The plunge in the local stock market on Friday, with the TAIEX falling below its 10-year moving average of 7,800 points, indicates three troubling messages.
First, investors have turned bearish on Taiwan despite the government’s renewed pledge of new economic stimuli. Second, the more than 20 percent decline in the market over the past four months represents a vote of no confidence in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) government. Third, the continued losses from stock investments by the pension fund for retired public servants — military personnel, civil servants and public school teachers — and the labor insurance and pension funds pose a direct threat to everyone’s retirement plans, regardless of whether they have equities.
This is a crisis. A crisis for market sentiment, and a crisis of the public’s confidence in Taiwan.
The bad news, such as it is, is that there is slim chance of getting out of this dismal situation soon, given the current global and domestic economic uncertainties.
Some have said that Taiwanese should put aside the critical and polarized rhetoric of the past several years and focus, for as long as possible, on what matters: improving the investment environment in a way that helps prepare the nation’s children for the future.
Indeed, the government on Thursday unveiled its latest stimulus measures to shore up the export-reliant economy after the nation’s GDP weakened significantly last quarter. However, investors’ rush to dump shares the very next day indicated that they expect no good news in the short term from the government’s new initiatives, which focus mainly on structural reforms in the economy and will take time to create results.
Meanwhile, the Executive Yuan last week announced a 13.1 percent increase to next year’s government budget for public spending on infrastructure to NT$359.6 billion (US$10.9 billion), and the daily limit on Chinese individual visitors next month is to be expanded to 5,000 from the current 4,000 per day, as the government expects to rely more on domestic demand to help drive economic growth, in contrast with an export slowdown.
However, the impact of expansionary fiscal policy is not likely to take effect immediately either, because the government budget is only to be implemented from the beginning of next year. Furthermore, it is questionable whether a tourism policy that aims only to increase the volume of tourists to Taiwan, rather than drawing travelers with stronger spending power, can really benefit the domestic services sector.
It is little wonder that investors have largely deserted Taiwan, because the KMT government’s policies are nothing but recycled ideas. Some investors have complained about the higher tax burden, an issue the government is moving to address, while others have already reallocated their investment portfolios to higher-yielding assets abroad.
The latest central bank tallies showed that Taiwan registered a net outflow in its financial account for the 20th consecutive quarter in the second quarter, with a deficit of US$15.3 billion. Apparently, a lack of investment tools at home helped drive funds abroad, but this has raised particular concern of a further exodus of funds at a time when the domestic economy has been slowing down.
There is a saying that the stock market serves as a window into a nation’s economy. Taiwan’s stock market performance has been the weakest among all Asian countries this year, leaving many wondering whether this means the state of the nation’s economy will be the worst in the region this year. If the domestic property market also slows down and becomes dormant and there is no substantial pickup in global growth this year to offer some support to Taiwan’s export and manufacturing sectors, it might be time for everyone to prepare for tougher days ahead.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS