Aug. 15 just passed a few days ago. What is so special about that?
Aug. 15, 1945, was the day Japan surrendered, effectively ending World War II. In Japan, it marks the end of the war; South Korea calls it Liberation Day; and, in North Korea, it is called Liberation of Fatherland Day.
Taiwan, which was also colonized by Japan, did not develop a historical understanding of the date as marking the end of the war until the 1990s, when former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was mayor of Taipei. Prior to that, the event was seen through the blurry Chinese lens of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), which conflated it with China’s War of Resistance Against Japan. In the KMT’s and the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) China, Sept. 3 marks the day of victory over Japan. In Taiwan, it is called Armed Forces Day.
Calling it “armistice day” would be in line with Japan’s view, but it is also a neutral term as far as Taiwan is concerned. If Taiwan has its own subjective identity, if it is a country, then it should follow the example of Seoul and Pyongyang. Following the Japanese or Chinese definition— whether it be the definition of KMT/Nationalist China or CCP/Communist China — just shows how confused Taiwan is about its history.
The time between Aug. 15 and Oct. 25, 1945 was a period of confusion during which Taiwan descended from liberation into subjugation. Taiwan, which lacked its own national identity, was enveloped in the confusion surrounding the motherland. Korea, which was colonized by Japan from 1910 and 1945, had left and right-wing movements.
Former South Korea president Syngman Rhee and North Korean founder Kim Il-sung asked the KMT and the CCP for help, and although Korea split into North and South, the two remain independent countries.
What about Taiwan? Among idealistic Taiwanese who felt that China was the motherland turned to either the KMT or the CCP, with the result that Taiwan was thrown into a struggle between the two parties, a struggle that remains unsettled.
Taiwanese who welcomed the motherland were liberated on Aug. 15, 1945, only to fall under someone else’s control again on Oct. 25 the same year, when the Nationalist army came to Taiwan to accept the Japanese surrender on behalf of the Allies and proceeded to occupy Taiwan.
Following the 228 Incident in 1947, the government saw an opportunity to eliminate Taiwanese intellectuals and cultural personalities to strengthen its hold on power. In 1949, the KMT was thrown out of China by the CCP, and this was followed in Taiwan by the White Terror era and one of the world’s longest periods of martial law, all to consolidate the KMT’s hold on power.
The KMT, which managed to survive thanks to its resistance to the CCP, later reacted to the move toward democracy by joining hands with China in trying to suppress Taiwan, temporarily extending its failing existence. Taiwan, still lacking a national identity, continues to search for a way forward.
Aug. 15, 1945, was a day of liberation and independence for many former colonies around the world. These new countries have had their ups and downs, but they have been trying to find a way forward as countries with their own national identity.
If Taiwan on Aug. 15, 1945, had chosen to join the ranks of newly independent states, we would not have the current Chinese problem. Although there would have been opposition between the left and the right, as an independent country, Taiwan would not be trapped between KMT and CCP China. Instead, we would probably have had our own politics, economy and culture. We must not repeat the mistakes of history, and all of us who live in Taiwan today must be aware of our past history.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Perry Svensson
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS