In 2001, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) — then a member of the party’s Central Standing Committee — was the unofficial standard-bearer for a process described as turning the KMT into another version of the deep-blue New Party. She proposed that former KMT president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) be punished for betraying the party and called for his membership to be revoked.
Who would have thought that almost 15 years later and after the KMT’s drubbing in last year’s nine-in-one elections, Hung again would be the torchbearer for the same process?
The KMT’s deep-blue faction appears to have ingested a large quantity of mind-altering substances and is under Hung’s spell. The similarity between these two phases of the same process is the eradication of “localist elements” within the KMT to forge a new, deep-blue party, bent on rapid unification with China.
After last year’s Sunflower movement and elections, the KMT’s deep-blue faction was in low spirits, but Hung’s proposal of “one China, same interpretation” and her call for a cross-strait peace deal have given the camp a glimmer of hope. Hung now seems to be unstoppable in the race to become the KMT’s presidential candidate.
However, there is a problem with the “one China, same interpretation” proposal: Unless China is explicitly defined as the People’s Republic of China, Beijing will assume the Taiwanese side is advocating de jure independence. Aiming to brush off accusations of rapid unification, Hung says her proposal would make China “accept that the Republic of China exists.” This is clearly a “two China” policy, a position that Beijing could never accept.
The Sunflower movement dealt a bitter blow to Chinese leadership. Beijing adjusted its Taiwan policy, choosing more subtle methods, rather than attempt to directly challenge mainstream Taiwanese public opinion. Beijing also no longer views the KMT as Taiwan’s sole spokesperson. Beijing is aware that Hung’s “one China, same interpretation” would push the KMT toward the rapid unification end of the political spectrum and result in catastrophic failure for the party in next year’s presidential and legislative elections.
The best method for dealing with the cross-strait issue is a policy of “creative ambiguity,” refraining from stirring the hornets’ nest of independence versus unification, so leaders on both sides of the Taiwan Strait do not feel forced to put their cards on the table. The US takes the same view.
Everyone wishes to prioritize the economy and no one wants to deal with “military liberation.” Therefore, Hung’s impetuous rapid-unification policy is simply throwing a bone to her rabid pack of deep-blue supporters.
The KMT’s days are numbered. The party’s biggest error was in allowing President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to continually trample over public opinion, annihilate localist KMT members and pursue a fast-paced move toward unification with China.
Hung is just Ma’s shadow. If the party endorses her as presidential candidate, next year’s elections might be curtain time for the KMT.
If, on the other hand, People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) pairs with Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) for the pan-blue camp, Tsai could face a difficult battle, the outcome of which nobody could predict. Wang would launch his localist power base and join forces with the PFP under Soong. Voters would face a difficult choice: Soong and Tsai have mainstream support.
When the KMT disintegrates, its localist faction might find a new home in the PFP. Perhaps Soong could even change the name of his party to the KMT.
Allen Houng is a professor at National Yang-Ming University’s Institute of Philosophy of Mind and Cognition.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS