Forget Machiavelli, or Game of Thrones. When it comes to staying in power, South Korea’s richest business clans have the game plan down.
There is the charity maneuver, in which family members park their stakes in their business empires in philanthropic nonprofits, letting them keep control without paying heavy taxes.
There is the new company maneuver, in which they create new firms that strike lucrative and friendly business deals with the others they control.
And then there is old-fashioned corporate engineering, in which they merge arms of their empires together to consolidate power, even as other shareholders complain.
With South Korea’s biggest business empire, Samsung, caught up in a nationwide political scandal, a new generation of South Korean leaders has vowed to rip up that playbook.
Major candidates in Tuesday’s election for president have said they would clamp down on South Korea’s family-controlled business empires, called chaebol, which dominate the country’s economy and have amassed immense political power.
“Chaebol family control as we know it could end with this generation,” said Kim Woo-chan, a professor of finance at Seoul-based Korea University Business School, pointing to an intensifying backlash against inherited wealth. “An opportunity as good as this one is unprecedented.”
However, that could be easier said than done, South Korean officials and experts have said.
While the public blames the chaebol for an embarrassing series of political and business scandals and for holding back the country’s once surging economy, they continue to hold considerable political power. Their controlling families have also proved adept at finding ways to keep control, even as they face increasing challenges from inheritance taxes, unhappy outside investors and their own family squabbling.
“Leaders, markets — they don’t change overnight,” said Rhyu Sang-young, a professor of political economy at Yonsei University in Seoul. “Every culture has a strong legacy, inertia. It takes time.”
South Korean President Moon Jae-in, sworn in yesterday, has vowed to stop families from using nonprofit foundations, complicated shareholding plans and other methods to keep control of businesses. One of his main advisers is Kim Sang-jo, an economist known for hawkish views on the chaebol.
However, the South Korean Democratic Party, led by Moon, holds only 119 seats in the 300-member South Korean National Assembly. The Democrats would find it hard to get support from rival parties in passing chaebol reform bills through a fractured legislature, where a pro-business lobby also remains strong.
Passing a bill would take many months of wrangling.
Moon has also promised to make prosecutors more independent and to make it more difficult for a president to abuse the power of the office, limiting the ability of chaebol to collude with officials and escape justice. However, such reforms would likely require a revision of the constitution, which would be very difficult to pull off given the nation’s fractious politics.
Mounting distrust of the chaebol culminated earlier this year in the arrest and indictment of Jay Y. Lee, Samsung’s de facto chief, on bribery and other charges related to a scandal that ousted South Korea’s president and led to Tuesday’s election.
Lee is a member of the third generation of a family that controls a business empire that makes its famous mobile phones; builds the world’s tallest skyscrapers — an affiliate constructed the Burj Khalifa in Dubai; operates hospitals, hotels and theme parks; and even offers credit cards.
However, frustration with the chaebol has been building for years. Critics blame the conglomerates for a number of social ills, including corruption, inequality and the crowding out of smaller and potentially more innovative businesses.
Shares in the chaebol trade at lower prices than they otherwise would — the so-called “Korea Discount” — because outside investors fear founding families will shortchange them.
Family shenanigans have not helped perceptions.
There was Cho Hyun-ah, daughter of the chairman of Korean Air’s chaebol, who resigned from an executive position at the carrier in 2014 over the infamous “nut rage” incident, in which she forced an airplane to return to the gate when she was unhappy with the way a flight attendant served her macadamia nuts.
There was Chey Chul-won, a member of the family that runs SK Group, who was convicted of beating a protester with a baseball bat.
Then there was Chung Il-seon, a Hyundai heir who runs the group’s steelmaking affiliate, who was fined by a court for abusing a string of chauffeurs.
Over the long term, many chaebol families have seen their grip on their empires slip. Often, the families have only themselves to blame. A succession fight between siblings broke up Hyundai in the early 2000s.
Lotte, another chaebol, went through an ugly war between brothers in 2015.
The winner, Shin Dong-bin, might have seized a poisoned chalice: He has also been indicted on charges of bribing South Korea’s recently deposed president, Park Geun-hye.
They face other challenges — in particular, taxes. Perhaps surprisingly in a country where dynasties have persisted, inheritance taxes in South Korea are high — for the wealthy, 50 percent or more.
That is where the power preservation playbook comes in.
One solution has been to transfer stakes in chaebol companies to family-controlled charities. Four foundations controlled by the Lee family hold billions of dollars worth of shares in key Samsung subsidiaries, including the smartphone maker.
Another option is to ensure that chaebol heirs get rich before their parents die. That can be accomplished by setting up small companies under an heir’s control, then making them bigger using the family’s business connections.
Critics have said that is what happened at Hyundai Motor, where Chung Eui-sun, the son of the automaker’s chairman, invested in a small logistics company in 2001.
The company, now called Hyundai Glovis, quickly secured lucrative contracts with Hyundai affiliates. Within a few years Hyundai Glovis and Chung were worth billions.
A Hyundai spokeswoman declined to comment on the arrangement.
Lee, who is technically vice chairman, but leads Samsung on behalf of his ill father, also benefited from maneuvers designed to preserve family power. Starting in 1996, when Lee was just 28, Samsung companies began issuing him cut-price bonds that he was later able to convert into stock, allowing him to accumulate valuable ownership stakes at a fraction of the market cost.
His father, Lee Kun-hee, was ultimately convicted of breach of trust in connection with the deals — although he was later pardoned and Jay Lee was allowed to keep his shares.
Another maneuver is at the heart of the charges against him. The merger of two Samsung companies in 2015 made Jay Lee the dominant shareholder in a crucial part of the Samsung empire. Earlier this year, he was accused of bribing Park and others to push another major shareholder, the government’s pension system, to approve the deal.
Jay Lee denies the charges and has said he was a victim of extortion.
Outside shareholders, who could be a point of pressure, still do not have a big voice. Many chaebol companies have long been publicly traded, but their size and success has drawn outside investors who clamor for a greater say and better governance.
In the case of Samsung, US hedge fund Elliott Associates objected to the deal that led to the bribery charges against Jay Lee. However, the hedge fund failed to block it.
“South Korea has to promote the role of the institutional investor,” Rhyu said, adding that the pension service lacked a culture of independence. “The problem is corporate governance.”
In the legislature, political parties have sponsored several bills that would make chaebol corporate governance more transparent and make it harder for their chairmen to help enrich their children through dubious business transactions.
One idea pushed by Moon is to introduce so-called cumulative voting to make it easier for candidates supported by minority shareholders to get a board seat.
However, any campaign to overhaul the chaebol would be vulnerable to overall economics. If the economy slows, politicians might fear that constraining the chaebol would hurt business activity.
“There are people who recognize the problem, but also a lot who don’t,” Kim Woo-chan said. “There are plenty of people who think, yes, there has to be an owner family involved.”
As it has striven toward superiority in most measures of the Asian military balance, China is now ready to challenge the undersea balance of power, long dominated by the United States, a decisive advantage crucial to its ability to deter blockade and invasion of Taiwan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). America expended enormous treasure to develop the technology, logistics, training, and personnel to emerge victorious in the Cold War undersea struggle against the former Soviet Union, and to remain superior today; the US is not used to considering the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN)
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
President William Lai’s (賴清德) first Double Ten National Day address had two strategic goals. For domestic affairs, the speech aimed to foster consensus on national identity, strengthen the country and unite the Taiwanese against a Chinese invasion. In terms of cross-strait relations, the speech aimed to mitigate tensions in the Taiwan Strait and promote the coexistence and prosperity of the People’s Republic of China (PRC) in China and the Republic of China (ROC). Lai is taking a different stance from previous Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administrations on domestic political issues. During his speech, he said: “The PRC could not be the
RSS