Disappointment, frustration and anger might be the best words to describe the popular mood in Hong Kong today. The annual New Year’s Day pro-democracy march has become part of the territory’s political calendar, as thousands of conscientious citizens took to the streets, opposing authoritarian governance and demanding Beijing allow them direct democracy.
Ever since the British hand-over of Hong Kong’s sovereignty to China in July 1997, the territory has been ruled by corporate business elites whose concerns are identical to those of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leadership. Since corporate greed has taken precedence over public interest, the post-colonial administration has always favored the top 1 percent at the expense of the majority of the population.
After so many years of economic dysfunction, Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying (梁振英) and his cronies have been indifferent toward popular grievances and incapable of handling any crisis.
Meanwhile, China’s central government is still struggling to come to grips with the root causes of massive occupations of several downtown districts during the “Umbrella movement” in late 2014. The state-controlled media only looked at the Umbrella protests through the lens of Cold War politics, condemning Hong Kongers for undermining China’s policy of “one country, two systems” and subverting the socialist state.
So far, the political message from Beijing has been an ambiguous one, indicating that the position of the CCP leadership is still shifting. Much can be done to strengthen the local pro-democracy struggle and reassure Beijing of Hong Kongers’ desire for peace and stability within the Chinese nation.
The Umbrella movement in late 2014 and this year’s New Year’s Day pro-democracy march were not simply calling for the end of Leung’s administration. These protests rejected the entire system of authoritarian governance that Beijing has put in place.
Most post-Umbrella movement activists understand that democracy is neither a matter of having more directly elected lawmakers in an unrepresentative government nor that of gambling Hong Kong’s political future. They see democracy as a means of empowering the public in the decisionmaking process.
What they want is full democratization of the executive and legislative branches of government. Any failure to equip Hong Kongers with the opportunity and resources to create a highly autonomous administration would only betray China’s “one country, two systems.”
As far as Beijing is concerned, Hong Kong still has minimal symbolic significance for Taiwan. Since Taiwanese are fiercely debating the nation’s rapprochement with China before the upcoming elections on Saturday next week, any crackdown on Hong Kong protesters that is reminiscent of the 1989 Tiananmen Square Massacre would induce Taiwan to move toward independence.
However, there have been too many instances where reality falls short of the democratic ideals underpinning Hong Kong’s Basic Law.
Beijing has not taken any initiative to democratize the territory. Since Hong Kongers cannot introduce democratic change from within, they remain deeply frustrated with their unrepresentative rulers and have decided to vote with their feet by attending pro-democracy rallies every New Year’s Day. This irreconcilable tension and conflict will continue to shape the territory’s political landscape and its troublesome relationship with China this year.
Joseph Tse-Hei Lee is a professor of history and codirector of the bachelors’ degree program in global Asia studies at Pace University in New York.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS