The government and the opposition seem to have reached an agreement on entering the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), but for fear of losing support in rural areas, they have avoided announcing the premise for starting the negotiations — allowing the import of US pork treated with ractopamine.
The problem is that the import of treated pork would impact the pork industry and food safety in the nation much more severely than the deregulated import of US beef.
Also, since entry into the TPP would slash NT$2 billion (US$53 million) from the nation’s agricultural production and product processing, and cut about 10,000 jobs in the industry, the government should proceed with caution, while bearing in mind that the EU and China refuse to import US pork containing ractopamine residues.
In the past, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) criticized President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration for cutting secret deals with the US over the deregulation of beef imports. Taiwanese are now wondering if a similar thing would happen if DPP presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) wins the Jan. 16 election and if her party — in the event of securing a legislative majority — would follow in the footsteps of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), passing such legislation without letting the Cabinet address public health concerns, listen to public opinion and prepare appropriate measures.
Before deciding on who to vote for, people should consider how to make the legislature reflect public opinion and act as a counterweight to the government by representing the public in controlling entry into the TPP, the cross-strait agreements on trade in goods and services, and other free-trade agreements.
The number of pig farmers and pigs have been falling due to rising feed prices; piglet deaths from swine fever, the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome and porcine diarrhea; changing domestic consumption patterns; shrinking litter sizes; and other industry-related issues.
The number of pig farmers has dropped from a peak of more than 10,000 to about 8,000 and the number of pigs has dropped from more than 10 million to about 5 million. The main reason for this is small-scale family operations that constitute the bulk of the industry not having the resources to invest in a capital-intensive, high-tech pig farming model.
About 70 percent of pig farmers rely on traditional farming methods, and the resulting high pork prices and low production volume makes it difficult for them to compete with imported pork. Also, only a minority can obtain agricultural product traceability.
Because domestic epidemics have not been eliminated, it is difficult to export Taiwanese pork, which means that the pork industry is a domestic demand market and every year, the nation imports between 30,000 and 40,000 tonnes of pork from the US and the Netherlands. The limited domestic consumption means that if import volumes are further relaxed as a result of entry into the TPP, it would place severe restrictions on domestic pig farming.
Until the overall standards for pig farming have been elevated, and a classification and auctioning system for pork has been established, rushing through lower customs tariffs and allowing the import of US pork containing ractopamine residue would have a massive impact on the domestic industry, and this is an issue that the government must not take lightly.
Joining the TPP would both pose a threat and provide an opportunity for pig farmers. If the government can use accession into the TPP as a pretext to restructure and reform pig farming, it would be possible to turn the industry around.
Possible reforms might include: helping pig farmers with low operational efficiency and high levels of diseased livestock to leave the industry while promoting modern pig farming technologies; establishing a transparent market mechanism; improving meat quality inspections; establishing a pork classification and auction system; encouraging domestic production of corn feed and vaccines; and working toward eradicating swine diseases in the nation’s pig farms.
Time is not on Taiwan’s side — government officials cannot keep delaying reforms and wait for change to happen on its own, nor can Taiwanese wait for the next government to take over.
Du Yu is chief executive officer of the Chen-Li Task Force for Agricultural Reform.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS