When Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (王金平) raised Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential hopeful Hung Hsiu-chu’s (洪秀柱) hand and gave her his full support, saying three times — without stopping to examine his own behavior — that it was his “unshirkable duty” to do so, he set his place in history — as a useless politician.
When Hung used a cane to discipline students, got involved in physical fights in the legislative chamber and was caught on video shouting at people in public, she also bought herself a place in history — as a politician who prefers to use violence to ger her point across.
When a useless politician meets a violent one, it is analgous to a timid junior-high school student meeting a violent school dean: The student bows his head to authority, admits his faults and obediently writes vows promising to work harder on the blackboard.
Some people might say that it is not wise to underestimate Wang, who has a reputation as a wily and versatile politician.
This brings to mind Mao Zedong (毛澤東), who once swallowed insult and shouted: “Long live Generalissimo Chiang Kai-shek” (蔣介石) — but in the end, it was Chiang who had to retreat and take “temporary refuge” in Taiwan.
However, such an analogy might be giving too much credit to Wang.
Wang describes himself as a member of the pan-blue camp, but a true Taiwanese at heart. If that were true, then that would be an insult to Taiwanese.
Taiwanese might not be as quick to take action as the violent Hung, but neither are they cowardly like former minister of health Yaung Chih-liang (楊志良), who, having failed to obtain the KMT’s endorsement, did not even dare pick up an application form to enter the party’s presidential primary.
There is no place for a Taiwanese mentality in the KMT, because it has yet to win the trust of older pro-unification members.
In the same way, the KMT’s mentality and secretive politics have yet to win the trust of Taiwan-centric, grassroots-oriented politicians.
The recent so-called “primary election mechanism” might be a more transparent form of selection that could force the KMT to reform, but Wang either chose — or was forced to — give up a shot at the nomination.
If Wang was forced to give up his presidential bid to protect the vested interests of his friends, because President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) had managed to get hold of some information that he could use against the legislative speaker, he should just have kept his mouth shut and suffered in silence.
After all, he has been a foot soldier all his life, so why suddenly put on a show now?
However, if it was only Ma and his deep-blue allies that were sidelining Wang, then he should have stood up and fought, put his trust in the opinion polls and let the public decide.
That he did not dare take this approach and that he was dissatisfied with the situation only serves to highlight his incompetence.
The disgraced Wang is hanging on to his last strand of dignity as he refuses to fall into line under Ma’s whip.
However, after saying that he was duty-bound and would accept the party’s nomination if he were drafted by the party, only to see Ma’s own favorite, Hung, being anointed, while he was drafted to come out and call for unity behind Hung — even repeating three times that it is his unshirkable duty to do so, one wonders if the party’s pro-Taiwanese faction would ever dare look voters in the eye again.
James Wang is a media commentator.
Translated by Zane Kheir
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
RSS