At the beginning of the year, many Taiwanese were hoping for a step toward constitutional reform. Even passage of the modest proposal to lower the voting age to 18 would have given the public a sense that they are able to realize the fundamental democratic principal of reforming the Constitution, breathing new life into the aging and outdated document.
Unfortunately, although there originally existed a strong consensus about the constitutional reform program, in an atmosphere of backstabbing and scheming between the two main political parties, talks broke down. This meant that groups that had joined forces to promote constitutional reform were forced to swallow the bitter pill of failure at the last moment.
When Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) assumed the post, he argued strongly that the legislature’s power to veto the president’s choice for premier be restored. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) objected just as strongly. At the time, neither party could have predicted that the DPP would be in the running to take more than half the seats in the legislature in January’s elections. The political situation has changed drastically since the beginning of the year.
It is evident that the cross-party constitutional reform program has become mired in short-sighted thinking and short-term political gains. It seems it is not possible for objectivity and sound moral judgement to be taken as a starting point for the creation of a new Constitution that is both fair and reasonable, while containing a balanced and reciprocal set of rights and responsibilities.
By pushing hard that separate absentee voting and lowering of voting age proposals be tied in one bill, the KMT caused discussions to break down.
At least DPP Chairperson and presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) showed sincerity at a conference on constitutional reform organized by civic groups by signing a pledge to reform the Constitution.
Although the reform program fell at the final hurdle, at least there is a sense that if Tsai is elected president, she would feel duty-bound to quickly convene a national conference on constitutional reform.
The conference should be a gathering of all those who care about constitutional reform to thoroughly examine the inadequacies and omissions of the Constitution. Then, if the DPP can achieve three-quarters of the vote in the legislature, the blueprint for constitutional reform — jointly drafted by the public and politicians — would become a reality. This would truly be the start of a new form of localist politics.
Constitutional reform appears to be an issue that is difficult to resolve. However, after last year’s Sunflower movement, civic consciousness has gained a foothold. Add to this the wide-ranging debate on constitutional reform that is being carried out across the nation at all levels of society and it is clear that a number of consensuses have already been reached. All that is required is to take into account the weight of public opinion and everything else would fall into place.
The public anticipates a changing of the guard with the Jan. 16 presidential and legislative elections, which are set to alter the balance of power in the legislature. The significance of such an event would be more than just the alternation of political power. It would provide the nation with an opportunity to relaunch the process of constitutional reform, make progress in political and social development, and build a foundation for long-term political stability.
Ku Chung-hwa is the convener of the preparatory committee for the National Alliance of Constitutional Reform.
Translated by Edward Jones
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS