Chu replaces ‘Chu’
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman and New Taipei Mayor Eric Chu (朱立倫) has replaced Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) — who is often called “Chu” — as the KMT presidential candidate.
Hung was formally nominated and then inhumanely removed from the candidacy.
Foreigners might be confused by the two Chu’s names, while Taiwanese cannot tell the difference between their political ideologies.
Hung’s candidacy fell apart mainly because she pushed the “one China, same interpretation” framework.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) agreed with Hung, saying her stance echoed the so-called “1992 consensus” of “one China, different interpretations.”
The interpretation has been made solely by China, with no room for an interpretation by the Republic of China (ROC).
Chu, on the other hand, advocated “two shores belonging to one China” when he met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Chu’s advocacy and Hung’s stance are indistinguishable, as in “a half pound, or eight ounces.”
However, in his presidential nomination acceptance speech in Taipei, he mentioned the ROC and Taiwan loud and clear — when he was asking for votes.
Chu said that democracy in Taiwan would be in jeopardy if the KMT fails. The way he replaced Hung shows he is far from a gentleman. This also reconfirms that the KMT has never been a democratic party.
A popular saying now is: “Taiwan will not be good unless the KMT falls,” which rhymes both in Taiwanese and Chinese.
Chu had promised to complete his term as New Taipei City mayor and said he would not run for president. He pretends to be shy, but he is a greedy man, and he is happy that he was drafted. He is regarded as “Ma 2.0.”
Taiwanese cannot afford to have another Ma-type politician like Chu.
Charles Hong
Columbus, Ohio
The obsession with money
What a shame. During Double Ten National Day celebrations, in front of the whole world, President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) apparently forgot that he was the president of the Republic of China and acted as if he were on the campaign trail, addressing supporters at a rally.
What stupidity. More stupid than Ma are Taiwanese who voted for him; not once, but twice.
However, Taiwanese are not stupid. The only reason they voted for Ma is that their love for money is more powerful than any other motivation, including their love for Taiwan.
Pierre Loisel
New Taipei City
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS