US ‘all talk’ on Taiwan
The US has stated its interest in cross-strait relations. However, I would submit that the policies of the current US administration have not contributed to stability in the Taiwan Strait in that they weakened Taiwan’s defensive capabilities. To put it bluntly, the US has been “all talk and no do.”
Whereas the Pentagon has a genuine concern for Taiwan, I doubt that concern is replicated by US President Barack Obama’s administration, which seems to favor an appeasement approach where China and Taiwan are concerned, possibly indicating a belief on Obama’s part that Taiwan is expendable. Thankfully, it is a view not held by all members of his party or by any Republicans.
All this raises questions about future regional relations. The US is likely to act in what it perceives as its own best interests.
One would hope that Taiwan, Japan, South Korea, Vietnam and the Philippines could submerge their relatively minor differences and cooperate on a meaningful defense strategy for the region. Such an alliance would be a formidable deterrent to Communist Chinese expansionism. It would also be helpful if these nations admitted the obvious; that the fictional “one China” policy is a hindrance to cooperation and should be discarded.
Gavan Duffy
Australia
Hung’s words are inaccurate
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) said the KMT “led its people to victory in the eight-year war of resistance against Japan.”
Defeating Japan was a joint effort of the KMT, former Chinese leader Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) communists and the Allies. Japan left China after they surrendered, which was after the US dropped its nuclear bombs. One could argue it was actually the US that defeated Japan and drove it out of China. In fact, US General Joseph Stilwell, known as “Vinegar Joe,” who read and spoke Mandarin fluently and commanded Chinese troops, said of former president Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石): “China’s problem is that its leader is an illiterate superstitious peasant.”
Hung said the KMT “raised Taiwan from the wretched colony it was.”
It was wrong for Japan to occupy Taiwan. It was right for Japan to leave Taiwan. However, while here, Japan built railroads and electrified the island. Taiwan was not a wretched colony. The KMT was another foreign occupier who imposed the White Terror era on Taiwan. The difference between the KMT and Japan is that Japan left and the KMT has become a part of Taiwan.
Hung said the KMT “headed the Taiwanese economic miracle, helped the nation win worldwide respect through its democracy and consolidated cross-strait peace.”
Taiwan’s democracy and economic miracle are a result of the work of opposition activists and their supporters that the KMT imprisoned during the White Terror era. The KMT eventually enacted policies that improved Taiwan’s economy and brought free democratic multiparty elections because they saw the writing on the wall. They knew that the people of Taiwan would eventually rise up against the KMT.
Hung said “the biggest threats are egregious political infighting and populism, which have stalled Taiwan’s development, incited disorder, disrupted society and left people baffled.”
Populism is democracy. Disorder, disruption and chaos are all inherent in a democratic society; they are inherent to freedom. Taking away people’s rights in order to prevent disorder and disruption is what the People’s Republic of China has touted since the KMT left China. Hung sounds like a Chinese communist.
Andres Chang
Taipei
Why is Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) not a “happy camper” these days regarding Taiwan? Taiwanese have not become more “CCP friendly” in response to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) use of spies and graft by the United Front Work Department, intimidation conducted by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) and the Armed Police/Coast Guard, and endless subversive political warfare measures, including cyber-attacks, economic coercion, and diplomatic isolation. The percentage of Taiwanese that prefer the status quo or prefer moving towards independence continues to rise — 76 percent as of December last year. According to National Chengchi University (NCCU) polling, the Taiwanese
It would be absurd to claim to see a silver lining behind every US President Donald Trump cloud. Those clouds are too many, too dark and too dangerous. All the same, viewed from a domestic political perspective, there is a clear emerging UK upside to Trump’s efforts at crashing the post-Cold War order. It might even get a boost from Thursday’s Washington visit by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. In July last year, when Starmer became prime minister, the Labour Party was rigidly on the defensive about Europe. Brexit was seen as an electorally unstable issue for a party whose priority
US President Donald Trump is systematically dismantling the network of multilateral institutions, organizations and agreements that have helped prevent a third world war for more than 70 years. Yet many governments are twisting themselves into knots trying to downplay his actions, insisting that things are not as they seem and that even if they are, confronting the menace in the White House simply is not an option. Disagreement must be carefully disguised to avoid provoking his wrath. For the British political establishment, the convenient excuse is the need to preserve the UK’s “special relationship” with the US. Following their White House
US President Donald Trump’s return to the White House has brought renewed scrutiny to the Taiwan-US semiconductor relationship with his claim that Taiwan “stole” the US chip business and threats of 100 percent tariffs on foreign-made processors. For Taiwanese and industry leaders, understanding those developments in their full context is crucial while maintaining a clear vision of Taiwan’s role in the global technology ecosystem. The assertion that Taiwan “stole” the US’ semiconductor industry fundamentally misunderstands the evolution of global technology manufacturing. Over the past four decades, Taiwan’s semiconductor industry, led by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), has grown through legitimate means