Blink, and before you know it, three years have flown past. At least that is how it can seem sometimes.
The pension issue that caused a ruckus back in 2012 has still not been resolved. What was it that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said back then? “If we don’t embark upon reform of the pension system today, we will regret it tomorrow.”
The executive branch was asked to set up a pension reform task force, which did in fact put forward some proposals, but those proposals are currently off dozing in some dark corner of the legislature, while the task force has long been disbanded. Apparently, if the issue is ignored, it will just go away.
Earlier this year, Greece’s sovereign debt crisis issue heated up. In June, the Miaoli County Government said that its finances were in such a parlous state that it could no longer afford to pay its employees’ salaries. This brought the issue of national debt into sharp focus, with many people suddenly talking about Miaoli, and even Taiwan as a whole, going the way of Greece.
However, just as suddenly, the whole thing has been overshadowed by next year’s presidential election campaign. For example, on Aug. 3, when reports surfaced that the pension fund for military personnel was expected to run out in 2018, the media only covered the story for two days. Is it really the case that the issue of pension reform can just be put aside and left for the next occupant of the Presidential Office to sort out?
Pensions and national debt are inextricably intertwined. If the further accumulation of national debt is to be curtailed, the issue of pensions must be addressed first. The public knows the basic principle behind the solution here: Raise premiums, reduce payments and extend the retirement age.
However, neither retired state employees or workers actually want to see their benefits reduced. Then there are the political considerations, as political parties and politicians will surely be mindful that to suggest such changes would be tantamount to electoral suicide. Pension reform has become a political hot potato, and yet it is central to how the problem of hidden national debt is solved.
Pensions can basically be divided into two main categories: The retirement fund for state employees, which includes an annual pension bonus and state insurance, and the retirement fund for workers, which includes labor insurance and a labor pension fund.
The problem of pensions is attributable to several factors. First, the rate of return is too high, which means the nation is essentially borrowing from the next generation. Second, people are retiring too early. Third, the replacement rate of income is too high; far higher than the national coffers can afford to pay. Fourth, the low birth rate means that in the future, the few will be supporting the many. Finally, there is the difference between pensions for state employees and workers.
Nobody is saying that these problems are easily addressed. It requires various government departments and institutions, including elected representatives on both the local and national level of government, and representatives from industry, business and academia, to put their heads together and develop new legislation that everyone finds acceptable.
What is happening in Greece is fair warning. A government debt crisis could easily hit Taiwan in a matter of years. The young people of this nation already have it tough. How can the older generations stand back and allow things to get even worse for them? The government should get its act together and solve the pension issue with the utmost urgency.
Chou Huan-jung is a member of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS