Taiwan is surrounded by sea. Where the cold subarctic Oyashio current and the north-flowing Kuroshio current collide off east Japan creates fertile conditions for fishing. However, Taiwan’s leaders have long followed policies favoring cultivation of land food sources over maritime ones and have little concept of how to make use of maritime resources. At the same time, industrial and household waste has polluted coastal areas and destroyed maritime ecology. Farmers have consistently been favored over fishermen, whether it be in terms of budget, personnel allocation, or status of organizations. Fishermen have been largely ignored by the government.
Even though the new ocean era has arrived with the passing of four pieces of legislation on the regulation of maritime issues, the fisheries industry remains constrained by the conflict between domestic and international issues. This is manifest in a drastic reduction in the area of international waters, limits on international fishing quotas, an increase in the cost of entering the fishing industry, the risk of armed intimidation on the seas, a shortage of personnel and crew, rising operational costs and risk, falling fishing resources along coastal areas, and an underperforming supply and sales system, all of which threaten the industry.
However, whenever there is a presidential election on the horizon, the so-called fisheries industries groups, on the instigation of government officials, will always come to the fore, sometimes even publishing swathes of ads supporting the candidate of the ruling party. It is interesting to question whether this is more about personal interest or whether the groups are genuinely representing the voice of the majority of fishermen. And the candidate will always announce, among all this frenetic campaign fanfare, assurances about how they take the development of the fisheries industry seriously.
Of course, after the victor is anointed, all of these assurances evaporate and the most that anyone gets is positions and funds in recognition of their services.
The transition of power made no difference either. It was just more of the same, leaving the local economies of fishing communities to continue to decline and the fishermen to struggle every time they went out to sea. Fishermen’s working and living conditions are difficult; work is hard to come by and matters are made worse when fishermen are illegally detained at sea, putting more pressure on depleted stocks along the coast. Scenes of bustling markets with fishermen auctioning their catch are a thing of the past: It is unlikely to be seen again.
Fishermen despair that they no longer have a safe environment in which they can fish in peace. It makes the utopian vision offered by presidential candidates all the more risible: The vision they offer is a peculiarity that comes around but once every four years, while the everyday life of fishermen remains as difficult as ever.
The lesson from these years of struggle for fishermen and their families is that if they no longer want to worry where their next meal is coming from, they should not look elsewhere to cast the blame; if they want to improve their circumstances and change their fate, they need to approach next year’s presidential election in a different way. If they do not want to continue being a stepping stone for officials looking to further their careers, fishermen should not allow themselves to be so easily mobilized in their support. They need to band together and demand that the assurances of the candidates will ensure fishermen’s safety while at sea; secure adequate fishing areas through international agreements; improve onboard working conditions and wage structures to entice young people; strictly enforce prohibitions on foreign fishing boats illegally fishing in Taiwanese waters; take active measures to allow restoration of near-sea fishing stocks; prepare a fishing catch production and marketing system; introduce measures to improve the economy of fishing communities; offer opportunities for fishermen to change their careers and move into other industries; and look into how matters can be improved through cooperation with other countries.
It is likely that more candidates will join the race for next year’s election. Fishermen need to scrutinize everything these candidates and their core teams say and do, find out what they have done in the past for fishermen’s rights and the degree to which they have supported fisheries-related regulations, and look into their relationship with financial groups and what loyalties they have to political parties, factions, relations, money and other individuals. Then they can use their collective vote to change their own, and Taiwan’s, destiny.
Du Yu is chief executive officer of the Chen-Li Task Force for Agricultural Reform.
Translated by Paul Cooper
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS