In Scotland, people are brought up to think of police officers as allies and to ask one for help when someone needs it. Imagine the surprise of a 19-year-old on his first visit to the US, when he was met by a stream of obscenities from a New York City police officer who was directing traffic in Times Square after the youth asked him for directions to the nearest post office. In the subsequent confusion, the boy inserted his employer’s urgent documents into a trash bin that, to him, looked a lot like a mailbox.
Europeans tend to feel more positively about their governments than do Americans, for whom the failures and unpopularity of their federal, state and local politicians are a commonplace. Yet Americans’ various governments collect taxes and, in return, provide services without which they could not easily live their lives.
Americans, like many citizens of rich nations, take for granted the legal and regulatory system, the public schools, health care and social security for the elderly, roads, defense and diplomacy and heavy investments by the state in research, particularly in medicine.
Illustration: Mountain People
Certainly, not all of these services are as good as they might be, nor held in equal regard by everyone; but people mostly pay their taxes and if the way that money is spent offends some, a lively public debate ensues and regular elections allow people to change priorities.
All of this is so obvious that it hardly needs saying — at least for those who live in rich nations with effective governments, but most of the world’s population does not.
In most of Africa and Asia, states lack the capacity to raise taxes or deliver services. The contract between government and governed — imperfect in rich nations — is often altogether absent in poor nations. The New York police officer was little more than impolite (and busy providing a service); in most of the world, police prey on the people they are supposed to protect, shaking them down for money or persecuting them on behalf of powerful patrons.
Even in a middle-income nation like India, public schools and public clinics face mass, and unpunished, absenteeism. Private doctors give people what they think they want — injections, intravenous drips and antibiotics — but the state does not regulate them and many practitioners are entirely unqualified.
Throughout the developing world, children die because they are born in the wrong place — not of exotic, incurable diseases, but of the commonplace childhood illnesses that rich nations have known how to treat for almost a century. Without a state that is capable of delivering routine maternal and child health care, the children will continue to die.
Likewise, without government capacity, regulation and enforcement do not work properly, so businesses find it difficult to operate. Without properly functioning civil courts, there is no guarantee that innovative entrepreneurs can claim the rewards of their ideas.
The absence of proper state capacity — that is, of the services and protections that people in rich nations take for granted — is one of the major causes of poverty and deprivation around the world. Without effective states working with active and involved citizens, there is little chance for the growth that is needed to abolish global poverty.
Unfortunately, the world’s rich nations currently are making things worse. Foreign aid — transfers from rich nations to poor nations — has much to its credit, particularly in terms of healthcare, with many people alive today who would otherwise be dead, but foreign aid also undermines the development of local state capacity.
This is most obvious in countries — mostly in Africa — where the government receives aid directly and aid flows are large relative to fiscal expenditure, often more than half the total. Such governments need no contract with their citizens, no parliament and no tax-collection system.
If they are accountable to anyone, it is to the donors; but even this fails in practice, because the donors, under pressure from their own citizens — who rightly want to help the poor — need to disburse money just as much as poor-nation governments need to receive it, if not more so.
What about bypassing governments and giving aid directly to the poor? Certainly, the immediate effects are likely to be better, especially in nations where little government-to-government aid actually reaches the poor. And it would take an astonishingly small sum of money — about US$0.15 per day from each adult in the rich world — to bring everyone up to at least the destitution line of a US dollar a day.
Yet this is no solution. Poor people need government to lead better lives; taking government out of the loop might improve things in the short run, but it would leave unsolved the underlying problem. Poor nations cannot forever have their health services run from abroad. Aid undermines what poor people need most: an effective government that works with them for today and tomorrow.
One thing that people in developed nations can do is to agitate for their own governments to stop doing those things that make it harder for poor nations to stop being poor. Reducing aid is one, but so is limiting the arms trade, improving rich-nation trade and subsidy policies, providing technical advice that is not tied to aid and developing better drugs for diseases that do not affect rich people.
People cannot help the poor by making their already-weak governments even weaker.
Angus Deaton, a professor of economics and international affairs at Princeton University’s Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs, is this year’s Nobel laureate in economics.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS