In 2001, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) — then a member of the party’s Central Standing Committee — was the unofficial standard-bearer for a process described as turning the KMT into another version of the deep-blue New Party. She proposed that former KMT president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) be punished for betraying the party and called for his membership to be revoked.
Who would have thought that almost 15 years later and after the KMT’s drubbing in last year’s nine-in-one elections, Hung again would be the torchbearer for the same process?
The KMT’s deep-blue faction appears to have ingested a large quantity of mind-altering substances and is under Hung’s spell. The similarity between these two phases of the same process is the eradication of “localist elements” within the KMT to forge a new, deep-blue party, bent on rapid unification with China.
After last year’s Sunflower movement and elections, the KMT’s deep-blue faction was in low spirits, but Hung’s proposal of “one China, same interpretation” and her call for a cross-strait peace deal have given the camp a glimmer of hope. Hung now seems to be unstoppable in the race to become the KMT’s presidential candidate.
However, there is a problem with the “one China, same interpretation” proposal: Unless China is explicitly defined as the People’s Republic of China, Beijing will assume the Taiwanese side is advocating de jure independence. Aiming to brush off accusations of rapid unification, Hung says her proposal would make China “accept that the Republic of China exists.” This is clearly a “two China” policy, a position that Beijing could never accept.
The Sunflower movement dealt a bitter blow to Chinese leadership. Beijing adjusted its Taiwan policy, choosing more subtle methods, rather than attempt to directly challenge mainstream Taiwanese public opinion. Beijing also no longer views the KMT as Taiwan’s sole spokesperson. Beijing is aware that Hung’s “one China, same interpretation” would push the KMT toward the rapid unification end of the political spectrum and result in catastrophic failure for the party in next year’s presidential and legislative elections.
The best method for dealing with the cross-strait issue is a policy of “creative ambiguity,” refraining from stirring the hornets’ nest of independence versus unification, so leaders on both sides of the Taiwan Strait do not feel forced to put their cards on the table. The US takes the same view.
Everyone wishes to prioritize the economy and no one wants to deal with “military liberation.” Therefore, Hung’s impetuous rapid-unification policy is simply throwing a bone to her rabid pack of deep-blue supporters.
The KMT’s days are numbered. The party’s biggest error was in allowing President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to continually trample over public opinion, annihilate localist KMT members and pursue a fast-paced move toward unification with China.
Hung is just Ma’s shadow. If the party endorses her as presidential candidate, next year’s elections might be curtain time for the KMT.
If, on the other hand, People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) pairs with Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) for the pan-blue camp, Tsai could face a difficult battle, the outcome of which nobody could predict. Wang would launch his localist power base and join forces with the PFP under Soong. Voters would face a difficult choice: Soong and Tsai have mainstream support.
When the KMT disintegrates, its localist faction might find a new home in the PFP. Perhaps Soong could even change the name of his party to the KMT.
Allen Houng is a professor at National Yang-Ming University’s Institute of Philosophy of Mind and Cognition.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS