Sickly sweet beverages
Thank you for the article you published containing what should be to everyone who read it a huge “red flag” concerning the health dangers of consuming sugary beverages (“HPA says sugary drinks can lead to health issues,” Aug. 20, page 5).
The obesity epidemic in the US and explosion in the number of people with diabetic and pre-diabetic health issues have largely been linked to soda and other sugary drinks. From the statistics you mention in the article based on the Ministry of Health and Welfare’s study conducted last year, Taiwan is heading down the same path, especially given the younger generation’s seemingly insatiable appetite for such health-destroying beverages.
The article accurately points out that sugary drinks do not quench one’s thirst. In fact, they make a person even thirstier, compelling them to drink even more and thus compounding the problem. However, in addition to being thirstier, fructose (the main type of sugar found in soda and most sugary drinks, especially in the form of high fructose corn syrup) adversely affects the way the brain recognizes and responds to a person’s consumption behavior.
More specifically, fructose causes the brain to inhibit the activity of leptin (sometimes called the “satiety hormone”), a hormone that is essential for regulating the body’s appetite, metabolism, etc. In short, consuming high amounts of the fructose found in sugary drinks prevents your body from telling you that you are full, even though you are taking in a high number of calories. Thus, sugary beverages and added sugars in general are highly addictive, as the vicious cycle of sugar consumption continues.
The article focuses primarily on the amount of sugar and calories in these drinks and also mentions the amount of exercise it takes to “burn off” those extra calories. Unfortunately, most people mistakenly believe that they can undo the negative effects of these sugary drinks simply by burning enough calories and that they can keep enjoying their high-sugar and high-calorie drinks as long as they work at burning it off afterward.
Perhaps an even greater danger than what soda and sugary drinks do to one’s waistline is what they do to a person’s blood composition and the way they wreak havoc on the body’s processes of normal functioning.
When sugar is absorbed into the bloodstream, the pancreas produces large amounts of insulin in order to process all of it. Too much sugar consumption can eventually overwhelm the pancreas to such a degree that it cannot cope with processing all of the sugar and cannot keep up with producing the proper amount of insulin the body needs while weakening the insulin that is produced, hence, the high risk of developing diabetes.
High sugar intake is also closely linked to the development of cancer, as it has been well established in medical and scientific studies that cancer cells feed off sugar and therefore thrive and rapidly multiply when there are high amounts of processed and refined sugar in the body.
Without a doubt, one of the best things a person can do health-wise is to give up all sugary drinks. Those who regularly consume an abundance of soda and sugary drinks are not only trashing their health, but are throwing away their hard-earned money in the process. The article suggests replacing sugary beverages with water, which is good, but often a very difficult change to make for those who dislike the tastelessness of plain water. One idea is to add a slice or two of lemon to a glass of water, which gives it a light, pleasant taste while providing the benefits of lemon’s anti-cancer and detoxifying properties and without any added calories.
Wayne Schams
Pingtung
History repeating itself
The situation in China and Russia is familiar. If China’s economy falls into recession, then China is the new Japan. During the late 1980s and early 1990s, after Japan became the second-largest economy in the world, many thought that Japan would become the most powerful country in the world. Instead, it went into a recession. The same might be happening in China today.
As for Russia, Russia is occupying part of Ukraine. However, during former US president George W. Bush’s time in office, Russia occupied part of Georgia and still does today. And during 50 years of the Cold War, Soviet Russia controlled many more of its neighbors.
Andres Chang
Taipei
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS