The Miaoli County Government’s budget is not very large, so it is surprising that the county is NT$64.8 billion (US$2.1 billion) in debt and unable to pay its civil servants.
The long-term deterioration of the local fiscal situation is a result of systemic factors. One factor is the central government’s centralization of funds. Another factor is the lack of fiscal discipline, and the inability to increase revenue and reduce expenditure.
Before the Taiwan Province administration was frozen in 1998, the provincial Department of Finance conducted strict reviews of local government budget plans, and adopted an evaluation system after budget implementation. Unfortunately, the system was not completely transferred to the Ministry of Finance. Considering Miaoli’s financial difficulties, the ministry should improve monitoring and control of local government finances to prevent the situation from deteriorating further.
As for non-systemic factors, fiscal deterioration often occurs when a mayor or commissioner has a fondness for the grandiose. According to US economist William Niskanen, bureaucrats seek to increase their budgets by using their power for personal gain. Local government heads, top officials and county councilors are all politicians, and they seek to increase budgets and staff for their own units. Although they know the local government is in debt, they raise debt to maximize their financial clout. As human weakness is like a runaway horse, local government debt surges.
Before a bailout, the ministry should demand that the Miaoli County Government propose a feasible plan to increase revenue and reduce expenditure, and that local civil servants work together at this difficult time and are treated as accomplices in the bankruptcy. The Miaoli County commissioner, top county officials and county councilors should be prepared for salary cuts. Are they aware that New York City officials cut their salaries in the 1970s to resolve a fiscal crisis?
Even if officials only have their monthly salaries cut by NT$5,000, that would signal their determination to stop increasing their power by expanding the budget, thus warning related units not to make slack budgets. This could also fix financial loopholes and lower opposition if Miaoli wants to broaden the sources of revenue by increasing taxes and fees.
The central government has provided a legal basis for local governments to broaden their revenue sources, although local government heads seldom employ them in order to attract votes. This is proven by the fact that local government finances have not improved since the Act Governing Local Tax Regulations (地方稅法通則) was implemented in 2002. The Miaoli County Government should have used the act to boost revenue and clear debt. The easiest way is to levy surtaxes on the central government’s income tax or the county government’s land value and house taxes.
Miaoli can refer to my 2001 book, Let’s Go to Taoyuan, in relation to the county’s fiscal reform. Taoyuan’s financial shortage stood at NT$16.5 billion in 1999, and in the budgets for the second half of 1999 and all of 2000, during my term as Department of Finance director, we cleared part of the old debt without taking on new debt.
Fiscal reform is a long and painful task. It is long because communication of concepts is time-consuming, and it is painful because it inevitably offends vested interests of an unreasonable existing system, causing conflict. However, if the Miaoli County Government can show unselfish concern for its civil servants and for residents’ welfare, and move forward courageously, it will succeed.
Tsai Chi-yuan is a former director of Taoyuan’s Department of Finance.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS