After OBI Pharma last week issued a statement apologizing for failing to register sales of shares by one of its major shareholders as required, people are wondering if other companies listed on the local bourse have also broken the law and should come under scrutiny.
OBI Pharma on Wednesday said that senior finance manager Chang Sui-fen (張穗芬) had failed to register stock trading activities by Alpha Corporate Holdings Ltd, after investigators found the British Virgin Islands-registered company sold OBI Pharma shares worth several hundred million New Taiwan dollars in October last year, which Chang allegedly concealed.
This violated the declaration procedure for publicly listed companies in Taiwan regarding their shareholding changes, and OBI Pharma is likely to face a fine of between NT$240,000 and NT$2.4 million (US$7,423 and US$74,234) under the Securities and Exchange Act (證交法).
OBI Pharma shares have gone into free-fall since Feb. 21, when the firm announced that second and third-phase clinical trial results of a new breast cancer vaccine showed “no statistical significance,” followed by insider-trading allegations involving a number of high-ranking executives and Academia Sinica President Wong Chi-huey (翁啟惠).
The firm said it would begin an internal investigation and take appropriate action in a bid to limit the fallout, but that has not been enough to stave off criticism after media outlets reported that OBI Pharma chairman Michael Chang (張念慈) was a key figure in Alpha Corporate Holdings.
Investigators are still trying to clarify if the British Virgin Islands entity is a shell company set up by Michael Chang to hide his investment profits and whether Chang Sui-fen was under pressure from her superiors to conceal the change in the company’s shareholding structure.
However, questions have also been raised about whether regulators have turned a blind eye to an increasing number of local businesses that have sought shelters from tax laws in places such as the British Virgin Islands, the Cayman Islands and other tax havens.
Samoa and Mauritius are also on the “best” tax haven-list for Taiwanese to register offshore companies. Interestingly, another of OBI’s major shareholders is a Taiwanese company registered in Samoa whose representative is Yang Shih-chien (楊世緘), a national policy adviser to President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九).
Not all Taiwanese companies registered overseas engage in illegal activities. Many Taiwanese businesses set up overseas-registered entities when the government relaxed restrictions on business investments in China, a move that was aimed at helping them contain the risk of those investments affecting their home market operations. Nowadays, many individuals and companies set up offshore entities to enjoy lower tax rates on capital gains, while a few firms use overseas registries or shell companies to hide assets from tax authorities, help launder the proceeds of criminal activities or conceal misappropriated wealth.
In the case of OBI Pharma, financial authorities and investigators need to find out if high-ranking executives or major shareholders used offshore entities to avoid taxation and financial oversight. However, what was once a single company’s problems are seemingly growing into a regulatory issue and more than just an insider-trading scandal.
If the government does not act swiftly to fix shortcomings in the taxation system and cannot move forcefully enough against the illegal use of offshore companies based in tax havens, it will invite suspicion that Taiwan is supporting income inequality, tax evasion, money laundering and other irregular activities.
Donald Trump’s return to the White House has offered Taiwan a paradoxical mix of reassurance and risk. Trump’s visceral hostility toward China could reinforce deterrence in the Taiwan Strait. Yet his disdain for alliances and penchant for transactional bargaining threaten to erode what Taiwan needs most: a reliable US commitment. Taiwan’s security depends less on US power than on US reliability, but Trump is undermining the latter. Deterrence without credibility is a hollow shield. Trump’s China policy in his second term has oscillated wildly between confrontation and conciliation. One day, he threatens Beijing with “massive” tariffs and calls China America’s “greatest geopolitical
On Sunday, 13 new urgent care centers (UCC) officially began operations across the six special municipalities. The purpose of the centers — which are open from 8am to midnight on Sundays and national holidays — is to reduce congestion in hospital emergency rooms, especially during the nine-day Lunar New Year holiday next year. It remains to be seen how effective these centers would be. For one, it is difficult for people to judge for themselves whether their condition warrants visiting a major hospital or a UCC — long-term public education and health promotions are necessary. Second, many emergency departments acknowledge
US President Donald Trump’s seemingly throwaway “Taiwan is Taiwan” statement has been appearing in headlines all over the media. Although it appears to have been made in passing, the comment nevertheless reveals something about Trump’s views and his understanding of Taiwan’s situation. In line with the Taiwan Relations Act, the US and Taiwan enjoy unofficial, but close economic, cultural and national defense ties. They lack official diplomatic relations, but maintain a partnership based on shared democratic values and strategic alignment. Excluding China, Taiwan maintains a level of diplomatic relations, official or otherwise, with many nations worldwide. It can be said that
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made the astonishing assertion during an interview with Germany’s Deutsche Welle, published on Friday last week, that Russian President Vladimir Putin is not a dictator. She also essentially absolved Putin of blame for initiating the war in Ukraine. Commentators have since listed the reasons that Cheng’s assertion was not only absurd, but bordered on dangerous. Her claim is certainly absurd to the extent that there is no need to discuss the substance of it: It would be far more useful to assess what drove her to make the point and stick so
RSS