The plunge in the local stock market on Friday, with the TAIEX falling below its 10-year moving average of 7,800 points, indicates three troubling messages.
First, investors have turned bearish on Taiwan despite the government’s renewed pledge of new economic stimuli. Second, the more than 20 percent decline in the market over the past four months represents a vote of no confidence in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government. Third, the continued losses from stock investments by the pension fund for retired public servants — military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers — and the labor insurance and pension funds pose a direct threat to everyone’s retirement plans, regardless of whether they have equities.
This is a crisis. A crisis for market sentiment, and a crisis of the public’s confidence in Taiwan.
The bad news, such as it is, is that there is slim chance of getting out of this dismal situation soon, given the current global and domestic economic uncertainties.
Some have said that Taiwanese should put aside the critical and polarized rhetoric of the past several years and focus, for as long as possible, on what matters: improving the investment environment in a way that helps prepare the nation’s children for the future.
Indeed, the government on Thursday unveiled its latest stimulus measures to shore up the export-reliant economy after the nation’s GDP weakened significantly last quarter. However, investors’ rush to dump shares the very next day indicated that they expect no good news in the short term from the government’s new initiatives, which focus mainly on structural reforms in the economy and will take time to create results.
Meanwhile, the Executive Yuan last week announced a 13.1 percent increase to next year’s government budget for public spending on infrastructure to NT$359.6 billion (US$10.9 billion), and the daily limit on Chinese individual visitors next month is to be expanded to 5,000 from the current 4,000 per day, as the government expects to rely more on domestic demand to help drive economic growth, in contrast with an export slowdown.
However, the impact of expansionary fiscal policy is not likely to take effect immediately either, because the government budget is only to be implemented from the beginning of next year. Furthermore, it is questionable whether a tourism policy that aims only to increase the volume of tourists to Taiwan, rather than drawing travelers with stronger spending power, can really benefit the domestic services sector.
It is little wonder that investors have largely deserted Taiwan, because the KMT government’s policies are nothing but recycled ideas. Some investors have complained about the higher tax burden, an issue the government is moving to address, while others have already reallocated their investment portfolios to higher-yielding assets abroad.
The latest central bank tallies showed that Taiwan registered a net outflow in its financial account for the 20th consecutive quarter in the second quarter, with a deficit of US$15.3 billion. Apparently, a lack of investment tools at home helped drive funds abroad, but this has raised particular concern of a further exodus of funds at a time when the domestic economy has been slowing down.
There is a saying that the stock market serves as a window into a nation’s economy. Taiwan’s stock market performance has been the weakest among all Asian countries this year, leaving many wondering whether this means the state of the nation’s economy will be the worst in the region this year. If the domestic property market also slows down and becomes dormant and there is no substantial pickup in global growth this year to offer some support to Taiwan’s export and manufacturing sectors, it might be time for everyone to prepare for tougher days ahead.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS