In his first inaugural address, during the depths of the Great Depression, then-US president Franklin Roosevelt famously told Americans: “The only thing we have to fear is fear itself.”
Invoking Exodus, he went on to say: “We are stricken by no plague of locusts.”
Nothing tangible was causing the depression; the problem in March 1933 was in people’s minds.
The same could be said today, seven years after the 2008 global financial crisis, about the world economy’s many remaining weak spots. Fear causes individuals to restrain their spending and firms to withhold investments; as a result, the economy weakens, confirming their fear and leading them to restrain spending further. The downturn deepens, and a vicious circle of despair takes hold. Though the 2008 financial crisis has passed, we remain stuck in the emotional cycle that it set in motion.
It is a bit like stage fright. Dwelling on performance anxiety might cause hesitation or a loss of inspiration. As fear turns into fact, the anxiety worsens — and so does the performance. Once such a cycle starts, it can be difficult to stop.
According to Google Ngrams, it was during the Great Depression — in about the late 1930s — that the term “feedback loop” began to appear frequently in books, often in relation to electronics. If a microphone is placed in front of a loudspeaker, eventually some disturbance will cause the system to produce a painful wail as sound loops from the loudspeaker to the microphone and back. Then, in 1948, sociologist Robert Merton popularized the phrase “self-fulfilling prophecy” in an essay with that title. Merton’s prime example was the Great Depression.
However, the memory of the Great Depression is fading today and many people probably do not imagine that such a thing could be happening now. Surely, they think, economic weakness must be due to something more tangible than a feedback loop. However, it is not and the most direct evidence of this is, despite rock-bottom interest rates, investment is not booming.
In fact, real (inflation-adjusted) interest rates are hovering at about zero throughout much of the world and have been for more than five years. This is especially true for government borrowing, but corporate interest rates, too, are at record lows.
In such circumstances, governments considering a proposal to build, say, a new highway, should regard this as an ideal time. If the highway will cost US$1 billion, last indefinitely with regular maintenance and repairs, and yield projected annual net benefits to society of US$20 million, a long-term real interest rate of 3 percent would make it nonviable; the interest cost would exceed the benefit. However, if the long-term real interest rate is 1 percent, the government should borrow the money and build it. That is just sound investing.
In fact, the 30-year inflation-indexed US government bond yield as of May 4 was only 0.86 percent, compared with more than 4 percent in 2000. Such rates are similarly low today in many countries.
The need for better highways cannot have declined; on the contrary, given population growth, the need for investment can only have become more pronounced. So why is there not a highway-construction boom?
People’s weak appetite for economic risk might not be the result of pure fear, at least not in the sense of an anxiety like stage fright. It might stem from a perception that others are afraid, or that something is inexplicably wrong with the business environment, or a lack of inspiration, which can help overcome background fears.
It is worth noting that the US experienced its fastest economic growth since 1929 in the 1950s and 1960s, a time of high government expenditure on the US Interstate Highway System, which was launched in 1956. As the system was completed, one could cross the country and reach its commercial hubs on high-speed expressways at 120kph.
Maybe the national highway system was more inspirational than the kinds of things that Roosevelt tried in a bid to stimulate the US out of the Great Depression. With his Civilian Conservation Corps, for example, young men were enlisted to clean up the wilderness and plant trees. That sounded like a pleasant experience — maybe a learning experience — for young men who would otherwise be idle and unemployed. However, it was not a great inspiration for the future, which might help to explain why Roosevelt’s New Deal was unable to end the US’ economic malaise.
By contrast, the apparent relative strength of the US economy today might reflect some highly visible recent inspirations. The fracking revolution, widely viewed as originating in the US, has helped to lower energy prices and has eliminated America’s dependence on foreign oil. Likewise, much of the rapid advance in communications in recent years reflects innovations — smartphone and tablet hardware and software, for example — that has been indigenous to the US.
Higher government spending could stimulate the economy further, assuming that it generates a level of inspiration like that of the Interstate Highway System. It is not true that governments are inherently unable to stimulate people’s imagination. What is called for is not little patches here and there, but something big and revolutionary.
Government-funded space-exploration programs around the world have been profound inspirations. Of course, it was scientists, not government bureaucrats, who led the charge. However, such programs, whether publicly funded or not, have been psychologically transforming. People see in them a vision for a greater future. And with inspiration comes a decline in fear, which now, as in Roosevelt’s time, is the main obstacle to economic progress.
Robert Shiller, a 2013 Nobel laureate in economics, is a professor of economics at Yale University.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
US President Donald Trump last week told reporters that he had signed about 12 letters to US trading partners, which were set to be sent out yesterday, levying unilateral tariff rates of up to 70 percent from Aug. 1. However, Trump did not say which countries the letters would be sent to, nor did he discuss the specific tariff rates, reports said. The news of the tariff letters came as Washington and Hanoi reached a trade deal earlier last week to cut tariffs on Vietnamese exports to the US to 20 percent from 46 percent, making it the first Asian country
Life as we know it will probably not come to an end in Japan this weekend, but what if it does? That is the question consuming a disaster-prone country ahead of a widely spread prediction of disaster that one comic book suggests would occur tomorrow. The Future I Saw, a manga by Ryo Tatsuki about her purported ability to see the future in dreams, was first published in 1999. It would have faded into obscurity, but for the mention of a tsunami and the cover that read “Major disaster in March 2011.” Years later, when the most powerful earthquake ever
As things heated up in the Middle East in early June, some in the Pentagon resisted American involvement in the Israel-Iran war because it would divert American attention and resources from the real challenge: China. This was exactly wrong. Rather, bombing Iran was the best thing that could have happened for America’s Asia policy. When it came to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program, “all options are on the table” had become an American mantra over the past two decades. But the more often US administration officials insisted that military force was in the cards, the less anyone believed it. After
During an impromptu Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) rally on Tuesday last week to protest what the party called the unfairness of the judicial system, a young TPP supporter said that if Taiwan goes to war, he would “surrender to the [Chinese] People’s Liberation Army [PLA] with unyielding determination.” The rally was held after former Taipei deputy mayor Pong Cheng-sheng’s (彭振聲) wife took her life prior to Pong’s appearance in court to testify in the Core Pacific corruption case involving former Taipei mayor and TPP chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). The TPP supporter said President William Lai (賴清德) was leading them to die on
RSS