prizes and subsidies.
However, no mention was made about resolving the long-standing problem of assistance for athletes who have retired from competition.
Just after the Universiade, a “Taiwan’s heroes parade” was held in Taipei to honor the nation’s athletes, drawing big crowds of onlookers onto the streets. However, now that the spectacle is over, has there been any improvement in future prospects for outstanding athletes?
If it is unclear what job opportunities athletes will eventually have, how can parents feel confident about supporting and encouraging their children to enter the world of sports? If not enough people train to compete in sports, how will Taiwan be able to make its presence felt at international sporting events?
When Taiwanese athletes win medals, the government and public are eager to give them extra honors and rewards, but when those same athletes really need help to find employment, no such help is forthcoming.
Research has shown that outstanding athletes have much in common with successful businesspeople. Athletes have greater-than-average potential for doing well in business due to their devotion and perseverance. This potential is recognized by the Singaporean government, for example, which brings together government and schools to provide assistance to retired athletes, offering them guidance, advice and courses.
The government should offer substantial help to athletes who have made such strenuous contributions and retired from competition. For example, depending on how great a contribution they have made to the nation, they could be provided with interest-free or low-interest start-up business loans.
Retired athletes should be guaranteed positions as full-time sports coaches in schools, where they can foster Taiwan’s sporting talent. This idea, which would form a positive cycle of personnel management, has long been discussed, but never implemented.
Coaches are like legendary horse trainer Bole (伯樂) during the Spring and Autumn Period. As talented as athletes are, they could never become medal-winning racehorses without a coach’s sharp-eyed selection and skillful training. The existing system of full-time coaches in schools has been in place for decades, but funding remains insufficient.
As the saying goes: “Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.”
Society should encourage outstanding athletes to apply their hardworking and determined spirit and personal characteristics to become future entrepreneurs, thus forming a virtuous cycle in which they can give back to the society that supported them and the sporting world that nurtured them.
Legend says that a horse that Bole picked for Duke Mu of Qin (秦穆公) would never have become such a fine steed if Bole had not been there to spot it.
The nation must let retired athletes give full play to their strengths. When these modern-day Boles enjoy stable pay, conditions and work environments, they will be more able to focus on discovering, teaching and training the next generation of fine steeds — great performances in international competitions and Olympic medals will naturally follow.
Charles Yu is an associate professor at National Chung Hsing University’s Graduate Institute of Sports Health and Management.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS