The year-end countdown is on. Many major events with far-reaching effects have occurred this year. In Asia, Taiwan’s presidential election led to a transition of government power that has changed the cross-strait dynamic; China has been stirring things up in the South China Sea and the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, Netherlands, issued a ruling on the Philippines’ case against China in their dispute; and the US presidential election ended with a result that will affect every nation in the region, adding new variables to political and economic relationships.
In this fast-changing environment, strong leadership has become necessary for any government that wants to win public support and calm voters.
Most Taiwanese probably started pinning their hopes and expectations on President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and her team on the evening of Jan. 16 rather than when she was sworn in on May 20, hoping that the Democratic Progressive Party’s return to power would help the nation regain the confidence it has lost over the past several years.
In the Economist’s “The World in 2017,” Tsai penned an article titled “Turning Taiwan Into a Tiger Again.” Taiwanese are waiting for the president to tell them how she will go about doing that.
For a nation, external war is less frightening than a lack of domestic leadership. When US president-elect Donald Trump reiterated his intention to scrap the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), he threw a curveball to the 11 nations that had already signed the agreement.
In response, Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe told Peruvian President Pedro Pablo Kuczynski at the APEC summit in Lima last month that he would continue to push for the TPP. Both houses of the Japanese National Diet have passed relevant laws and completed the ratification process.
Faced with new uncertainty, Abe unambiguously told lawmakers during a visit to the Diet before the vote that, regardless of whether the TPP takes effect, the domestic budget set aside for dealing with complementary measures addressing TPP membership would still be implemented, because they are necessary for Japan to boost its agricultural industry, increase agricultural exports and support the overseas expansion of small and medium-sized enterprises. This is clear and strong leadership.
While Japan’s ruling coalition holds a majority in both houses, Abe as party leader still went to the legislature to clarify things, showing that effective communication includes making decisions, addressing problems, keeping information transparent and shouldering responsibility.
If these things are done well, one’s own party, other political parties and the public will be persuaded and it will be possible to build collective support for government policy.
Looking at Taiwan’s government using the same example — the TPP — Tsai has said that Asia must fulfill its role as a leader of economic integration, and that Taiwan must continue to negotiate and expand bilateral trade agreements. The first point takes aim at Japan and ASEAN and depends on how the government follows up with practical diplomacy. The second point involves the government’s mastery of the art of negotiation in trade talks, as well as its ability to respond to domestic concerns over market deregulation.
However, the public still has not seen any practical action by the government to back its words and lay down the goals, steps and discipline that a modern government should have.
In the legislature, the opposition has taken political steps to make it clear that it will oppose deregulation of US pork imports and Japanese food imports once the government engages in bilateral trade talks next year.
The question is whether the government is ready to respond to this, because if it cannot handle these fundamental issues, any mention of bilateral trade talks is just that: empty talk.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is well aware that the US’ position is “no pork, no talk,” and it is also using Japanese food imports as leverage. After all, even former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said before he stepped down that when dealing with the international community, you always have to be reasonable.
In short, Taiwan should hurry to allow food imports from the five Japanese prefectures neighboring the 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant disaster. Japan is implementing point of origin and radiation certification, and Japanese food product inspections work well, so there is no need to maintain the import ban, lest Japan think that Taiwan is being unreasonable.
While the government plans to only allow imports from four prefectures surrounding Fukushima, the KMT sent men in black to disrupt public hearings and is mobilizing the public to place follow-up hearings under siege.
It is like Taipei Mayor Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) said: This is a scientific issue, and the main issue is whether the government’s safety inspections of food imports is comprehensive.
The government should do all it can to promote transparency in its decisionmaking process and offer explanations without being concerned over the trouble it might cause. From a perspective of international talks, this is a question of what Taiwan can manage to get in exchange.
Nevertheless, there are signs that as the government has run into problems, it is resorting to the old strategy of procrastinating in the hope that things might change. If this is the approach the it takes when dealing with domestic issues, how will it persuade the public that it has the courage and insight required to deal with the international community?
If the government is to turn Taiwan into a tiger again, it will not do so by talking and drawing up outlines: It is a fundamental matter of being able to handle matters the right way on a daily basis and continuously improving that ability. A few clever and correct actions can accumulate and build confidence, making the public willing to go along and create the force required to bring about change — only by taking action will there be progress. This is what differentiates a fierce tiger from a sickly old cat.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
When a recall campaign targeting the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators was launched, something rather disturbing happened. According to reports, Hualien County Government officials visited several people to verify their signatures. Local authorities allegedly used routine or harmless reasons as an excuse to enter people’s house for investigation. The KMT launched its own recall campaigns, targeting Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers, and began to collect signatures. It has been found that some of the KMT-headed counties and cities have allegedly been mobilizing municipal machinery. In Keelung, the director of the Department of Civil Affairs used the household registration system
RSS