In truth, we tend to be self-centered creatures with carefully hidden neuroses and blatantly displayed egos. The archives of world literature are full of anecdotes about novelists and poets who were, willingly or unwillingly, horrible to the people who have had the misfortune of loving them.
Yet, strangely, nice souls though we might not necessarily be, we change while we are in the midst of writing a book. We change, and I dare say we become better people. A novelist is always wiser when inside a novel than when outside. Stories shape their storytellers as much as storytellers shape their stories. We are a different person when we start a book and by the time it is completed, something deep inside has shifted forever. Stories have an inner power of their own and as anyone who has written a piece of fiction will testify, writers are less the masters than the galley slaves of that mysterious power.
Today, interestingly, that power has been discovered by a plethora of people who have little to do with literature. Print and digital journalism, TV and radio broadcasting, advertising, academia, public relations, popular science, neuroscience — even finance and marketing — all are interested in how to tell a story to a greater number of people.
Novelists and short-story writers have been rather slow to respond to this development. While we keep toiling in our little islands, assuming that the art of storytelling is our birthright, elsewhere stories are being put to use by non-writers. This newly and widely story-centric world could have been pleasantly exciting had there not been an unseen danger underneath. Among today’s debut storytellers are some unexpected figures: the extremists.
Today extremists have discovered the power of storytelling and they are exploiting it lavishly to spread a culture of intolerance. Throughout the 1970s, social movements had their thinkers; today they have their storytellers. From Islamic fundamentalism in the Middle East to far-right movements across Europe, from Russian ultra-nationalism to religious authoritarianism in Turkey, sectarian ideologies are offering young people a set of stories to believe in. Via social media and print, real or imaginary stories are being shared by xenophobes of all kinds.
COGNITIVE GAP
In Hungary, Sweden, Austria, France and Germany, and more recently the UK, ultranationalists are reproducing stories about immigrants who are destroying the fabric of their society. Meanwhile, in the Middle East, anti-Western sentiments are fed by the myth that Westerners have no family values and kick their children out of the house when they reach puberty.
Stories have become instruments for stereotypes and dogmas. In a world that confuses “sameness” with “safety,” and “simplicity” with “clarity,” partisans from every side are making the most of stories.
Far-right movements across Europe claim that we would be safer and happier and wealthier if we were all of the same kind. Islamic fundamentalism is brainwashing young people into thinking that they have nothing in common not only with non-Muslims, but also with those Muslims who do not agree with them.
Whether they are drawn with swords and prayers or with swastikas and oaths, the boundaries between “us” and “them” are deepening. However, these are imagined boundaries and who better than a writer, a creature of imagination, to question the mental ghettos that extremist ideologies are trying to trap us in?
Politics and literature do not speak the same language. While politics thrives upon generalizations, literature cherishes nuances. The former is made of solid dualities, the latter of flowing waters. While politics dwells upon how we differ from others, literature shows how similar we are even to those who seem to be the farthest. That said, non-Western authors have had a different relationship with politics from their Western colleagues.
Writers from lands where democracy is still an unfulfilled dream, such as Turkey, Pakistan, Nigeria or Egypt, do not have the luxury of being apolitical. As non-Western authors, at every reading we give, every festival we attend, we are more likely to be asked political questions than literary or artistic ones.
However, it is not only the non-Western author who has to pay attention to politics today. Not anymore. When storytelling has been hijacked by partisans from all sides, whether authors will claim back their art and craft is a question that concerns us all.
These days politics is knocking on the door of Western authors. Will they open the door and engage, or wait for the unexpected guest to go away? And what if the guest is here to stay?
Even the briefest trip to any location in the Middle East is enough to understand that an alarming cognitive gap has opened up between different regions of the world. The number of people who do not believe that human rights, women’s rights and freedom of expression are universal values is sadly escalating. No country or group is immune from the ongoing insanity. Globalization has not only connected us financially and technologically, but has also intertwined our stories and, therefore, our destinies.
SECTARIAN POLITICS
Writers have a duty to build bridges of empathy. This does not mean that our novels ought to be political. We must keep writing the kind of stories we want to write.
Yet at the same time, through campaigns and social projects, networks and community works, we must speak up for democracy, pluralism, cosmopolitanism and coexistence. Writers are solitary creatures. However, this is a new century with unprecedented dilemmas. We need to leave our comfort zones and engage with the world from which we draw our stories. We must each find ways to do this without jeopardizing our artistic freedom and individuality.
The Folio Prize, as the first major English-language prize that has its doors open to writers from all over the world, regardless of genre, and the Folio Academy, with its diverse community, can become an important hub to connect creative-minded individuals across cultures and borders. If sectarian politics has seized the art of storytelling, writers can inspire a counternarrative to emphasize our common humanity.
Doris Lessing once rightly said that literature was analysis after the event. Yet today, both non-Western and Western authors are faced with a challenge. Can we write, interpret and analyze, not after, but during the event?
Born in Strasbourg in 1971, Elif Shafak is Turkey’s best-selling female novelist. She is the author of 12 books, and writes in both English and Turkish.
Concerns that the US might abandon Taiwan are often overstated. While US President Donald Trump’s handling of Ukraine raised unease in Taiwan, it is crucial to recognize that Taiwan is not Ukraine. Under Trump, the US views Ukraine largely as a European problem, whereas the Indo-Pacific region remains its primary geopolitical focus. Taipei holds immense strategic value for Washington and is unlikely to be treated as a bargaining chip in US-China relations. Trump’s vision of “making America great again” would be directly undermined by any move to abandon Taiwan. Despite the rhetoric of “America First,” the Trump administration understands the necessity of
In an article published on this page on Tuesday, Kaohsiung-based journalist Julien Oeuillet wrote that “legions of people worldwide would care if a disaster occurred in South Korea or Japan, but the same people would not bat an eyelid if Taiwan disappeared.” That is quite a statement. We are constantly reading about the importance of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC), hailed in Taiwan as the nation’s “silicon shield” protecting it from hostile foreign forces such as the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and so crucial to the global supply chain for semiconductors that its loss would cost the global economy US$1
US President Donald Trump’s challenge to domestic American economic-political priorities, and abroad to the global balance of power, are not a threat to the security of Taiwan. Trump’s success can go far to contain the real threat — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) surge to hegemony — while offering expanded defensive opportunities for Taiwan. In a stunning affirmation of the CCP policy of “forceful reunification,” an obscene euphemism for the invasion of Taiwan and the destruction of its democracy, on March 13, 2024, the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) used Chinese social media platforms to show the first-time linkage of three new
Sasha B. Chhabra’s column (“Michelle Yeoh should no longer be welcome,” March 26, page 8) lamented an Instagram post by renowned actress Michelle Yeoh (楊紫瓊) about her recent visit to “Taipei, China.” It is Chhabra’s opinion that, in response to parroting Beijing’s propaganda about the status of Taiwan, Yeoh should be banned from entering this nation and her films cut off from funding by government-backed agencies, as well as disqualified from competing in the Golden Horse Awards. She and other celebrities, he wrote, must be made to understand “that there are consequences for their actions if they become political pawns of
RSS