The seventh US-China Strategic and Economic Dialogue conference wrapped up in Washington on Wednesday with the announcement of more than 100 outcomes of discussions on everything from trade and economic issues, security and military cooperation to climate change, energy and maritime issues. However, despite the diplomatic niceties, the overall impression is of two sides talking past, not with, each other.
The dialogue conferences are intended to set the guidelines for relations between the two nations, and this week’s meetings were seen as especially crucial because of Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) first state visit to the US set for September.
Despite the positive spin given at the closing news conference by the US’ Secretary of State John Kerry and Secretary of the Treasury Jack Lew and China’s State Councilor Yang Jiechi (楊潔篪) and Vice Premier Wang Yang (汪洋) on discussions about currency issues and other concerns, cracks in the facade were evident.
Kerry said this year’s conference was “one of the more constructive and productive in terms of the seriousness of the discussion,” yet he also talked about “acceptable international norms of behavior.” Yang spoke about the need for the US to “accommodate China’s concerns” and handle differences “with caution.”
Blunt talk was left to US President Barack Obama during a closed-door meeting at the White House on Wednesday with top Chinese delegates. He said that Beijing needed to ease tensions caused by its hacking of US systems and expansive maritime claims.
Beijing’s aggressive promotion of its South China Sea claims have been the focus of a lot of speeches in recent months, but at Wednesday’s closing news conference, all Kerry said was: “Countries with competing claims should exercise restraint, refrain from preventative unilateral actions, and settle their differences in accordance with international law.”
Instead, both sides focused on a new “oceans working group,” discussing maritime environmental protection, security and law enforcement, with an emphasis on conservation and protection.
Kerry said that the US and China would work together to try to create a marine protected area in the Ross Sea, while Yang talked about the oceans being “a shared homeland of mankind.”
Such talk is nice, but both sides need to take a more realistic look at their positions and forge a relationship that reflects the positive contributions that they can make, rather than focusing on each other’s perceived weaknesses.
Washington can acknowledge that China does have a greater role to play in the world through initiatives such as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank, while Beijing can acknowledge, and act to mitigate, that its maritime expansions cause serious concerns to neighboring countries.
China cannot lay claim to a greater role on the world stage while ignoring the responsibilities that come with it, while the US cannot pretend that it is the only major player in the room anymore.
However, this week’s talks have shown that both sides are far from being able talk to one another — and listen.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
If you had a vision of the future where China did not dominate the global car industry, you can kiss those dreams goodbye. That is because US President Donald Trump’s promised 25 percent tariff on auto imports takes an ax to the only bits of the emerging electric vehicle (EV) supply chain that are not already dominated by Beijing. The biggest losers when the levies take effect this week would be Japan and South Korea. They account for one-third of the cars imported into the US, and as much as two-thirds of those imported from outside North America. (Mexico and Canada, while
I have heard people equate the government’s stance on resisting forced unification with China or the conditional reinstatement of the military court system with the rise of the Nazis before World War II. The comparison is absurd. There is no meaningful parallel between the government and Nazi Germany, nor does such a mindset exist within the general public in Taiwan. It is important to remember that the German public bore some responsibility for the horrors of the Holocaust. Post-World War II Germany’s transitional justice efforts were rooted in a national reckoning and introspection. Many Jews were sent to concentration camps not
RSS