The central bank yesterday again dashed hopes of local exporters that it would weaken the New Taiwan dollar to save bleak exports.
Taiwanese manufacturers’ call for the central bank to curb the rise of local currency has grown louder recently as they are facing competition from South Korean, Japanese and Chinese rivals. If the central bank can wield greater influence on the foreign exchange market to weaken local currency, Taiwanese exporters can sell their goods at lower prices, manufacturers said.
Exporters say they have been undercut by rivals due to unfavorable foreign exchange rates, especially with a slowing global economy curtailing demand for electronics, including PCs and smartphones.
The NT dollar has appreciated 2.14 percent against the US dollar since the beginning of this year, while the Korean won, Japanese yen and Chinese yuan have depreciated 0.82 percent, 3.49 percent and 0.05 percent respectively.
Central bank Governor Perng Fai-nan (彭淮南) yesterday said a weakening NT dollar would not be an antidote to Taiwan’s sluggish exports. Instead, local companies have to count on themselves by enhancing their manufacturing capabilities to win orders, he said.
However, Perng’s suggestion is a long-term solution. Weakening the local currency is considered by some as an effective approach, or at least a quick fix, to increasing exports and thereby boosting the economy.
The nation’s GDP is losing steam as the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics trimmed its annual economic growth forecast to 3.28 percent for this year, from its previous estimate of 3.78 percent, in light of sluggish exports, and sagging domestic consumption and private investment.
According to the Ministry of Economic Affairs statistics, exports last month unexpectedly fell to the lowest rate in about two years, down 5.9 percent annually to US$35.79 billion, excluding seasonal factors, with the ministry citing sluggish demand from China and Hong Kong for the decline.
The ministry expects the trend to continue this month, saying that an annual decline in exports for the third consecutive month is highly likely.
The trend could continue in the long term as leading indicators fell for a 12th consecutive month to a two-and-half-year low of 97.74 in April, while the economic monitoring indicator flashed “blue,” meaning a sluggish economy, for the first time in more than two years, according to the National Development Council.
As economists forecast, the central bank yesterday kept key interest rates unchanged for the 16th consecutive quarter in an effort to sustain GDP growth.
“We do not need to cut interest rates to prop up the economy yet,” Perng said.
Taiwan is steering a different course from its Asian neighbors. South Korea’s central bank on June 11 trimmed its policy rates by 25 basis points to a record-low to offset adverse impact from an outbreak of Middle East respiratory syndrome (MERS), the second rate cut this year. The People’s Bank of China has continued to inject capital into its financial system in attempts to support GDP growth.
The central bank has a good reputation for making suitable monetary policies and helped weather the financial crisis in 2008.
The question is whether Taiwan’s export-dependant economy can withstand a global economic slowdown, with China’s growth slowing and a stumbling European economic recovery overshadowed by a potential Greek debt default.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS