Sometimes the best way to stop a bad machine is with a lot of good machines.
Several companies are applying the techniques of artificial intelligence (AI) to the world of security and they are using a whole bunch of machines strung together in so-called cloud computing networks to do it. Originally the province of university researchers, and now one of the ways Google and other companies figure out what is going on across the Web, AI technology is being employed by security companies, who say they can beat criminals by using many of the same strategies.
Much as Google examines Web sites for significant information and watches the behavior of people searching and surfing the Web, AI security companies look for malicious sites or try to examine and predict the behavior of malware, which is software meant to cause problems.
Illustration: Yusha
“We are looking at about 200,000 samples of malicious code a day, so we can guard maybe 11 million events in a microsecond,” said Tomer Weingarten, the chief executive of a computer security company called SentinelOne.
Staying on top of that volume requires the equivalent of 10,000 computers, Weingarten said.
As computing becomes more pervasive, traditional defenses are proving inadequate. For example, the firewall, which was once an effective safeguard on the perimeter between a corporate network and the world, is now problematic: It has become harder to say where systems begin and end as they become connected to more and more things. In 2013, Target was hacked when criminals entered the main servers through software for a company heating system that was managed by a contractor.
More recently, “sandboxes” have been developed that temporarily isolate incoming programs and files to see if they try something malicious. In response, hackers have written code enabling malware to recognize that it is being quarantined — sometimes by contacting a computer’s operating system directly — so it does not take any suspicious action until it detects that it has been released.
Every day, SentinelOne’s computers scour the many listings worldwide of known malware and attack codes, which are publicly posted by government agencies and private security organizations. Using machine learning, an AI technique of pattern mapping, the computers then look for similarities with known techniques and try to identify similar behaviors that precede attacks.
That information is then loaded into computing “agents” that are inside its clients’ computers. The agents observe events inside a computer almost the moment they occur. If, for instance, a so-called “ransomware” program starts to encrypt a user’s files — to lock up the computer, which will be freed only once the owner pays a ransom — the agent will isolate the program and notify the system administrator.
Often, it can also undo whatever damage was caused by reverting the few files that were affected to an earlier state.
“Sometimes it is easy to see malicious behavior — no legitimate application would just start encrypting everything,” Weingarten said. “Other times, they are ‘spraying the heap,’ looking for all the commands being queued up in the computer so they can rewrite the system and insert their code. Normal applications do not do these things.”
Every piece of malware also has its own biography within the system. Weingarten recently called up a program called Troldesh, which was first observed on the evening of April 9. It created files on the infected computer, then changed the files and notified a server in Russia that it was ready.
“This starts to look suspicious,” Weingarten said.
Signals can be bounced around, so it is hard to say just where Troldesh originated. It also communicated with machines in Hungary, Austria and Germany.
Troldesh was identified and stopped, but a hacker could reuse much of the code in other malware. That is why AI tries to learn hackers’ rules and habits.
Another challenge in protecting today’s computer networks is how poorly understood much of the world’s software is.
“There are 600 million individual files known to be good and a malware universe of about 400 million files, but there are also 100 million pieces of potentially unwanted adware and 200 million software packages that just are not known. It takes a lot of talent to figure out what is normal and what is not,” Gartner analyst Lawrence Pingree said.
The process, which he called “endpoint detection,” looks at and acts on what goes on in individual machines.
Many of the same techniques can also be used on other kinds of bad online behavior. Carlos Guestrin, a well-regarded expert in machine learning, is chief executive and cofounder of a company called Dato. In addition to traditional AI businesses, such as figuring out shopping preferences, he started looking at fraudulent behaviors.
“We caught spam with machine learning by looking at sequences of words. Now, we look for the code in a virus, like DNA, that makes it do unusual things,” Guestrin said. “With human fraud, you look for relationships about who sends money to who, or who is hiding fraudulent transactions. If a finite number of people keep sending each other money, they are probably trying to look like legitimate businesses.”
G2 Web Services, based in Bellevue, Washington, helps banks figure out if a Web site is fraudulent or is selling contraband. Using Guestrin’s product, coupled with human experience, on hundreds of millions of sites, G2 improved its ability to predict fraud and crime by 13 percent. Over millions of transactions, that amounts to quite a lot.
G2 can also flag prohibited content, like child pornography, which exists on about 1.5 percent of all merchant Web sites. Sometimes a criminal would put a link to a store for illegal growth hormones in an otherwise honest site, without the merchants ever knowing about the link placement. Another use for AI is spotting “transaction laundering,” in which an illegal business tries to appear legitimate by processing transactions through a legal site.
The company is making strides against cybercrime, as “the guys who run these illicit sites are also into viruses and malware,” G2 principal data scientist Alan Krumholz said. “It is a cat-and-mouse game. They go from one business into another.”
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS