Days after First Commercial Bank’s automatic teller machine (ATM) heist, the bank on Friday declared a loss of NT$83.27 million (US$2.6 million) from 41 machines and on Saturday, police made public the identities of 10 suspects.
The case is unprecedented in Taiwan in terms of the type of hacking used, the number of machines compromised, the number of suspects involved and the amount stolen. However, it is not new to other nations, as several ATM heists of this type were reportedly carried out years ago in Russia, Europe and the US in what appeared to be attacks by organized crime gangs, in which ATMs were reprogrammed to dispense cash using malware.
Russian cybersecurity firm Kaspersky Lab last year issued a report saying that an international organized crime ring had stolen up to US$1 billion from more than 100 banks in 30 nations since at least the end of 2013. In May, criminals used fake credit cards to make off with ¥1.4 billion (US$13.36 million) from more than 1,400 convenience store ATMs in Japan.
Some might say that local banks are now more aware of potential security threats as their services become digitized, while others might say it is better to have such incidents happen sooner rather than later. However, it cannot be denied that the hacking of First Commercial Bank’s ATMs exposes the vulnerability of the nation’s banking systems to cyberattacks, and highlights the government’s belated awareness of information security.
It also raises the question whether banks are adequately informed about such malicious activities and have taken preventive measures.
As for First Commercial Bank, it has long boasted of its more than 100-year history, which has seen it through the varying stages of the nation’s economic development, and it is averse to conceding that its systems could be so easily penetrated. However, this incident shows the bureaucratic indolence of the state-run bank and its careless management regarding security. It remains a mystery why First Commercial Bank was the only institution targeted among the many banks that use the same Wincor Nixdorf ATM model, barring any assistance from rogue employees.
Nonetheless, the thieves’ success in withdrawing cash without using ATM cards or tampering with the machines on July 9 and July 10 was impressive. Security experts believe First Commercial Bank’s replacement of 34 ATMs earlier this month and a relatively high density of ATMs in Taiwan was a factor, especially because the machines are often well-stocked.
Most importantly, in a worrying sign for the rest of the nation’s banks, First Commercial’s computer system was not able to detect any irregularities because the thieves had found a loophole in the security monitoring platform: They withdrew money, but left no transaction records. They forced the ATMs to dispense money without draining personal bank accounts, which might have set off alarm bells more quickly.
Both regulators and bankers are now looking into other potential instances of such fraud and have vowed to address any concerns over financial security raised by the heist. The Executive Yuan plans to launch a special task force on information and communication security on Aug. 1, despite a lack of information security personnel, actual training and professional equipment in response to increasing cyberattacks.
What really matters is turning words into action, otherwise consumers’ confidence in the nation’s banking network could falter if cyberattacks continue. After all, consumer trust is a critical component of the financial industry and security plays an important role in the development of this trust.
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Taipei is facing a severe rat infestation, and the city government is reportedly considering large-scale use of rodenticides as its primary control measure. However, this move could trigger an ecological disaster, including mass deaths of birds of prey. In the past, black kites, relatives of eagles, took more than three decades to return to the skies above the Taipei Basin. Taiwan’s black kite population was nearly wiped out by the combined effects of habitat destruction, pesticides and rodenticides. By 1992, fewer than 200 black kites remained on the island. Fortunately, thanks to more than 30 years of collective effort to preserve their remaining
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members