Taiwan is surrounded by sea. Where the cold subarctic Oyashio current and the north-flowing Kuroshio current collide off east Japan creates fertile conditions for fishing. However, Taiwan’s leaders have long followed policies favoring cultivation of land food sources over maritime ones and have little concept of how to make use of maritime resources. At the same time, industrial and household waste has polluted coastal areas and destroyed maritime ecology. Farmers have consistently been favored over fishermen, whether it be in terms of budget, personnel allocation, or status of organizations. Fishermen have been largely ignored by the government.
Even though the new ocean era has arrived with the passing of four pieces of legislation on the regulation of maritime issues, the fisheries industry remains constrained by the conflict between domestic and international issues. This is manifest in a drastic reduction in the area of international waters, limits on international fishing quotas, an increase in the cost of entering the fishing industry, the risk of armed intimidation on the seas, a shortage of personnel and crew, rising operational costs and risk, falling fishing resources along coastal areas, and an underperforming supply and sales system, all of which threaten the industry.
However, whenever there is a presidential election on the horizon, the so-called fisheries industries groups, on the instigation of government officials, will always come to the fore, sometimes even publishing swathes of ads supporting the candidate of the ruling party. It is interesting to question whether this is more about personal interest or whether the groups are genuinely representing the voice of the majority of fishermen. And the candidate will always announce, among all this frenetic campaign fanfare, assurances about how they take the development of the fisheries industry seriously.
Of course, after the victor is anointed, all of these assurances evaporate and the most that anyone gets is positions and funds in recognition of their services.
The transition of power made no difference either. It was just more of the same, leaving the local economies of fishing communities to continue to decline and the fishermen to struggle every time they went out to sea. Fishermen’s working and living conditions are difficult; work is hard to come by and matters are made worse when fishermen are illegally detained at sea, putting more pressure on depleted stocks along the coast. Scenes of bustling markets with fishermen auctioning their catch are a thing of the past: It is unlikely to be seen again.
Fishermen despair that they no longer have a safe environment in which they can fish in peace. It makes the utopian vision offered by presidential candidates all the more risible: The vision they offer is a peculiarity that comes around but once every four years, while the everyday life of fishermen remains as difficult as ever.
The lesson from these years of struggle for fishermen and their families is that if they no longer want to worry where their next meal is coming from, they should not look elsewhere to cast the blame; if they want to improve their circumstances and change their fate, they need to approach next year’s presidential election in a different way. If they do not want to continue being a stepping stone for officials looking to further their careers, fishermen should not allow themselves to be so easily mobilized in their support. They need to band together and demand that the assurances of the candidates will ensure fishermen’s safety while at sea; secure adequate fishing areas through international agreements; improve onboard working conditions and wage structures to entice young people; strictly enforce prohibitions on foreign fishing boats illegally fishing in Taiwanese waters; take active measures to allow restoration of near-sea fishing stocks; prepare a fishing catch production and marketing system; introduce measures to improve the economy of fishing communities; offer opportunities for fishermen to change their careers and move into other industries; and look into how matters can be improved through cooperation with other countries.
It is likely that more candidates will join the race for next year’s election. Fishermen need to scrutinize everything these candidates and their core teams say and do, find out what they have done in the past for fishermen’s rights and the degree to which they have supported fisheries-related regulations, and look into their relationship with financial groups and what loyalties they have to political parties, factions, relations, money and other individuals. Then they can use their collective vote to change their own, and Taiwan’s, destiny.
Du Yu is chief executive officer of the Chen-Li Task Force for Agricultural Reform.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS