A Taiwanese friend told me that she planned to work until the end of the month, finish the cases she was working on and then resign. I was very surprised to hear that. She was talented and good at her job, so I wondered why she did not want to stay.
I heard that she wanted to go abroad for at least one month to travel and hone her skills, but her employer would not give her that much time off work, so she decided to quit her job and make a new start at a different workplace after her vacation.
While reasonable from my friend’s point of view, her resignation represents a great loss of human resources for her employer.
Such a thing would be very unusual in Germany, where employers value skilled employees very highly, and labor relations are founded on long-term partnership.
If, after a six-month trial period, your employer feels that you are an asset, they offer attractive conditions to retain you. This means that talented employees are willing to stay with the company, where they are undoubtedly priceless to the firm.
German employers do not necessarily like young people, but when it comes to those who have shown themselves to be good workers, they are willing to offer favorable conditions, including reasonable vacations, to make sure that they are willing to stay.
That explains why German employers offer generous maternity leave and an average of 30 days vacation a year.
When Germans ask for time off, they usually get it, because their bosses are willing and employers are not allowed to offer money instead of time off.
Of course these favorable conditions were won through decades of bargaining between workers and their employers, and Germany also has dedicated labor courts that provide substantial safeguards for workers’ rights and interests.
Apart from the long-term efforts that have gone into establishing these conditions, they also show the importance that employers attach to ensuring that their workers remain in the service of the company.
In Taiwan, employees often come and go, even quitting their jobs just because they cannot get time off work, so that employers often need to look for replacement staff. This represents a bigger loss for employers than they would incur from giving people time off.
German workers get as many as 43 days’ vacation a year, including national holidays and statutory leave days. If every day off were such a great loss for employers, surely the German economy would have stalled long ago.
German employers and entrepreneurs are not careless spenders. What matters is that they notice and appreciate their skilled and talented employees.
With worker-friendly conditions in place, it is less common for skilled and talented workers to move from one employer to another. It is common for German engineers to stay with a company for 15 or 20 years.
Only if a company can retain its talent will it have the human resources needed to conduct research and development and keep improving its products and services.
Taiwan has plenty of highly talented people, as can be seen from the fact that it ranks No. 1 in invention exhibitions around the world. In this age of globalization and headhunting, Taiwanese companies should look beyond their narrow immediate interests.
If Taiwan lacks good corporate environments and systems, and if employers fail to spot and value outstanding employees and give full play to their talents, it can only result in the brain drain that Taiwan is suffering.
Liou Uie-liang is a former president of the Taiwan Association in Germany.
Translated by Julian Clegg
Taiwan is not an orphan nation in need of someone to adopt it. Taiwan is not a foundling nation wandering the streets of the world looking for a home. It is not even a poor waif of a nation unable to take care of itself in that same big, bad world. Finally, Taiwan is certainly not terra nullius, a nationless land that is open and waiting to be explored and possessed by those who dare. Taiwan is a mid-sized, democratic nation that by GDP, profitability, location and even microchip production punches far above its weight in its region and in international commerce.
When analyzing Taiwan-China tensions, most people assume that the leadership of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) consists of rational actors. Embedded within this belief are three further suppositions: First, Beijing would only launch an attack on Taiwan if it were in China’s national interest; second, it would only attack if the odds were overwhelmingly in its favor; and third, Chinese decisionmakers interpret information objectively and through the same lens as other actors. These assumptions have underpinned recent analyses — including by Minister of National Defense Chiu Kuo-cheng (邱國正) — concluding that there is no
Do you remember where you were last year at this time? Do you remember what it was like? Here in the leafy suburbs of Washington, D.C., we were in lock-down mode. The streets were bleak and empty. Schools, offices, malls, theaters, churches … all were closed. The essentials were in short supply. Grocery stores rationed the good stuff. Signs read: “One jumbo pack of toilet paper, two cartoons of eggs per family please!” Some days those signs mocked us from barren shelves. It was a lonely and anti-social time. Families and friends had to weigh the rewards of gathering together to celebrate Christmas
US-based diplomatic observers say that interaction between Taiwan and the US has grown in intensity over the past few months, falling short of establishing official relations. Although the interaction is still below the cabinet level because of Washington’s “one China” policy, these observers see a growing propensity in US political circles, across both sides of the aisle, to support Taiwan’s distinct political culture, the outstanding features of which are its vibrant democracy and respect for human rights, along with a thriving economy. The question often debated in academic and foreign policy research circles is whether the US would put boots on
RSS