Much was hidden from the tourists visiting Sinet Chan in her rundown Cambodian orphanage. When they returned to their hotels, cameras full and best intentions sated, they remained oblivious to the reality of what they had just supported.
Chan, the nine-year-old who sang and danced for them, was being starved. She and the other children hunted and ate mice to survive. The orphanage’s director beat and raped her, repeatedly, over the course of several years. She was forced to toil in his rice paddies and farms without pay. Clothes and toys donated to her would be taken to the market, sold, and used to line the director’s pockets.
“I thought it might be a good place. Maybe I could have enough food to eat, have a chance to go to school, but actually what I imagined is wrong,” said Chan, who is now an adult. “He dressed us up looking poor so the visitors see us, they feel pity for us and they donate more, but they don’t really know what was going on inside the orphanage.”
Illustration: Mountain People
What the tourists saw was a pantomime. A cruel theater with vulnerable children as its cast.
Chan was one child of about 16,500 living in 406 residential care institutions in Cambodia, according to a survey released in April by the Cambodian government and UNICEF.
The vast majority of those children are not orphans. About 80 percent still have a living parent, according to Friends International, a child-focused non-governmental organization (NGO) operating across Southeast Asia.
From 2005 to 2015, the number of orphanages has increased by 60 percent in Cambodia and half are now concentrated in the tourist destinations of Phnom Penh and Siem Reap.
The growth in orphanages is completely at odds with a declining poverty rate and falling numbers of genuine orphans over the same decade, Friends International’s Cambodian communications coordinator James Sutherland said.
“Coincidentally that was a period of real growth in tourism as well and in ‘voluntourism’ — combining holidays with humanitarian work,” Sutherland said from Cambodia’s capital, Phnom Penh. “So essentially what’s happened is that unscrupulous directors of institutions have seen a business opportunity.”
It s a problem that extends well beyond Cambodia’s borders. An estimated 8 million children live in institutions globally and the vast majority still have family who, given the right support, could care for them.
MONEY TRAIL
Australians are among the top financial supporters of orphanages in many Southeast Asian countries, including Cambodia, according to UNICEF.
Australia props up the industry through volunteers, donations and tourist visits, arranged by Australian travel agencies, charities, churches, universities, or high schools.
“Despite their good intentions, supporters of orphanages such as tourists and volunteers actually end up contributing to the breaking up of families and removing children from their own family environment,” UNICEF’s Cambodian communications chief Iman Morooka said.
The support from Australia’s faith-based groups, mostly Christian and some Islamic groups, is overwhelming.
Guardian Australia has been given as-yet unpublished research showing the true extent of religious support for orphanages. It shows that 51 percent of all church attendees in Australia are contributing funding to institutional care overseas.
About one-quarter were providing the funding through a Christian agency or charity, while another 21 percent did so through their local churches.
The study was organized by ACCI Relief, a Christian charity, which commissioned a report through the national church life survey, a study of 20 Christian denominations, 3,000 local churches, 270,000 adult and child attendees and 6,000 laypeople and clergy.
ACCI Relief’s international programs chief executive Rebecca Nhep said it was the first clear picture of the level of religious support for foreign orphanages.
“Huge — it’s absolutely huge,” Nhep said. “We knew anecdotally that that was the case, but this is the first time that we’ve seen quantitative data to show it.”
Australian universities that offer volunteer placements and high schools are also significant contributors
A research project conducted by Griffith University law and human trafficking expert Kate van Doore last year found that 57.5 percent of Australian universities were advertising orphanage placements through international volunteer programs.
Between 4.35 percent and 15.61 percent of public schools fund-raised or took trips to orphanages, varying across Australian state and territories.
Australian NGOs and charities are also big players. About 245 registered NGOs directly funded or sent volunteers to residential care institutions, while 565 Australian charities were involved with or operated residential care institutions overseas.
Australian-based travel agencies market orphanage placements as “voluntourism,” a blend of holiday and volunteering sold to well-intentioned travelers.
Van Doore and her team found 22 Australian-based travel agencies or organizations that send volunteers to residential care centers. Another 61 overseas-based travel agencies were found to be recruiting Australian volunteers to work in residential care.
“I think people who are supporting orphanages, whether they’re funding or volunteering, generally have excellent intentions,” Van Doore said. “Unfortunately it’s those very good intentions that are being manipulated in these instances.”
It is not just foreign support that props up the orphanages.
The phenomenon is driven by complex factors in Cambodia like poverty, economic migration and disability.
However, orphanages there are now replacing more traditional forms of kinship care and community-based care as a means of caring for orphaned children. To sustain the business, children are “recruited” from poor families with promises of education and a better life. Some are trafficked.
Many orphanages deliberately market themselves as tourist destinations. Children are kept looking poor and malnourished and taught to sing or dance to maximize pity and Western donations. Often, visiting adults are allowed to take children on unaccompanied trips away from the orphanage.
“We see orphanages that have become tourist attractions and in many cases there is no rigorous background check of those given access to the facility,” Morooka said. “This puts children at risk of exploitation and sexual abuse.”
A growing body of evidence suggests that, even where they are well-run, orphanages are damaging for children. Children tend to be more likely to develop reactive attachment disorders, developmental delays, behavioral issues, poor physical health and reduced intellectual capability compared with those living at home.
A PATH FORWARD
The momentum for change is building in Cambodia and Australia.
In Australia, efforts are focused on pressuring the federal government to ban orphanage tourism.
Reputable NGOs, charities and travel companies have formed an alliance, known as ReThink Orphanages, to lobby the government.
They are also trying to raise awareness among smaller charities, schools and universities.
The aim is not to cut off precious donations and volunteers, but to redirect them to reunification and reintegration services, which link children back with their families.
Sutherland said reducing the demand from the West is critical to ending orphanages in places like Cambodia.
“Most tourists, donors and volunteers are simply unaware of the facts, of the scale of the exploitation that is happening,” Sutherland said. “Unscrupulous orphanage directors know that if you open hearts, you also open wallets.”
There is real hope that the Australian government could soon take decisive action on orphanage tourism.
A parliamentary inquiry into the establishment of a modern slavery act is considering banning Australian support for orphanages in places such as Cambodia.
In an effort to convince Australian politicians, Chan traveled to Canberra this week to give evidence before the committee.
She told the inquiry of how an Australian, Tara Winkler, rescued her, after initially working at the orphanage as a volunteer.
Winkler soon realized the extent of exploitation occurring within the orphanage.
“I began to realize the gross corruption that was going on, that every cent that was being sent to the orphanage, not just from me, was being embezzled by the director and the kids were often catching mice to feed themselves,” she said.
Winkler rescued 14 children with the help of the Cambodian government and set up her own orphanage. She soon realized opening her own institution was a mistake. The children, once away from the orphanage, began to open up.
They told Winkler their parents were still alive.
Winkler gradually realized the extent of the problem and created the Cambodian Children’s Trust, which helps to reunite children in orphanages with their families.
“I think it’s really important for people to remember, in Cambodia, the poverty rate has been in steady decline, the number of orphans as well, and yet the number of orphanages has skyrocketed,” she said. “The heartbreaking thing is that it’s all done with such good intentions ... well, mostly. [However], they’re literally causing the trafficking of these children from their families into these institutions. When people find that out, that’s a jagged little pill to swallow.”
A significant proportion of Cambodia’s orphanage network is operating without scrutiny. The Cambodian government-UNICEF survey this year found 12 percent were not registered with the state, meaning they operate completely off the radar.
About 38 percent have never been inspected by the government and 21 percent have no agreement with the government in place.
The Cambodian government is now working with UNICEF and Friends International to deal with the problem, a partnership called 3PC.
The partnership involves 50 Cambodian child welfare and protection NGOs, who work to reintegrate children with their families, while providing medical and psychological services, family support and transitional care.
The Cambodian Ministry of Social Affairs, Veterans and Youth Rehabilitation has set a target of reintegrating 30 percent of children back into their families and communities in five priority provinces by the end of next year.
A stricter registration and monitoring regime is being put in place, and the government and NGOs are pressing orphanages to transition into community-based support services.
Chan is trying to build a positive life for herself.
She works as a scriptwriter on a Cambodian television show and as an ambassador for Winkler’s trust, recounting her story again and again to try to prompt change.
“I think for people around the world, there is no better place like home,” Chan said. “You live with your family. You have your mum and dad, your brother and sister, if you have that kind of family, why do they need to go to live in the orphanage?”
“I think if they want to help Cambodian children to have a good future or better education, better to have a poor parent that can look after their own kid and they can have support on top of that,” she said.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) last week announced that the KMT was launching “Operation Patriot” in response to an unprecedented massive campaign to recall 31 KMT legislators. However, his action has also raised questions and doubts: Are these so-called “patriots” pledging allegiance to the country or to the party? While all KMT-proposed campaigns to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers have failed, and a growing number of local KMT chapter personnel have been indicted for allegedly forging petition signatures, media reports said that at least 26 recall motions against KMT legislators have passed the second signature threshold
The Central Election Commission (CEC) on Friday announced that recall motions targeting 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) have been approved, and that a recall vote would take place on July 26. Of the recall motions against 35 KMT legislators, 31 were reviewed by the CEC after they exceeded the second-phase signature thresholds. Twenty-four were approved, five were asked to submit additional signatures to make up for invalid ones and two are still being reviewed. The mass recall vote targeting so many lawmakers at once is unprecedented in Taiwan’s political history. If the KMT loses more
Taiwan’s unconditional support “for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India to safeguard national security and fight terrorist forces that cross borders to attack innocent civilians” marked a monumental shift in the relationship between Taipei and New Delhi. At a time when the Indian government sent several delegations of parliament members to convey to the rest of the world Pakistan’s role in sponsoring terrorism against India, Taiwan became one of the few nations that unequivocally supported India’s military operation, “Sindhoor.” Sure, this change in bilateral ties did not happen in a vacuum. Over the past decade,
RSS