There is something so wonderfully easy about reading this column in a physical newspaper. You turned the page and here it is, with few annoyances or distractions, in an ultra-high-definition typeface that was custom-designed with pleasurable reading in mind. Or — wait — are you reading this on a phone? Did you follow a link from Twitter, or Facebook? Or maybe you are on a train, or a plane, or you are trying to use your laptop on your cousin’s crappy Wi-Fi connection out in the countryside somewhere. In which case, there is a pretty good chance that even getting this far is some kind of minor miracle.
Web-based articles, these days, are increasingly an exercise in pain and frustration. In many ways, the experience of reading such things is worse today than it was in the early days of dial-up Internet. Because at least back then Web pages were designed with dial-up users in mind. They were mostly text, and even if they used images, the text always loaded first. Today, by contrast, everything is built for a world where everybody has a high-bandwidth supercomputer in their pocket. That is not because we all do have high-bandwidth supercomputers in our pockets, although the Web technologists who are building these sites generally do, and have a tendency to forget about everybody else. Rather, it is a function of misaligned incentives.
When it comes to the economics of online publishing, the first thing to remember is that job No. 1 is not to get the news to you. Rather, it is to monetize you, by selling you off, in real time, to the highest bidder. This happens every time you click on a link, before the page has even started to load on your phone. Once upon a time, if you and I both visited the same Web page at the same time using the same Web browser, we would end up seeing the same thing. Today, though, an almost unthinkably enormous ecosystem of scripts and cookies and auctions and often astonishingly personal information is used to show you a set of brand messages and sales pitches that are tailored almost uniquely to you.
That ecosystem raises important questions about privacy and just general creepiness — the way that the minute you look at a pair of shoes online, for instance, they then start following you around every other Web site you visit for weeks. Whether or not you value your privacy, you are damaged, daily, by the sheer weight of all that technology.
Apple blogger John Gruber started off a new debate about these issues recently when he noted that a 537-word text post on the Web site iMore.com weighed in at 14 megabytes. (Fourteen megabytes of text should correspond to about 7 million words, or about 10 times the combined length of the Old and New Testaments.)
Gruber blamed iMore.com, but really it is not the Web site’s fault, since to a very large degree the owner of the Web site you are visiting does not actually control what you see, when you see it, how you see it, or even whether you see it. Instead, there are dozens of links in the advertising-technology chain and every single one of them is optimizing for financial value, rather than low-bandwidth user experience. Many pages, if you are on a slow connection, simply time out; they never load at all.
This is the tragedy of the commons. It is your bandwidth and you are paying for it, but everybody else is clogging it up with stuff you never asked for or wanted. The result is a hugely degraded user experience — bordering on the completely unusable, in many situations. Is there anybody who can fix this problem? Well, there is one potential white knight out there: Apple. The new iPhone operating system, out this summer, will allow easy, simple content blocking . This move is being sold as a response to privacy concerns, but it is sure to improve performance as well — at least on iPhones, and at least for people who have installed the right plugins.
More broadly, though, ads’ thirst for bandwidth seems destined to increase relentlessly, whether or not bandwidth itself increases quickly enough to meet that need. Already many Web publishers have started to force their viewers to sit through a video ad not just before they watch video content, but even before they read a text story.
Online ads have never got less annoying over time and you can be sure that mobile ads are going to get more annoying as well, once Silicon Valley has worked out how to better identify who you are. The move to greater privacy protections might help slow the pace with which such technologies are adopted, but there is no realistic hope that Web sites will actually improve from here. If you want to avoid the dreadful experience of the mobile Web, you will only have one choice — which is to start reading your articles natively, in the Facebook or Apple News app.
However, it will not be Facebook and Apple who killed the news brands. It will be ad tech.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS