In 2001, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Deputy Legislative Speaker Hung Hsiu-chu (洪秀柱) — then a member of the party’s Central Standing Committee — was the unofficial standard-bearer for a process described as turning the KMT into another version of the deep-blue New Party. She proposed that former KMT president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) be punished for betraying the party and called for his membership to be revoked.
Who would have thought that almost 15 years later and after the KMT’s drubbing in last year’s nine-in-one elections, Hung again would be the torchbearer for the same process?
The KMT’s deep-blue faction appears to have ingested a large quantity of mind-altering substances and is under Hung’s spell. The similarity between these two phases of the same process is the eradication of “localist elements” within the KMT to forge a new, deep-blue party, bent on rapid unification with China.
After last year’s Sunflower movement and elections, the KMT’s deep-blue faction was in low spirits, but Hung’s proposal of “one China, same interpretation” and her call for a cross-strait peace deal have given the camp a glimmer of hope. Hung now seems to be unstoppable in the race to become the KMT’s presidential candidate.
However, there is a problem with the “one China, same interpretation” proposal: Unless China is explicitly defined as the People’s Republic of China, Beijing will assume the Taiwanese side is advocating de jure independence. Aiming to brush off accusations of rapid unification, Hung says her proposal would make China “accept that the Republic of China exists.” This is clearly a “two China” policy, a position that Beijing could never accept.
The Sunflower movement dealt a bitter blow to Chinese leadership. Beijing adjusted its Taiwan policy, choosing more subtle methods, rather than attempt to directly challenge mainstream Taiwanese public opinion. Beijing also no longer views the KMT as Taiwan’s sole spokesperson. Beijing is aware that Hung’s “one China, same interpretation” would push the KMT toward the rapid unification end of the political spectrum and result in catastrophic failure for the party in next year’s presidential and legislative elections.
The best method for dealing with the cross-strait issue is a policy of “creative ambiguity,” refraining from stirring the hornets’ nest of independence versus unification, so leaders on both sides of the Taiwan Strait do not feel forced to put their cards on the table. The US takes the same view.
Everyone wishes to prioritize the economy and no one wants to deal with “military liberation.” Therefore, Hung’s impetuous rapid-unification policy is simply throwing a bone to her rabid pack of deep-blue supporters.
The KMT’s days are numbered. The party’s biggest error was in allowing President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) to continually trample over public opinion, annihilate localist KMT members and pursue a fast-paced move toward unification with China.
Hung is just Ma’s shadow. If the party endorses her as presidential candidate, next year’s elections might be curtain time for the KMT.
If, on the other hand, People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (宋楚瑜) pairs with Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) for the pan-blue camp, Tsai could face a difficult battle, the outcome of which nobody could predict. Wang would launch his localist power base and join forces with the PFP under Soong. Voters would face a difficult choice: Soong and Tsai have mainstream support.
When the KMT disintegrates, its localist faction might find a new home in the PFP. Perhaps Soong could even change the name of his party to the KMT.
Allen Houng is a professor at National Yang-Ming University’s Institute of Philosophy of Mind and Cognition.
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS