The landmark agreement between Japan and South Korea over the so-called comfort women dispute represents a significant success for Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and indirectly for the US, which has been urging its northeast Asian allies to bury the hatchet in the face of common threats supposedly emanating from China and North Korea.
However, while Abe hailed what he called a new era in bilateral relations and his foreign minister described the deal as epoch-making, the response from South Korean President Park Geun-hye was notably cooler. Park said only that she hoped the agreement would enable the two countries “to start building trust and open a new relationship.”
After taking office in early 2013, Park repeatedly refused to meet Abe. Her reluctance was widely interpreted as a deliberate attempt to milk anti-Japan sentiment for domestic political purposes.
When the two finally met last month at a much-delayed South Korea-Japan-China summit in Seoul, Park took the extraordinary step of excluding Abe from a state banquet with Chinese leaders .
As in China, public displays of hostility to Japan play well with conservatives and nationalists. Rightwing factions in South Korea work hard to ensure Tokyo’s wartime depredations are not forgotten or forgiven.
Prejudice remains deep-seated. An opinion poll last year found Abe was more unpopular among South Koreans than even North Korea’s murderous dictator, Kim Jong-un.
Park’s animosity, genuine or calculated, has adversely affected South Korea’s alliance with the US, which still maintains a substantial, post-Korean war military presence there. Park, flirting with a new strategic partnership with Beijing, was the only leader of a major democracy to attend China’s World War II victory celebrations in September.
Abe’s domestically controversial reinterpretation of Japan’s post-war pacifist constitution to allow the deployment and possible engagement of Japanese armed forces abroad has been met with suspicion in Seoul, too. The refusal of South Korea to directly share military intelligence with Japan necessitated a convoluted arrangement last year whereby both countries sent sensitive information to Washington, which then passed it on.
Park’s grudging shift on the comfort women issue appears to have followed key concessions from Tokyo, including the creation of a Japanese government-administered compensation fund and acknowledgement of the wartime military authorities’ complicity in enslaving the women.
However, the shift is also the result of persistent, sometimes crude pressure from US President Barack Obama’s administration, impatient over perceived South Korean recalcitrance. There has been growing frustration in Washington, shared in Tokyo, that previous agreements ostensibly settling the comfort women issue have been disregarded by successive South Korean leaders who try to “move the goalposts.”
Earlier this year, US Under-Secretary of State for Political Affairs Wendy Sherman publicly scolded Seoul for provocative political opportunism, although Park was not mentioned by name.
“Of course, nationalist feelings can still be exploited, and it’s not hard for a political leader anywhere to earn cheap applause by vilifying a former enemy. But such provocations produce paralysis, not progress,” Sherman said.
South Korea’s ever more salient national security needs have also encouraged an expedient rapprochement with Japan after years of diplomatic deep-freeze.
Far from imploding after the death of Kim Jong-il in 2011, North Korea’s brutal regime has grown ever more threatening under the tutelage of Kim Jong-un, the late dictator’s unpredictable son.
In a joint statement last month, the US and South Korean defense ministers, echoing Tokyo’s stance, expressed grave concern over North Korea’s ongoing development of nuclear weapons and long-range missiles.
And despite Park’s attempts to curry favor with China, and China’s obvious interest in exploiting divisions between the two US allies, Beijing’s assertive political and military behavior across the Asian region has become increasingly difficult to ignore.
Since taking office in 2012, Abe has gone to enormous lengths to counter Chinese expansionism, energetically pursuing binding political, security and trade alliances with smaller Asian neighbors.
Earlier this month, he cut a series of cooperative deals with India, a major regional player that Japan, like the US, views as an important partner in balancing China’s ambitions.
Now, by apparently resolving the comfort women dispute, Abe has gone some way toward bringing South Korea back in line.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS