In the nine-in-one elections last year, civic groups protested the Central Election Commission’s (CEC) decision to ban members of the public from taking photographs and making video recordings in the audience area at ballot-box tallying stations during vote counting.
On Wednesday, Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Chi-mai (陳其邁), during a question-and-answer session at the Legislative Yuan, asked CEC Chairman Liu Yi-chou (劉義周) whether the commission planned to reconsider the ban.
Liu said the commission planned to meet this month to discuss a resolution passed by the legislature’s Internal Administration Committee, which requests that the CEC revoke the ban, and added that he would lobby in favor of the resolution.
The commission’s reluctance to take action is not surprising. Although civic groups have repeatedly urged the agency to reform a variety of election-related regulations before every election, the issues have remained unresolved.
Examples of such matters include the calls to lower the voting age from 20 to 18 and the discussions over whether to implement absentee voting.
Such issues end up being treated by political parties as bargaining chips for constitutional amendments; and as a result, nothing gets done to genuinely address them.
The ballot-counting process must be open and transparent. This is the guiding principle that election agencies in all nations must follow.
For example, in Mongolia, to address the strong suspicions over the transparency of the ballot-counting process, the government in 2012 began broadcasting the entire process to people waiting outside voting stations. The number of disputes caused by the process has been greatly reduced ever since.
The commission fears that allowing people to videotape the ballot-counting process inside voting stations might violate electoral neutrality.
It has also come up with several other excuses, such as allowing members of the public to take photographs and record videos would put too much pressure on election officials, or the practice being prohibitively expensive.
It is understood that given the ubiquity of digital technology — most people have cameras on their mobile phones — it is virtually impossible to stop people from taking pictures or making video recordings of the ballot-counting process.
This shows that Chen was right when he said at the Legislative Yuan that, “the [CEC] should not remain in the Stone Age, it must make politics more open and more transparent.”
Chen Chien-fu is convener of Citizen’s Congress Watch’s interactive video-on-demand team.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS