Taiwan is surrounded by sea. Where the cold subarctic Oyashio current and the north-flowing Kuroshio current collide off east Japan creates fertile conditions for fishing. However, Taiwan’s leaders have long followed policies favoring cultivation of land food sources over maritime ones and have little concept of how to make use of maritime resources. At the same time, industrial and household waste has polluted coastal areas and destroyed maritime ecology. Farmers have consistently been favored over fishermen, whether it be in terms of budget, personnel allocation, or status of organizations. Fishermen have been largely ignored by the government.
Even though the new ocean era has arrived with the passing of four pieces of legislation on the regulation of maritime issues, the fisheries industry remains constrained by the conflict between domestic and international issues. This is manifest in a drastic reduction in the area of international waters, limits on international fishing quotas, an increase in the cost of entering the fishing industry, the risk of armed intimidation on the seas, a shortage of personnel and crew, rising operational costs and risk, falling fishing resources along coastal areas, and an underperforming supply and sales system, all of which threaten the industry.
However, whenever there is a presidential election on the horizon, the so-called fisheries industries groups, on the instigation of government officials, will always come to the fore, sometimes even publishing swathes of ads supporting the candidate of the ruling party. It is interesting to question whether this is more about personal interest or whether the groups are genuinely representing the voice of the majority of fishermen. And the candidate will always announce, among all this frenetic campaign fanfare, assurances about how they take the development of the fisheries industry seriously.
Of course, after the victor is anointed, all of these assurances evaporate and the most that anyone gets is positions and funds in recognition of their services.
The transition of power made no difference either. It was just more of the same, leaving the local economies of fishing communities to continue to decline and the fishermen to struggle every time they went out to sea. Fishermen’s working and living conditions are difficult; work is hard to come by and matters are made worse when fishermen are illegally detained at sea, putting more pressure on depleted stocks along the coast. Scenes of bustling markets with fishermen auctioning their catch are a thing of the past: It is unlikely to be seen again.
Fishermen despair that they no longer have a safe environment in which they can fish in peace. It makes the utopian vision offered by presidential candidates all the more risible: The vision they offer is a peculiarity that comes around but once every four years, while the everyday life of fishermen remains as difficult as ever.
The lesson from these years of struggle for fishermen and their families is that if they no longer want to worry where their next meal is coming from, they should not look elsewhere to cast the blame; if they want to improve their circumstances and change their fate, they need to approach next year’s presidential election in a different way. If they do not want to continue being a stepping stone for officials looking to further their careers, fishermen should not allow themselves to be so easily mobilized in their support. They need to band together and demand that the assurances of the candidates will ensure fishermen’s safety while at sea; secure adequate fishing areas through international agreements; improve onboard working conditions and wage structures to entice young people; strictly enforce prohibitions on foreign fishing boats illegally fishing in Taiwanese waters; take active measures to allow restoration of near-sea fishing stocks; prepare a fishing catch production and marketing system; introduce measures to improve the economy of fishing communities; offer opportunities for fishermen to change their careers and move into other industries; and look into how matters can be improved through cooperation with other countries.
It is likely that more candidates will join the race for next year’s election. Fishermen need to scrutinize everything these candidates and their core teams say and do, find out what they have done in the past for fishermen’s rights and the degree to which they have supported fisheries-related regulations, and look into their relationship with financial groups and what loyalties they have to political parties, factions, relations, money and other individuals. Then they can use their collective vote to change their own, and Taiwan’s, destiny.
Du Yu is chief executive officer of the Chen-Li Task Force for Agricultural Reform.
Translated by Paul Cooper
In an article published in Newsweek on Monday last week, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged China to retake territories it lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. “If it is really for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t China take back Russia?” Lai asked, referring to territories lost in 1858 and 1860. The territories once made up the two flanks of northern Manchuria. Once ceded to Russia, they became part of the Russian far east. Claims since then have been made that China and Russia settled the disputes in the 1990s through the 2000s and that “China
Trips to the Kenting Peninsula in Pingtung County have dredged up a lot of public debate and furor, with many complaints about how expensive and unreasonable lodging is. Some people even call it a tourist “butchering ground.” Many local business owners stake claims to beach areas by setting up parasols and driving away people who do not rent them. The managing authority for the area — Kenting National Park — has long ignored the issue. Ultimately, this has affected the willingness of domestic travelers to go there, causing tourist numbers to plummet. In 2008, Taiwan opened the door to Chinese tourists and in
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
The arrest in France of Telegram founder and CEO Pavel Durov has brought into sharp focus one of the major conflicts of our age. On one hand, we want privacy in our digital lives, which is why we like the kind of end-to-end encryption Telegram promises. On the other, we want the government to be able to stamp out repugnant online activities — such as child pornography or terrorist plotting. The reality is that we cannot have our cake and eat it, too. Durov last month was charged with complicity in crimes taking place on the app, including distributing child pornography,
RSS