Universities offer academic programs beyond a high-school level. A university education should not only provide education for those wanting to enter professional careers, but also develop students’ creativity, insight and analytical skills.
By acquainting students with complex ideas in an intellectually stimulating environment, universities offer opportunities for personal enrichment.
Employers increasingly seek college graduates who have gained the critical thinking and problem-solving skills necessary to adapt to changing economic conditions.
Because universities in Taiwan are often expected to perform a wide variety of roles, many institutions are experiencing difficulty in meeting all the needs of competing interests.
Businesses and government count on universities to provide occupational training professional and public life. However, many educators also expect colleges and universities to provide students with a broad-based liberal arts foundation that might have no direct vocational application.
Universities therefore must decide whether to establish educational standards that would integrate liberal arts and professional objectives or to separate academic and vocational curricula.
Admissions standards in Taiwan’s universities have also become controversial. Some institutions — such as national universities — have highly selective admissions from competitive examinations. Others admit virtually any high-school graduate able to meet minimum requirements.
Education policy must find a balance in the conflicting tension between the right of every student to access higher education and pursue a college degree and the necessity of combating compromised education quality as a result of lax admission standards.
Contentious in secondary education is the competition between localization, such as learning about Aboriginal languages or cultures, and globalization, such as learning foreign languages and world history.
This question also extends to whether a Taiwan-centric or Chinese-centric perspective should take precedence in history curricula.
Many educators have advocated a more diverse undergraduate curriculum at universities. They argue that traditional college curricula focus too much on the history and culture of the Chinese tradition, and advocate either a more multicultural or global curriculum.
On the other hand, critics emphasize the core of knowledge that lies within the cultural tradition, which informs moral, intellectual and aesthetic judgement.
Three directions for change could address these issues. First, education should be cultivated for its own sake and provide a bastion in which young people can learn without corruption from the public order. In her 1938 work entitled Three Guineas, English modernist writer Virginia Woolf expounds her value of education.
In her view, administrators “must consider very carefully before you begin to rebuild your college what is the aim of education, what kind of society, what kind of human being it should seek to produce.”
She discusses the need for institutions that teach “the arts of human intercourse” and “the art of understanding other people’s lives and minds.”
In cultivating citizens and civic virtue, Woolf’s vision of education is one in which learning is sought for itself and competition and jealousy are best avoided. Hence, individual universities and schools must decide whether liberal arts or professional objectives are to be emphasized and attract interested students based on respective strengths.
Second, the long-term overhaul of admissions requirements can enhance the overall quality of Taiwan’s universities. The relative success of colleges and universities in the US suggests that the US’ admissions model might be worthy of emulation. Instead of entrance by competitive examination only, the standardized test should be a factor deciding student admission.
In the US, nearly all colleges require students to submit transcripts of grades from high school and scores on standardized tests. They also require an application form, written essays of their accomplishments and goals, and letters of recommendation from teachers who are familiar with the applicant’s academic background. The US model provides universities greater latitude in making a holistic selection of the entering class.
Finally, Taiwan should arrive at a consensus of “one curriculum, many textbooks and adoption by respective schools,” as well as an institutionalized procedure of discussion and reform to promote diversity in secondary education.
There should be more elective flexibility for high-school students and course offerings that focus on traditional Chinese culture in addition to others that explore multicultural or global themes.
Broadly, history or civic education should adhere to the “concentric zone model” with Taiwan as the nucleus, China and Asia as the inner core and the world as the outer core.
A robust history curriculum equips students with the critical ability to respect others, understand society, tolerate differences and appreciate diversity and enables them to decide whether they are more convinced by a Taiwan-centric or Chinese-centric view.
Within this understanding, textbook publishers enjoy freedom in their portrayals of history, while educators and parents exercise discretion as to which books should be adopted.
Alfred Tsai attends Columbia University, where he is studying economics and political science.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS