The government and the opposition seem to have reached an agreement on entering the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), but for fear of losing support in rural areas, they have avoided announcing the premise for starting the negotiations — allowing the import of US pork treated with ractopamine.
The problem is that the import of treated pork would impact the pork industry and food safety in the nation much more severely than the deregulated import of US beef.
Also, since entry into the TPP would slash NT$2 billion (US$53 million) from the nation’s agricultural production and product processing, and cut about 10,000 jobs in the industry, the government should proceed with caution, while bearing in mind that the EU and China refuse to import US pork containing ractopamine residues.
In the past, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) criticized President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration for cutting secret deals with the US over the deregulation of beef imports. Taiwanese are now wondering if a similar thing would happen if DPP presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) wins the Jan. 16 election and if her party — in the event of securing a legislative majority — would follow in the footsteps of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), passing such legislation without letting the Cabinet address public health concerns, listen to public opinion and prepare appropriate measures.
Before deciding on who to vote for, people should consider how to make the legislature reflect public opinion and act as a counterweight to the government by representing the public in controlling entry into the TPP, the cross-strait agreements on trade in goods and services, and other free-trade agreements.
The number of pig farmers and pigs have been falling due to rising feed prices; piglet deaths from swine fever, the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome and porcine diarrhea; changing domestic consumption patterns; shrinking litter sizes; and other industry-related issues.
The number of pig farmers has dropped from a peak of more than 10,000 to about 8,000 and the number of pigs has dropped from more than 10 million to about 5 million. The main reason for this is small-scale family operations that constitute the bulk of the industry not having the resources to invest in a capital-intensive, high-tech pig farming model.
About 70 percent of pig farmers rely on traditional farming methods, and the resulting high pork prices and low production volume makes it difficult for them to compete with imported pork. Also, only a minority can obtain agricultural product traceability.
Because domestic epidemics have not been eliminated, it is difficult to export Taiwanese pork, which means that the pork industry is a domestic demand market and every year, the nation imports between 30,000 and 40,000 tonnes of pork from the US and the Netherlands. The limited domestic consumption means that if import volumes are further relaxed as a result of entry into the TPP, it would place severe restrictions on domestic pig farming.
Until the overall standards for pig farming have been elevated, and a classification and auctioning system for pork has been established, rushing through lower customs tariffs and allowing the import of US pork containing ractopamine residue would have a massive impact on the domestic industry, and this is an issue that the government must not take lightly.
Joining the TPP would both pose a threat and provide an opportunity for pig farmers. If the government can use accession into the TPP as a pretext to restructure and reform pig farming, it would be possible to turn the industry around.
Possible reforms might include: helping pig farmers with low operational efficiency and high levels of diseased livestock to leave the industry while promoting modern pig farming technologies; establishing a transparent market mechanism; improving meat quality inspections; establishing a pork classification and auction system; encouraging domestic production of corn feed and vaccines; and working toward eradicating swine diseases in the nation’s pig farms.
Time is not on Taiwan’s side — government officials cannot keep delaying reforms and wait for change to happen on its own, nor can Taiwanese wait for the next government to take over.
Du Yu is chief executive officer of the Chen-Li Task Force for Agricultural Reform.
Translated by Perry Svensson
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS