At an event to mark the 20th anniversary of Hong Kong’s handover to China, Chinese president Xi Jinping (習近平) — who is also Chinese Communist Party (CCP) general secretary and chairman of the Central Military Commission, with power over the nation’s government as well as its military — shamelessly bragged about Hong Kong’s “world-recognized achievements.”
His words served as an ironic contrast to Hong Kongers’ calls for independence.
Under British colonial rule, Hong Kong became very different from China. As a result, the Chinese government had no choice but to promote the “one country, two systems” framework when it took over the territory.
However, now that the territory has become a part of China, Beijing completely reneged upon its promise. The territory has since become difficult for Hong Kongers to live in: While some decided to leave, some stayed in the hope of changing things for the better.
Fifty-two years before Hong Kong’s handover, Taiwan celebrated its return to China after World War II ended 50 years of Japanese rule in the region. Following its defeat by the CCP in China, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) fled to Taiwan and occupied the former Japanese colony.
Under the KMT, Taiwanese have endured the 228 Massacre, the White Terror era and the decades-long Martial Law period and eventually realized that they needed to take control of their own destiny — and that was the beginning of Taiwanese independence movement.
Both Taiwan and Hong Kong were severed from China during the Qing Dynasty and ceded to Japan and Britain, respectively. Under Japanese and British colonial rule, Taiwan and Hong Kong became very different from China.
A major difference between China’s political system — as seen in the KMT and CCP governments — and that of Japan’s and Britain’s is the latter’s adherence to the rule of the law. The rule of law is a basic requirement for civilized nations. That China, which claims to be the motherland of Taiwan and Hong Kong, fails to meet this basic requirement has made it impossible for Taiwanese and Hong Kongers to identify with it.
Beijing’s feelings toward Taiwan and Hong Kong are mixed with bitterness, as it resents that they have been ruled by foreign nations.
Despite euphemisms such as “the recovery of Taiwan” or Hong Kong’s “return to the motherland,” the KMT and Beijing really thought of Taiwan and Hong Kong as places to conquer.
However, the legal and judicial systems that developed in Taiwan and Hong Kong during their colonial eras have made it difficult for the successor to do whatever it wanted. The new government’s complete disregard for law soon sparked outrage among Taiwanese and Hong Kongers.
China’s political culture is rotten to the core. In the name of “recovering” and “returning to the motherland,” both Taiwan and Hong Kong have fallen into the hands of authoritarians. Despite Beijing’s attempts to create the illusion that China, Taiwan and Hong Kong are one country, they are fundamentally different from each other.
The more civilized way would be to allow Taiwan and Hong Kong to become separate nations while remaining a part of the Chinese cultural circle.
China is enormous. It does not need Taiwan and Hong Kong, as one is a small island and the other is a small peninsula. If Beijing would let them become independent, it might feel relieved and even be able to improve its international reputation. Moreover, the Han culture that connects them would continue to thrive in Taiwan and Hong Kong.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
When a recall campaign targeting the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators was launched, something rather disturbing happened. According to reports, Hualien County Government officials visited several people to verify their signatures. Local authorities allegedly used routine or harmless reasons as an excuse to enter people’s house for investigation. The KMT launched its own recall campaigns, targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers, and began to collect signatures. It has been found that some of the KMT-headed counties and cities have allegedly been mobilizing municipal machinery. In Keelung, the director of the Department of Civil Affairs used the household registration system