Stephon Marbury, a former NBA point guard who has forged a second career in the Chinese Basketball Association, says he enjoys being a celebrity expatriate in Beijing.
“This is home away from home and I’m loving it,” he wrote in a recent Twitter message that accompanied a video of him eating at a Chinese hot pot restaurant.
Marbury, 40, is one of 1,576 foreigners granted permanent residency in China last year. That figure represents a 163 percent year-on-year increase in a residency program that began in 2004, according to reports in the Chinese state news media.
China has generally issued a few hundred permanent residency cards per year, and the recent uptick illustrates how authorities are seeking to attract more foreign investors and celebrities, even though most recipients are still ethnically Chinese, analysts said.
For many other foreigners in China, they said, residency restrictions have increased since 2013, when a landmark immigration law took effect, and the residency program remains exceedingly small for a country of 1.3 billion people with about 600,000 foreign residents.
By contrast, the US with its population of about 324 million granted more than 1 million green cards in 2015, according to government data.
China’s immigration policies are contradictory in that they prioritize attracting foreign talent to increase economic modernization while reflecting a deep-rooted instinct to keep foreigners at arm’s length, said Frank Pieke, a professor of modern China studies at Leiden University in the Netherlands.
The policies, much like those of Japan and South Korea, were “predicated on a very strong nation-state that defines itself as the home of a particular ethnic and cultural group that wants to maintain its purity and wants to let in only what it really, really desperately needs,” he said.
China’s 2013 law was the first major overhaul of its national immigration policy since 1985 and helped to lay the foundation for a raft of new residency rules in the nation’s major cities.
In Shanghai, a 2015 rule relaxed the criteria for residency eligibility for local foreign residents, said Becky Xia, a Shanghai-based partner at Fragomen, an international immigration law firm.
Although applicants must still show four years of residency and a yearly salary of at least 600,000 yuan (US$87,307), she said, the new rule no longer requires them to be top executives.
Xia said that Fragomen had seen a 50 percent increase over the last year in clients seeking help with residency applications and most were Europeans in the information technology sector who oversee manufacturing in China.
She expects the number of residency cards issued in China to rise, partly because foreigners in business who have passed China’s retirement age — 60 for men and 55 for white-collar women — are not eligible for work visas and could apply for residency instead.
From an employer’s perspective: “I would think there are more options for getting the talent you want,” she said of Shanghai’s new rules.
She added that residency cards, unlike work permits, were not tied to employment contracts and were valid for renewable 10-year terms.
However, Chinese immigration and residency policies that have been in effect since 2013 have also become more restrictive toward less-valued workers, especially the African traders and entrepreneurs who have settled in Guangzhou since the early 2000s, often by overstaying their visas, experts said.
Gordon Mathews, an anthropologist at the Chinese University of Hong Kong who has studied communities of Nigerian traders in Guangzhou, said that police there had cracked down on people who had overstayed their visas after dozens of Africans, mostly from Nigeria and Mali, were arrested in an August 2013 drug raid.
Mathews said that many African and Arab traders in Guangzhou overstayed their visas because the official limit on their stays — typically two weeks or a month — often did not provide enough time to commission a factory order and see it through to completion.
The government appears unwilling to loosen that rule, he added, and foreign traders who obtain legal residence permits are generally limited to one-year stays with no guarantee of renewal, even if they have Chinese spouses or children.
“The whole issue is: Can foreigners become Chinese?” he said. “Yes, I know there’s a green card system and so on, but on the ground, it appears doubtful.”
China also has a naturalization process for foreigners. This month, the state news media reported that two prominent Chinese-born scientists had given up their US citizenship to become Chinese citizens: 1957 Nobel Prize winner in physics Chen Ning Yang (楊振寧) and Andrew Chi-Chih Yao (姚期智), winner of the AM Turing Award for computer science in 2000. Both are professors at Tsinghua University in Beijing and members of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.
However, successful cases are extremely rare, and a new work permit system has placed restrictions on which foreigners will be allowed to work in China.
The system, which came into effect in November last year in nine cities and provinces, aims to build an information-driven economy by “encouraging the top, controlling the middle and limiting the bottom” of the pool of foreign workers, the state news media reported. It is scheduled to go nationwide in April.
In practice, the law makes it extremely difficult for workers on the lowest tier to obtain work permits, Chinese University of Hong Kong assistant law professor Mimi Zou (鄒密密) said.
Demographers predict that China may eventually face widespread shortages of low-skilled workers and that a more liberal immigration policy could help stabilize its economy in the long term, but because so many domestic migrants are still seeking work across the country, Zou said, the government has not yet considered creating a guest worker program for foreigners, an approach many developed countries have embraced.
She said China could eventually address labor shortages by bolstering its fertility rate, raising its retirement age or by investing in automation. Some of that investment is underway, she added, and Chinese companies are outsourcing some low-skilled production to other countries in Asia.
“But you obviously can’t outsource some jobs, such as domestic work,” she said in an e-mail.
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
RSS