Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Eric Chu (朱立倫) late last month outlined his defense policies during a televised policy presentation. During the first presidential candidates’ debate, he reiterated those ideas, pledging to establish an all-volunteer military, restart the streamlining of the military and promote the idea of a high-tech army.
If these are Chu’s three main suggestions for building up the nation’s military, there is reason to be concerned.
First, two of Chu’s three proposals are not feasible; namely, the all-volunteer military and restarting military streamlining. These are pledges that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and his administration failed to deliver on because they were blocked by KMT legislators.
These suggestions were also determined to be empty pledges long ago, so it is surprising to see Chu pick them up and use them as his own.
In particular, when addressing the all-volunteer military suggestion, Chu proposed that salaries for volunteers should be raised to NT$40,000 per month as an incentive to join the military.
However, offering equal pay to all soldiers places too much focus on money and this is one of the blind spots in the push for an all-volunteer system.
The current starting salary for volunteers is NT$33,625 per month. To encourage them to stay in service longer, the government also provides two additional subsidies: one for combat troops and one for those in non-combat positions. Not only are these two subsidies a waste, they are also unfair.
The military has repeatedly suggested that to retain outstanding volunteers, the government should provide additional subsidies only to those who have highly specialized skills, professional licenses or are obtaining such licenses and certificates. This would be the best way for the military to retain talented personnel and eliminate those that are not sufficiently qualified.
However, the Ministry of National Defense has refused to implement this reform, making it difficult to keep outstanding talent.
It seems that Chu is unaware of the difficulty facing the recruitment of soldiers to an all-volunteer military, but he still wants to increase monthly salaries to NT$40,000 simply to make things look good.
Chu also said that he would restart a project to streamline the military. Ma also pushed for this project, despite it being blocked by KMT lawmakers because it failed to take the military’s combat capability into consideration, and instead tried to force a Procrustean one-size-fits-all solution.
Yet Chu is now pushing a project that would seriously hurt the military’s combat capabilities. It is difficult to understand why he is doing this.
The last of Chu’s suggestions is to build a high-tech military, but his goal of strengthening guided missile, anti-ship and electronic warfare capabilities is both risky and limited.
It is risky because Chu has overlooked air space control through strengthening the air force’s combat capabilities, and it is limited because control of the seas includes three-dimensional air, surface and underwater combat capabilities, and it cannot be restricted to anti-ship warfare only.
Besides, in this era of information warfare, why would Chu only mention strengthening electronic warfare capabilities?
Chu is running to become the nation’s commander in chief. He really must rely on professionalism and sincerity if he wants to convince the public that he is up to the task, rather than proposing defense policies that simply will not work.
Lin Hon-chan is a military journalist and doctoral student at National Taiwan University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS