Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Eric Chu (朱立倫) late last month outlined his defense policies during a televised policy presentation. During the first presidential candidates’ debate, he reiterated those ideas, pledging to establish an all-volunteer military, restart the streamlining of the military and promote the idea of a high-tech army.
If these are Chu’s three main suggestions for building up the nation’s military, there is reason to be concerned.
First, two of Chu’s three proposals are not feasible; namely, the all-volunteer military and restarting military streamlining. These are pledges that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration failed to deliver on because they were blocked by KMT legislators.
These suggestions were also determined to be empty pledges long ago, so it is surprising to see Chu pick them up and use them as his own.
In particular, when addressing the all-volunteer military suggestion, Chu proposed that salaries for volunteers should be raised to NT$40,000 per month as an incentive to join the military.
However, offering equal pay to all soldiers places too much focus on money and this is one of the blind spots in the push for an all-volunteer system.
The current starting salary for volunteers is NT$33,625 per month. To encourage them to stay in service longer, the government also provides two additional subsidies: one for combat troops and one for those in non-combat positions. Not only are these two subsidies a waste, they are also unfair.
The military has repeatedly suggested that to retain outstanding volunteers, the government should provide additional subsidies only to those who have highly specialized skills, professional licenses or are obtaining such licenses and certificates. This would be the best way for the military to retain talented personnel and eliminate those that are not sufficiently qualified.
However, the Ministry of National Defense has refused to implement this reform, making it difficult to keep outstanding talent.
It seems that Chu is unaware of the difficulty facing the recruitment of soldiers to an all-volunteer military, but he still wants to increase monthly salaries to NT$40,000 simply to make things look good.
Chu also said that he would restart a project to streamline the military. Ma also pushed for this project, despite it being blocked by KMT lawmakers because it failed to take the military’s combat capability into consideration, and instead tried to force a Procrustean one-size-fits-all solution.
Yet Chu is now pushing a project that would seriously hurt the military’s combat capabilities. It is difficult to understand why he is doing this.
The last of Chu’s suggestions is to build a high-tech military, but his goal of strengthening guided missile, anti-ship and electronic warfare capabilities is both risky and limited.
It is risky because Chu has overlooked air space control through strengthening the air force’s combat capabilities, and it is limited because control of the seas includes three-dimensional air, surface and underwater combat capabilities, and it cannot be restricted to anti-ship warfare only.
Besides, in this era of information warfare, why would Chu only mention strengthening electronic warfare capabilities?
Chu is running to become the nation’s commander in chief. He really must rely on professionalism and sincerity if he wants to convince the public that he is up to the task, rather than proposing defense policies that simply will not work.
Lin Hon-chan is a military journalist and doctoral student at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS