There is no better metaphor for the economic challenge facing China than a futuristic architectural masterpiece designed to house the nation’s state television network, China Central Television (CCTV). A few months before the landmark building was to be completed in 2009, officials at the network conducted an unauthorized fireworks display, sparking a fire that consumed a smaller building in the complex, a wedge-shaped tower that Beijing’s residents had nicknamed the Termite’s Nest.
The fire delayed the completion of the CCTV headquarters until 2012. The Termites’ Nest remains unfinished and unoccupied; its structural integrity was destroyed in the fire and it cannot be torn down for fear of undermining its bigger neighbor. The good part of the structure cannot shake off the burden of the bad.
The two buildings recall China’s increasingly two-tracked economy: A new track based on services and consumption burdened by an old, slower track made up of industries like steel and mining, which are inefficient and suffer from excess capacity. Straddling both tracks is the nation’s real-estate market, which is characterized by massive overcapacity in medium and small-sized cities, and robust demand in large cities.
The problem is compounded by the Chinese government’s insistence on sticking with high growth targets — 7 percent at present — and the resulting reliance on credit to produce the requisite output. As the credit system has been designed around implicit state guarantees, much of the financing is misallocated to the economy’s less efficient, highly indebted sectors. As a result, the foundations of China’s growth miracle are steadily being eroded by a debt overhang that shows few signs of receding.
The government’s loss of control over the economy has become increasingly evident. The meteoric rise and subsequent crash in the nation’s stock market has left investors badly rattled. However, the real wake-up call has been the belated effort to sort out local government borrowing and misspending.
China’s National Audit Office’s first attempt to estimate the size of local government debt uncovered a stock worth 26 percent of GDP at the end of 2010. A second effort in mid-2013 revealed a further rise to 32 percent of GDP, while the latest study by the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences shows that the debt jumped sharply to 47.5 percent of GDP by the end of last year.
In November, 2013, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) laid out a reform agenda that sought to increase the role of the market in China’s economy. This, it was hoped, would solve the capital misallocation problem that seemed to be leading to an unsustainable rise in debt.
Local government debt became a major test case. Early this year, the central government announced plans to convert the local governments’ short-term, high-interest bank loans into long-term bonds. By increasing the maturity of the debt, the central government hoped to alleviate financing constraints on local governments and allow them to pursue financial stimulus.
When China’s banks balked at accepting the low yields offered on the new bonds, the goal of increasing the market’s role in the economy went out the window. The government forced banks to execute the debt swap. Unsurprisingly, banks suddenly became risk-averse. Local governments discovered that even with an improved liquidity position, banks were reluctant to extend new loans.
Meanwhile, a slump in the real-estate market deprived local governments of their main revenue source: land sales. Thus ensued one of the more shocking developments in modern Chinese economic policymaking: the government’s call for stimulus was simply ignored.
China appears to be falling into a trap that it assiduously sought to avoid. The nation’s debt problem looks set to worsen as the government neglects its reforms in favor of short-term growth objectives. The drag on the economy is likely to increase as resources continue to be diverted toward keeping inefficient firms alive. Banks are likely to become ever more risk-averse as they seek to hide bad debts and avoid write-downs.
The government has sought to increase liquidity by dropping controls on the movement of capital. Doing so not only further undermines its control of the economy, it also creates the risk of a full-blown financial crisis that could engulf its neighbors and other emerging markets. For the moment, with the rising US dollar adding to China’s economic woes, as its currency appreciates sharply against regional peers, the authorities have fallen back on old instincts by devaluing the currency.
That is unlikely to be enough. China’s property market is deflating. Its equity markets have been discredited and its economy seems increasingly sluggish. As a result, the nation’s vast pool of domestic savings is increasingly looking to move abroad. Relative to the size of China’s foreign debt and the sheer volume of money that could go abroad, even its US$3.7 trillion in foreign reserves starts to look puny.
Like termites, debt has a unique capacity to make short work of an economy’s foundations. By the time the infestation is recognized, it is often too late. If China is to reverse the damage, it needs to focus on debt deleveraging, repair its capital allocation mechanism and delay the abolition of capital controls.
The nation’s economy is likely to suffer a growth crisis within the next 12 to 24 months. Its severity is likely to be determined by whether the government makes difficult adjustments now or — like Japan in the 1990s — tries to wish the termites away.
Gene Frieda is a global strategist for Moore Europe Capital Management.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS