Ever since President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) took office, he has always made a point of talking about how much he has achieved, and how he has put all his efforts into creating a sense of well-being among Taiwanese. Unfortunately, if this sense of well-being really exists, it does so only in a parallel universe.
The first to throw cold water over these dreams was the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS). Early this year, Ma said that the nation’s economic growth rates would be the highest among the four Asian Tigers (Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore and South Korea). However, not only is the growth rate unlikely to reach 2 percent this year, it is likely to be the lowest it has been since 2010 and the lowest among the four nations.
For the past seven years, the Ma administration has proven itself to be helpless in the face of a whole range of falling indicators, with little idea of how to turn things around. All it does is come up with empty slogans such as “all-out for the economy.” Does anyone recall the “Economic Power-up Plan”? There are many more where that came from. Unfortunately, any substantial plan or national vision from the government is conspicuous only by its absence. The plethora of slogans and sound bites means little more than a dearth of strategy. The fewer ideas it has, the more it relies on slogans; the more it talks of substance, the more fantastical it all is.
Even the Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement the Ma administration is so proud of has only borne the bitter fruit of closer ties with China that have exposed Taiwan’s economy to high degrees of risk. Taiwan has yet to receive any benefits from this agreement, but has certainly had its fill of drawbacks. With huge capital flows to China, there has been a crowding out effect for corporate investment in Taiwan, leading to a hemorrhaging of jobs. In addition, exports have been concentrated in a single region: If China experiences economic difficulties, or structural changes occur within the manufacturing industry there, Taiwan’s trade structure would be put at extreme risk.
This can be seen from DGBAS statistics as well as how a decreasing GDP is due to China’s declining economic growth rate and the emergence of the red supply chain, making China increasingly independent of Taiwanese suppliers.
Despite a weakening economy, the Ma administration continues to accumulate government debt. In the almost eight years he has been in office, Ma has seen the legal debt limit rise to NT$1.84 trillion (US$55.96 billion). The economy is in trouble, the government is allowing state finances to go further and further into the red, ordinary people are finding it harder and harder to get by, salaries are falling in real terms and workers in the 30-to-39-year-old bracket are earning less now than they were 18 years ago.
An economic growth rate below that of other Asian nations, the burgeoning wealth disparity and low salaries for younger generations — all of these issues should serve as a wake-up call for the government, because they all involve national competitiveness and social stability. Still, the Ma administration has no clue what to do and just tries to hide behind massaged statistics.
It is interesting that the National Development Conference report on the public’s perception of their current quality of life shows that people are satisfied with their lives, especially when compared with the harsh realities. The trouble is, people have no way of knowing whether the figures were just cooked up by the Ma administration, or if Taiwanese really are enjoying their lives.
Chang Ching-yun is an assistant research fellow at the Taiwan Brain Trust.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its