Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) is representing the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in January’s presidential election. However, it is shocking that, having served as a lawmaker for a quarter-century, the fundamental principles of democracy still seem to sound Greek to her.
Hung posted an article late on Friday night lamenting the loss of trust in Taiwanese society, adding that she is especially worried about the public’s distrust of the media, president, officials, lawmakers and judges. Citing the example of the late Li Kwoh-ting (李國鼎), who had served in various Cabinet positions from 1965 to 1988 — mostly during the Martial Law period — Hung said that the distrust between ordinary people and politicians today is the exact opposite of the situation during Li’s time.
Well, if Hung knows the fundamental ideas of democracy — as she should, having served as a lawmaker in a democracy for 25 years, ascending to the position of deputy speaker — she should understand that, in a democracy, it is believed that power brings corruption, and absolute power brings absolute corruption. Therefore it is nothing to be shocked about that the public do not trust the government, and, in fact, it would be worrisome if the public put too much trust in politicians in a democracy.
Actually, it is not just between the public and the government; the idea behind having different branches in a government, instead of putting all the power in one office, is to have them check and balance each other to prevent expansion and abuse of power.
Former Miaoli County commissioner Liu Cheng-hung (劉政鴻), for instance, was a very trusted politician in the county. He enjoyed a high approval rating and was re-elected in 2009 with a record-breaking 63.7 percent of the votes. Whenever he was criticized for controversial policies, Miaoli County residents would not hesitate to come to his defense.
When Liu left office at the end of last year, he left Miaoli with one of the most serious debts in the nation, with several corruption allegations involving himself or his family.
Liu’s story may just be an example of what would happen if the public trust the government too much.
Let us go back to Li.
It is not that surprising that Li — as well as government officials of his time — enjoyed higher support rates among the public, since during the Marital Law era from 1949 to 1987, the media were under strict censorship, and most newspapers, radio stations and TV stations were more or less under government influence in one way or another.
If government officials today can commit wrongdoings in spite of so much media coverage, if Li had been involved in any corruption or abuse of power, the public would have known nothing of it.
Earlier, Hung sparked controversy during a meeting with business leaders by saying that if the legislature could not be reformed, then she would shut it down, after a businessman complained about inefficiency in the legislature.
It is really hard to imagine that the deputy speaker of the legislature in a democracy would say something like that — perhaps political leaders in an authoritarian regime would not dare to openly say so either.
Various remarks Hung made after she announced her candidacy are shocking and reveal her lack of true understanding of democracy. It is sad to see that such a person is running for president, representing a political party that created the “Republic of China.”
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing