After Jan. 16, when Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) won a stunning election victory, pundits and officials in Washington and some elsewhere expressed apprehension that Tsai would adopt the policies of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) — the only other DPP president.
That would transform the Taiwan Strait back into the world’s No. 1 flashpoint (place where a conflict is likely to break out with participants, meaning the US and China, using weapons of mass destruction). Some even predict a war, not just a conflict.
However, Tsai is not a Chen clone or Chen with a different name. The two are very different people.
Chen was from a poor family. He was schooled in local politics. His education was in Taiwan. He did not speak a foreign language. He was a populist. He was a magnetic speaker and that was his tool to win votes.
Chen won election to the presidency in 2000 by default. It is probably more accurate to say the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) split and lost the election than to argue that Chen won. In any case, the DPP did not win a majority in the legislature and the KMT could, and did, stymie Chen and block his agenda.
Chen’s option was to rally his base — the Fukien Taiwanese who constitute 65 percent of the population. Chen alienated the other three ethnic groups, the Hakka, Mainlanders and Aborigines, by regarding them almost as enemies (They had voted for the KMT).
He thought this was the only way he could govern, but employing a divide-and-conquer strategy and exploiting ethnic ill will had its dark side.
He also calculated that by provoking China and labeling it an enemy he could nurture local nationalism and a Taiwan identity and keep supporters on his side. However, this made the Taiwan Strait a danger zone and upset the US, which was at war with terrorism, and turned Washington against Chen.
Finally, Chen reckoned that the KMT would mend its disunity and he could rule and win re-election only if he had more money (and the KMT was a rich party). He also believed the dictum promoted by some US politicians that the richest candidate wins 90 percent of the time. So he resorted to corrupt practices in the extreme.
When Chen left office he was convicted of various offenses, with friends, relatives and foreign nations, including the US, providing evidence against him. He besmirched his own name and that of his party and Taiwan.
Tsai was born into a rich family. She is Hakka — not the same ethnic group as Chen. She prefers speaking Mandarin to Taiwanese. She earned graduate degrees from outstanding academic institutions in English-speaking nations (the US and the UK). Her government jobs were not in local politics, but rather dealing with external relations and economic issues.
She won acclaim in Taiwan’s politics and support from voters with rational policies and strategies to fix the DPP, restore respect for the party and win elections, together with hard work and persistence. She did not mesmerize crowds with her good oratory; she has admitted that her KMT opponents were better speakers and more talented in debate.
Some of her opponents accused her of corruption, but nothing has stuck. No one talks of her selling political jobs or keeping bank accounts abroad. The conclusion is that she is clean.
Tsai won election to the presidency with an unqualified victory. She attained more votes than two other candidates combined, garnering a record number of votes since Taiwan adopted a direct system for electing its presidents. She won considerable votes from Taiwan’s minority groups. She has a clear mandate to govern.
One might say she won partly because the KMT and President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) did not do a good job and became unpopular. Also populism helped her. That is true. However, Tsai arguably won more by espousing ideas that would fix Taiwan’s problems and a sound election strategy.
She also had coattails. The DPP won a resounding victory in the legislature. This will ensure her relatively smooth governing. It will help Tsai advance reforms, which was part of her agenda, and which are sorely needed.
Tsai won Taiwan’s highest office not by manufacturing an enemy and promoting local nationalism as Chen did. Her policy of maintaining the “status quo” in cross-strait relations was a central tenet of her campaign.
She likewise realized that a cordial relationship with the US, or at least Washington’s neutrality in the election campaign, was essential. She convinced top officials in the US that she did not want to provoke China or take the US for granted and would not become another Chen that the US Department of State still despises.
Tsai still faces serious challenges. One is her party base. Many prefer Taiwan’s independence to the “status quo” and think their election win justifies that. They also believe China will come around. Both ideas are dangerous.
Tsai also faces a faltering economy and a less than favorable global marketplace. She has to build good relations with Taiwan’s business leaders and China. Both are, to some degree, unfriendly.
Tsai faces formidable problems. However, she is unlikely to adopt a previous president’s modus operandi to solve them.
John Copper is the Stanley J Buckman Distinguished Professor (emeritus) of International Studies at Rhodes College in Memphis, Tennessee.
When US budget carrier Southwest Airlines last week announced a new partnership with China Airlines, Southwest’s social media were filled with comments from travelers excited by the new opportunity to visit China. Of course, China Airlines is not based in China, but in Taiwan, and the new partnership connects Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport with 30 cities across the US. At a time when China is increasing efforts on all fronts to falsely label Taiwan as “China” in all arenas, Taiwan does itself no favors by having its flagship carrier named China Airlines. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs is eager to jump at
The muting of the line “I’m from Taiwan” (我台灣來欸), sung in Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), during a performance at the closing ceremony of the World Masters Games in New Taipei City on May 31 has sparked a public outcry. The lyric from the well-known song All Eyes on Me (世界都看見) — originally written and performed by Taiwanese hip-hop group Nine One One (玖壹壹) — was muted twice, while the subtitles on the screen showed an alternate line, “we come here together” (阮作伙來欸), which was not sung. The song, performed at the ceremony by a cheerleading group, was the theme
Secretary of State Marco Rubio raised eyebrows recently when he declared the era of American unipolarity over. He described America’s unrivaled dominance of the international system as an anomaly that was created by the collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War. Now, he observed, the United States was returning to a more multipolar world where there are great powers in different parts of the planet. He pointed to China and Russia, as well as “rogue states like Iran and North Korea” as examples of countries the United States must contend with. This all begs the question:
Liberals have wasted no time in pointing to Karol Nawrocki’s lack of qualifications for his new job as president of Poland. He has never previously held political office. He won by the narrowest of margins, with 50.9 percent of the vote. However, Nawrocki possesses the one qualification that many national populists value above all other: a taste for physical strength laced with violence. Nawrocki is a former boxer who still likes to go a few rounds. He is also such an enthusiastic soccer supporter that he reportedly got the logos of his two favorite teams — Chelsea and Lechia Gdansk —
RSS