In times of calamity
In wake of the avoidable tragedy at the Formosa Fun Coast (八仙海岸) water park in New Taipei City’s Bali District (八里), I noticed something remarkable: young people, injured themselves, carrying those who were in worse pain. This captures perfectly why I have come to love Taiwan over my eight years here.
Of course, the news focuses on the suffering and whom to blame, but as a nation, Taiwan should honor the hundreds of heroes that terrible night, young adults who gathered for a night of celebration, but found themselves in an avoidable, calamitous and deadly event.
Beside first-responders who reacted to the best of their abilities, ordinary young people acted bravely, carrying victims on rubber floats or driving complete strangers to hospitals.
This generation has been called “apathetic” and “lazy,” but I am always reminded of why one should never underestimate the strength of young Taiwanese.
Many of them are likely to not only have physical scars, but emotional scars. I hope that Taiwanese embrace them as they transition to a new chapter in their lives, and that the nation does not abandon them. My heart and thoughts go out to victims and families, but also to the hundreds of heroes who responded so selflessly on that terrible evening.
Arturo Meneses
Hsinchu
Incentives for births needed
An aging population is a problem faced by a number of nations. It is said that by having fewer children, parents are bequeathing a massive debt to future generations, as fewer people are working, meaning less taxes are paid that are required to sustain services.
While policies that encourage older workers to remain on the job have merit, a far better strategy would be to encourage people to have at least two children, preferably three. The statistical replacement level is 2.3 children per couple, factoring in stillbirths, cot deaths and death in early childhood.
Tax incentives of various kinds and child endowment are some of the ways this can be achieved. These measures soon pay for themselves in increased demand for food, clothing, education and other goods and services, creating jobs.
Another possibility is granting citizenship to certain immigrant workers who demonstrate loyalty to the nation.
Given Taiwan’s position vis-a-vis China, I would think a declining population would be most undesirable.
Gavan Duffy
Runcorn, Australia
Contrasting US loyalties
Two articles — one by Han Cheung and the other by Nicholas Shaxson (“In remembrance of a ‘needless sacrifice,’” June 24, page 12, and “Follow the money: inside the world’s tax havens,” June 24, page 9) — provided a sharp contrast on Americans’ loyalties to the US during different times.
The former article aroused a sense of pride in being American and focused on the honor of sacrifice for the nation during World War II. However, the second article highlighted how giant US firms have dodged tax payments by setting up offices in offshore tax havens in recent years. The trend in the second article coincides with news about the increasing number of Americans renouncing their US citizenship to avoid paying taxes last year and early this year.
It seems that Americans were willing to sacrifice their lives for their nation during wartime, but are happy to compromise their loyalty for financial gain during peacetime.
Hopefully, this is only a quirky feeling that struck me as we near Independence Day.
Chingning Wang
Pingtung
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS