When discussing distributive justice, late US philosopher and Harvard University professor John Rawls’ A Theory of Justice stands out as the most important work on the subject.
In his book, Rawls maintains that laws should be made behind a “veil of ignorance.” Liberalism argues that people originally lived in a natural state, but later decided to form societies to live together. This then led to the question of how to make laws in a way that ensures justice, as living together requires working out a social contract — laws — governing community members.
According to Rawls, to make just laws, those who take part in the legislative process must be completely blind to their own social background, political party, class and religion, as if they were making decisions behind a “veil of ignorance.”
In other words, all laws should be made behind this veil.
In reality, the method is impossible. Every lawmaker belongs to a political party and they more or less try to benefit themselves and harm their political enemies. Rawls of course understood that no lawmaker can become completely blind to facts about their own place in society, yet his concept of the veil of ignorance is an ideal that is well worth keeping in mind, and justice can be achieved by ensuring procedural justice.
Imagine lawmakers who know nothing about their own social backgrounds and political affiliations: If they were going to pass a bad law, they would worry about its negative effects on themselves. It is like dividing a cake: If the person dividing it will be the last to get a piece, they will definitely divide it as fairly as possible.
To a large extent, Taiwan owes its democracy today to the pioneers of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which has played an essential role in helping the nation build its democracy. For that reason, Taiwanese expect the members of the party, who today are enjoying its benefits, to have a superior understanding of democracy.
Unfortunately, since President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) took office nine months ago, her administration has been rather disappointing. Pension reform, for instance, has turned into a nationwide battle. How could that have happened?
The making and amendment of the pension laws are supposed to take place behind a veil of ignorance. However, the way several DPP politicians have openly talked about pension reform with pro-DPP commentators on TV shows is hardly any different from the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) anti-communism rhetoric in the past.
If they were truly behind a veil of ignorance, military personnel, civil servants and public-school teachers would not have been treated like enemies, because politicians would not know anything of their own background.
Two draft amendments and a draft bill to reform the pension system is to be sent to the Legislative Yuan for review next month. The DPP must keep in mind the veil of ignorance principle and not make the mistake of only identifying with its party and viewing all public-sector employees as KMT supporters — or even think that by hurting them it would consequentially hurt the KMT.
If legislators can adhere to the veil of ignorance principle, they will be able work together to make laws that are just and fair despite their varied political affiliations.
Hopefully the Tsai administration will be able to lead Taiwan toward becoming a better and even more democratic nation.
Allen Houng is a professor at National Yang Ming University’s Institute of Philosophy of Mind and Cognition.
Translated by Tu Yu-an
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Eating at a breakfast shop the other day, I turned to an old man sitting at the table next to mine. “Hey, did you hear that the Legislative Yuan passed a bill to give everyone NT$10,000 [US$340]?” I said, pointing to a newspaper headline. The old man cursed, then said: “Yeah, the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] canceled the NT$100 billion subsidy for Taiwan Power Co and announced they would give everyone NT$10,000 instead. “Nice. Now they are saying that if electricity prices go up, we can just use that cash to pay for it,” he said. “I have no time for drivel like
Young supporters of former Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) were detained for posting the names and photographs of judges and prosecutors believed to be overseeing the Core Pacific City redevelopment corruption case. The supporters should be held responsible for their actions. As for Ko’s successor, TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), he should reflect on whether his own comments are provocative and whether his statements might be misunderstood. Huang needs to apologize to the public and the judiciary. In the article, “Why does sorry seem to be the hardest word?” the late political commentator Nan Fang Shuo (南方朔) wrote
Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) reportedly told the EU’s top diplomat that China does not want Russia to lose in Ukraine, because the US could shift its focus to countering Beijing. Wang made the comment while meeting with EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy Kaja Kallas on July 2 at the 13th China-EU High-Level Strategic Dialogue in Brussels, the South China Morning Post and CNN reported. Although contrary to China’s claim of neutrality in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, such a frank remark suggests Beijing might prefer a protracted war to keep the US from focusing on
RSS