As the US struggles to address extreme income inequality and inadequate social mobility, the nation’s most venerated colleges are increasingly examining their piece of that puzzle: How can they better identify and enroll gifted, promising students from low-income families, lessening the degree to which campuses perpetuate privilege and making them better engines of advancement?
That discussion just took an interesting turn.
About three weeks ago, a group of more than 80 colleges — including all eight in the Ivy League and many other highly selective private and public ones — announced that they are developing a free Web site and set of online tools that would, among other things, inform ninth and 10th-graders without savvy college advisers about the kind of high-school preparation that best positions them for admission.
Illustration: Mountain People
In addition, these colleges plan to use the Web site for an application process, in place by next fall, that would be separate from, and competitive with, the Common App, a single form students can submit to any of more than 600 schools. If colleges in the new group — which calls itself the Coalition for Access, Affordability and Success — have been taking the Common App, they would continue to, but would clearly be encouraging students to explore this alternate route.
If you know anything about the frenzied, freaked-out world of college admissions these days, you can imagine how much commotion this development generated among obsessed parents, overburdened guidance counselors and others caught up in the whorl. It was something to behold.
It also revealed curious logic at the pinnacles of higher education.
Unlike many of this new coalition’s harshest critics, I trust that the schools involved really do want to diversify their student bodies, which do not reflect US society.
However, in common with those critics, I wonder how the new application process is set to accomplish this and whether it would be more effective to adopt less complicated, confusing strategies.
First, some context, along with details about what the coalition is proposing:
As it stands now, the US’ most selective colleges are dominated by students from affluent backgrounds. As my New York Times colleague David Leonhardt wrote in a recent article: “For every student from the entire bottom half of the nation’s income distribution at Dartmouth, Penn, Princeton, Yale and more than a few other colleges, there appear to be roughly two students from just the top 5 percent,” which means they come from families making at least US$200,000.
From 2013 to last year, the most recent time period for which figures were available, 38 percent of undergraduates nationally received federal Pell grants, reserved for students from low-income families.
In the Ivy League, the percentage ranged from 12 (Yale) to 21 (Columbia), according to the US’ National Center for Education Statistics. While 31 percent of students at the University of California, Berkeley, received Pell grants, just 13 percent at the University of Virginia did.
Such low percentages largely reflect the flawed education and support systems that too many underprivileged kids in the US encounter. These children do not have the academic grounding, transcripts and test scores that their wealthier counterparts do, frequently because they have not attended schools of commensurate quality.
From preschool through 12th grade, we have failed them. We can hardly expect higher education to rush in belatedly and save the day.
At the same time, there is evidence that talented children from low-income families who could handle the work at leading colleges and get ample financial aid often do not realize it. In addition, there are aspects of those colleges’ admissions processes that work against them.
Members of the new coalition said that they are trying to change that and to “unlock some of the mystery of what it means to apply to any institution,” in the words of Zina Evans, the vice president for enrollment management and associate provost at the University of Florida, whom I spoke with last week.
I spoke as well with admissions officials at Yale and at Smith College, which, like Florida, belong to the coalition.
They said that the new online tools are meant to be a one-stop shop for information about financial aid, application requirements and more. Students could also use this online platform to interact with top schools, sending inquiries and receiving answers.
The platform would include a so-called “locker” for creative work — essays, videos and drawings — that students would be encouraged to begin filling in the ninth grade, as a reminder that college is on the horizon.
They could share those lockers with mentors and come application time, they could upload its contents for admissions officers.
The platform would additionally serve as an application portal to colleges in the coalition, which would be able to customize their individual demands more easily than they do with any supplements to the Common App that they currently require.
If you are asking how this makes applying to college easier for poor kids, you are right to, and you are in a mind meld with many confused and skeptical college counselors and higher-education experts.
They predicted that privileged kids with hovering parents would interpret the coalition’s suggestion about beginning to fill a locker in the ninth grade as yet another reason to turn the entire high-school experience into a calculated, pragmatic audition for college admissions officers.
Meanwhile, underprivileged kids, lacking the necessary guidance and awareness, might never take advantage of the platform.
“We have to make sure we give them the resources,” said Emmanuel Moses, the senior manager of college guidance at the Opportunity Network, which nurtures underprivileged kids to and through college.
In other words, a set of online tools to be used with mentors would not do much good if there are not any mentors to use them with.
Coalition members conceded that they had not fully figured out that part, but said they were determined to.
“That’s the core challenge,” Smith College vice president for enrollment Audrey Smith said.
The coalition’s composition also contradicts its message of unimpeded, universal access. Partly because the coalition is limited to schools with six-year graduation rates of at least 70 percent, it is a league mostly of exclusive schools that seem to be distinguishing themselves from the pack. That has led some critics to question its stated motives.
“A group of America’s most high-profile private colleges, already obsessed with prestige, are attempting to grab more,” wrote Jon Boeckenstedt, the associate vice president of enrollment management and marketing at DePaul University in Chicago, in the Washington Post.
DePaul does not belong to the coalition.
He added that they were “making hollow promises to low-income kids they could already serve if they really wanted to.”
When I spoke with him last week, when he went even further.
“I think the Common App has become much too common for some of these people,” he said, referring to coalition members. “I think it completely offends their vanity.”
Whatever the case, there is much about their admissions criteria that runs counter to the enrollment of underprivileged children, and it is unclear whether the new online platform and application process would really fix that.
High scores on the SAT or American College Testing (ACT) tests correlate with high family income, in part because performance on these tests can be improved with the special classes and private tutoring that money buys. That was one reason cited by Hampshire College when it announced last year that it would stop collecting applicants’ scores and would go unranked by US News & World Report, which factors in those numbers.
A transcript brimming with advanced placement classes is a testament to the applicant, yes — but also to the resources of the high school that offered a broad menu of such classes. In addition, students from certain backgrounds and school districts are more likely than those from others to have hands-on help rounding up the perfect letters of recommendation, orchestrating an attention-getting extracurricular dossier and even writing impressive essays.
With regard to essays, “there’s a lot of work being done on personal statements that’s decreasing their value in the admissions process,” Yale dean of undergraduate admissions Jeremiah Quinlan said.
If the locker and other features of the new platform wind up giving disadvantaged kids additional, non-traditional ways to show their mettle, it might turn out to be a step in the right direction. However, the schools in the coalition need a more detailed plan than they have articulated for making sure that those kids know about the platform and how it can benefit them.
Any rethinking of the “status quo” of admissions is terrific. The same goes for any spotlight on the dearth of diversity at many exclusive schools. I just hope the members of the coalition accomplish more, in the end, than merely illuminating education’s inequities.
Recently, the Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) published three of my articles on the US presidential election, which is to be held on Nov. 5. I would like to share my perspective on the intense and stalemated presidential election with the people of Taiwan, as well as Taiwanese and Chinese Americans in the US. The current consensus of both major US political parties is to counter China and protect Taiwan. However, I do not trust former US president Donald Trump. He has questioned the US’ commitment to defending Taiwan and explicitly stated the significant challenges involved in doing so. “Trump believes
The government is considering building a semiconductor cluster in Europe, specifically in the Czech Republic, to support Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC) new fab in Dresden, Germany, and to help local companies explore new business opportunities there. Europe wants to ensure the security of its semiconductor sector, but a lack of comprehensive supply chains there could pose significant risks to semiconductor clusters. The Czech government is aggressively seeking to build its own semiconductor industry and showing strong interest in collaborating with Taiwanese companies. Executive Yuan Secretary-General Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) on Friday said that Taiwan is optimistic about building a semiconductor cluster in
China has successfully held its Forum on China-Africa Cooperation, with 53 of 55 countries from the African Union (AU) participating. The two countries that did not participate were Eswatini and the Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, which have no diplomatic relations with China. Twenty-four leaders were reported to have participated. Despite African countries complaining about summit fatigue, with recent summits held with Russia, Italy, South Korea, the US and Indonesia, as well as Japan next month, they still turned up in large numbers in Beijing. China’s ability to attract most of the African leaders to a summit demonstrates that it is still being
The Russian city of Vladivostok lies approximately 45km from the Sino-Russian border on the Sea of Japan. The area was not always Russian territory: It was once the site of a Chinese settlement. The settlement would later be known as Yongmingcheng (永明城), the “city of eternal light,” during the Yuan Dynasty. That light was extinguished in 1858 when a large area of land was ceded by the Qing Dynasty to the Russian Empire with the signing of the Treaty of Aigun. The People’s Republic of China founded by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has never ruled Taiwan. Taiwan was governed by the
RSS