The US Supreme Court’s ruling that same-sex marriage is a legal right across the nation marks a milestone in the march for equality.
However, the ever-expanding rainbow map of the US, bolstered by the verdict on Friday last week, is in stark contrast to the state of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights in the rest of the world, where as many as 80 nations are still hostile toward gay people.
Despite recent progress in the US, Latin America and even Ireland — one of the most conservative societies in Europe — the global campaign for the rights of sexual minorities has experienced a series of setbacks in other regions, including Africa and the Middle East.
Illustration: Mountain people
Less than 1 billion of the world’s population live in nations where same-sex marriage or civil unions are recognized, compared to almost 2.8 billion living in nations which criminalize gay people and impose severe punishments on homosexuality, such as imprisonment, lashings and even death sentences.
In about 10 nations, homosexuality is punishable by death, including Saudi Arabia, Iran, the United Arab Emirates, Sudan and Brunei.
International Gay and Lesbian Human Rights Commission (IGLHRC) executive director Jessica Stern welcomed the US Supreme Court’s ruling, but said that the campainers’ work is far from over.
“Today, and for weeks and months to come, Americans will celebrate today’s historic ruling — a dream come true for tens of thousands of [people],” she said. “The US has joined 19 other countries in recognition of the freedom to marry for same-sex couples nationwide, and yet our work is far from over — not in the US and not around the world.”
“Marriage equality is one slice of the pie, but homophobia and transphobia morph into different shapes in law and practice. Nearly 80 countries still criminalize same-sex intimacy, and countless prohibit so-called ‘cross-dressing,’” she added.
Charles Radcliffe, the UN’s special adviser on LGBT rights and the head of global issues at the UN human rights office in New York, said that the global picture was not entirely bleak and stressed that there have been significant improvements worldwide.
“There have been some setbacks, notably in some parts of the former Soviet Union and a few African countries, but it is important not to lose sight of the larger picture, which remains one of enormous progress affecting LGBT people in most of the world,” he said.
“Whether on marriage, new anti-discrimination laws or transgender inclusion, we continue to see big steps forward. Advances have not been confined to Western countries, some of the most striking changes have occurred in Latin America, and positive measures have also been taken by some African and Asian countries... Almost everywhere — even in hostile places — you see greater visibility of LGBT communities and LGBT activism,” he added.
Recent improvements on gay rights include a new gender identity law in Argentina, a new civil union law in Chile, constitutional amendments in Malta, decriminalization of gay relationships in Mozambique, pro-transgender assistance in India, and decriminalization of homosexuality in Pacific nations, such as Fiji and Palau, he said.
However, many nations in Africa and the Middle East are extremely hostile to gay people, who remain at risk of criminalization or homophobic violence.
Human Rights Watch (HRW) executive director Kenneth Roth said the intensifying backlash in the world is partly due to the greater visibility of the LGBT community in societies that have begun to recognize their rights.
“LGBT people are also convenient scapegoats for embattled leaders, who are trying to rally support from more conservative sectors of their society. Whether it is Uganda, Nigeria or Russia, the decision to scapegoat the LGBT community is an outcome of serious challenges to the regime, for widespread corruption or abusive authoritarianism,” he said, according to HRW’s Web site.
“The status of the LGBT community is a good litmus test for the status of human rights in society more broadly, precisely because it is such a vulnerable minority — similar to the proverbial canary in the coal mine. Where the rights of LGBT people are undermined, you can be sure that the rights of other minorities and critical members of civil society will soon also be in jeopardy,” he added.
The Commonwealth remains a bastion of homophobia, with 41 out 53 member states still using British colonial-era legislation to criminalize homosexuals.
A major setback for gay rights campaigners was a 2013 ruling by the Indian Supreme Court, which recriminalized gay sex in the nation, Kaleidoscope Trust executive director Felicity Daly said.
In Trinidad and Tobago, gay people can be jailed for up to 25 years; in Malaysia the punishment for being gay is 20 years plus an additional sentence of lashing. Sierra Leone, Tanzania, Pakistan, Uganda, Bangladesh and Guyana all impose life imprisonment for homosexuality.
Last month in Morocco, two gay men were sentenced to four months each in jail after they were arrested for standing too close to one another as they posed for a photograph.
Amid improvements, violence against gay people remains a big concern, said Joel Simkhai, the chief executive officer of gay dating app Grindr.
“Since 2008, activists have documented over 800 murders of transgender people,” he wrote in a column for the Huffington Post in May.
“Sometimes the perpetrators who act against us represent governments, themselves, as happened with police raids on a gay bar in Kenya last year. Other times, it is their lack of action to protect us that makes officials complicit, as when Russia ignored gun violence and gas attacks on gay clubs in Moscow. There are countless other acts of violence around the world that go unreported and ignored by local officials,” he added.
Stern said gay activists in the US should now turn their attention to fresh challenges.
“First, we must address those who are most vulnerable within this country, including transgender people in immigration detention. Second, I hope that we will join the global movement to fight intolerance and affirm fundamental dignity. That work must truly become our own if we hope to achieve a world free and equal for all. Today is not an end, but a new beginning,” Stern said.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS